Literature DB >> 20033583

Improving treatment decisions from radiographs: effect of a decision aid.

Philip Anthony Mileman1, Wilbert B van den Hout.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test whether dental students' accuracy of treatment decision making for dentine caries using radiographs improved after using a decision aid (DA).
METHODS: Dental students (n = 227) assessed the need for treatment for proximal surfaces of a test set of radiographs for a scenario patient. These 20 simulated bitewings contained 56 proximal test surfaces of which 14 were sound, 19 had enamel lesions and 23 had dentine lesions according to the histological "Gold standard". The students next used a DA, followed by re-evaluation using the same test radiographs. In this test-retest design, paired two-sided T tests were used to test for improvement in sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and log diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of treatment decisions for dentine caries.
RESULTS: The students' initial mean Se, Sp and DOR were 0.66, 0.82, and 12.9 (SD 0.11, 0.10 and 8.2). After using the decision aid, mean values improved (0.67, 0.83 and 14.1) (P = 0.83, 0.07 and 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Using the stand alone DA led to a slight improvement in student performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033583     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-009-0310-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  21 in total

1.  Comparing the accuracy of Dutch dentists and dental students in the radiographic diagnosis of dentinal caries.

Authors:  P A Mileman; W B van den Hout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Randomized controlled trial of a computer-assisted learning program to improve caries detection from bitewing radiographs.

Authors:  P A Mileman; W B van den Hout; G C H Sanderink
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Looking for caries...? Teachers evaluate a program to improve caries diagnosis from radiographs.

Authors:  P A Mileman; W B van den Hout; G C H Sanderink
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.355

4.  Preferences for oral health states: effect on prescribing periapical radiographs.

Authors:  P A Mileman; W B van den Hout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Accuracy and consistency of radiographic interpretation among clinical instructors in conjunction with a training program.

Authors:  Sharon K Lanning; Al M Best; Henry J Temple; Philip S Richards; Allison Carey; Laurie K McCauley
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 6.  Evidence-based diagnosis and clinical decision making.

Authors:  P A Mileman; W B van den Hout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 7.  Caveats in the interpretation of the surgical literature.

Authors:  U Guller
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology.

Authors:  A R van Erkel; P M Pattynama
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  The application of decision making analysis to the diagnosis of approximal caries.

Authors:  P A Mileman; T Vissers; D J Purdell-Lewis
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.349

10.  Decisions on restorative treatment and recall intervals based on bitewing radiographs. A comparison between national surveys of Dutch and Norwegian practitioners.

Authors:  P A Mileman; I Espelid
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.