Literature DB >> 20033312

Selective impairments to memory consolidation in chicks produced by 5'-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine.

N V Komissarova1, A A Tiunova, K V Anokhin.   

Abstract

The aim of the present work was to study the role of DNA synthesis in the formation of different types of memory in neonatal chicks. The nucleotide analogs 5'-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IdU) and 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) were used; these are incorporated into DNA, impairing its function, and have amnestic actions in defined models of learning in mice. We studied the effects of 5'-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine of the formation of long-term memory in chicks during training in different models: passive avoidance, imprinting, taste aversion, and spatial learning in a maze. In the taste aversion model, i.p. administration of IdU (10 mg/kg 5 min before or 50 min after training) had an amnestic effect on testing 1-2 days after training. IdU-induced amnesia developed more than 6 h after training, while administration of IdU 2 h after training had no amnestic effect. 5'-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine also had a similar amnestic action in the taste aversion model. In the passive avoidance, imprinting, and spatial maze learning models, administration of IdU at the same dose before and after training did not induce amnesia. These data lead to the suggestion that DNA synthesis in the brain may play a critical role in the mechanisms of memory consolidation in chicks in types of learning such as taste aversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20033312     DOI: 10.1007/s11055-009-9237-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0097-0549


  28 in total

Review 1.  The genomic action potential.

Authors:  D F Clayton
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Why are some neurons replaced in adult brain?

Authors:  Fernando Nottebohm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Covalent modification of DNA regulates memory formation.

Authors:  Courtney A Miller; J David Sweatt
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Inhibition of neurogenesis interferes with hippocampus-dependent memory function.

Authors:  Gordon Winocur; J Martin Wojtowicz; Melanie Sekeres; Jason S Snyder; Sabrina Wang
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Passive avoidance training enhances cell proliferation in 1-day-old chicks.

Authors:  C R Dermon; B Zikopoulos; L Panagis; E Harrison; C L Lancashire; R Mileusnic; M G Stewart
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Insights into immediate-early gene function in hippocampal memory consolidation using antisense oligonucleotide and fluorescent imaging approaches.

Authors:  John F Guzowski
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  A general theory of aversion learning.

Authors:  J Garcia; P S Lasiter; F Bermudez-Rattoni; D A Deems
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Autoradiographic study of 3-H-thymidine incorporation into brain DNA during learning.

Authors:  S Reinis
Journal:  Physiol Chem Phys       Date:  1972

9.  Brain DNA changes during learning studied by administration of 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine.

Authors:  S Reinis; J Abbott; J J Clarke
Journal:  Physiol Chem Phys       Date:  1972

10.  Learning of visual food aversions by chickens (Gallus gallus) over long delays.

Authors:  G M Martin; W P Bellingham
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1979-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Brain Metabolic DNA: A Long Story and Some Conclusions.

Authors:  Antonio Giuditta; Gigliola Grassi Zucconi; Adolfo Sadile
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 5.682

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.