Molecular iodine--an expedient reagent for oxidative aromatization reactions of alpha,beta-unsaturated cyclic compounds.

Prompted by the scant attention paid by published literature reviews to the applications of molecular iodine in oxidative aromatization reactions, we decided to review methods developed to-date involving iodine as an oxidant to promote aromatization of alpha,beta-unsaturated cyclic compounds.

1. Introduction

Aromatization of substituted cyclohexenones to the corresponding phenol or phenyl ether derivatives has attracted a great deal of attention for a long time. Catalytic dehydrogenation of substituted 2-cyclohexen-1-one derivatives using 5% palladium-carbon in high boiling hydrocarbon solvents, for example, previously afforded the corresponding phenolic systems in high yields [1]. Under similar reaction conditions, substituted 2-cyclohexenone derivatives were found to undergo disproportionation leading to reduced yields of the target phenolic or phenyl ether derivatives [2]. In another development, copper(II) bromide/lithium bromide mixture in boiling acetonitrile was applied to 2-cyclohexen-1-ones and their fused derivatives to afford 75–85% of the corresponding phenolic compounds [3]. This reaction, which is believed to proceed by halogenation of the homoannular enol form of the conjugated carbonyl group, was found to occur with conservation of ring junction stereochemistry and without halogenation α to the nonconjugated carbonyl group. Dehydrogenation of 4-oxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acid and its methyl ester derivative with copper(II) bromide (CuBr2) in refluxing methanol also afforded the corresponding 4-hydroxy-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-2-carboxylic acid derivatives [4]. Despite the observed trans-esterification or esterification, the application of CuBr2 was found to be more effective than the use of sulfur at 250 ºC or 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) in benzene under reflux [4]. Homogenous transition metal complex such as rhodium trichloride trihydrate (RhCl3·3H2O) was also found to induce oxidative aromatization and remote double bond migration of alkenylcyclohexenones and unsaturated imines to afford substituted phenols and aniline derivatives [5]. Treatment of ω-alkenyl substituted cyclohexenone-1,3-diones with RhCl3·3H2O in methanol or ethanol afforded substituted resorcinols [6]. Under similar reaction conditions, related enol ethers afforded dienones. Vanadium-catalyzed oxidative aromatization of α,β-unsaturated cyclohexenones using VO(OR)Cl2 in refluxing alcohols also afforded aryl ether derivatives [7]. An efficient catalytic oxidative aromatization of 2-cyclohexenones involving a combination of a commercially available ligand-free vanadium catalyst (VOSO4), a bromide source (Bu4NBr or HBr), and an acid (trifluoroacetic acid) under atmospheric oxygen or air recently afforded the corresponding phenol derivatives [8] Although heterogenous or homogenous metal–catalyzed aromatization of substituted cyclohexenones to the corresponding phenols or phenol ethers is a well established procedure, it involves severe reaction conditions accompanied by prolonged reaction times.

The oxidative potential of iodine has been exploited over the years in the synthesis of novel aromatic and heteroaromatic compounds that may possess some biological activity or serve as building blocks for the synthesis of derivatives with potential biological applications. The naturally occurring olivetol (1a) and the antifungal antibiotic DB2073 (1b), for example, were synthesized before from substituted resorcinols, prepared in turn from the corresponding 1,3-cyclohexanediones using iodine in refluxing methanol [9]. 4-Methoxy-2-phenylquinoline (2a) and its 4-methoxy-2-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)quinoline analogue 2b, which are plant-based [10] are readily accessible in the laboratory via iodine-mediated oxidative aromatization of the corresponding 2-aryl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolin-4-ones [11]. These alkoxyquinoline derivatives, which are reported to exhibit inhibitory activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv [12] can also be accessible from 2-aryl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolin-4-ones using thallium(III) nitrate [13] or [hydroxyl(tosyloxy)iodo]benzene [14] in trimethyl orthoformate in the presence of catalytic amount of perchloric acid or using FeCl3.6H2O in methanol [15]. The use of potentially explosive perchloric acid and/ or environmentally unfriendly metallic reagents that are not easy to obtain represent some of the drawbacks of these methods.

Structures of olivetol 1a and DB2073 1b.

Structures of naturally occurring 2-aryl-4-methoxyquinolines.

In recent years, molecular iodine has received considerable attention as an inexpensive, non-toxic, readily available oxidant to promote aromatization of cyclohexenone derivatives and their heterocyclic analogues. Despite the growing applications of iodine as an expedient oxidizing agent to promote oxidative aromatization of α,β-unsaturated cyclic compounds such examples feature less or not at all in literature reviews on the applications of iodine in various chemical transformation as a Lewis acid catalyst, electrophile or oxidant [16,17,18,19]. We address this need in the present review by focusing primarily on the application of molecular iodine as an oxidizing agent to effect aromatization of α,β-unsaturated cyclic compounds and their heterocyclic analogues.

2. Iodine as an Oxidant

2.1. Iodine-alcohol–mediated aromatization of cyclohexenone derivatives

The use of molecular iodine as an oxidant to promote aromatization of cyclohexenone derivatives was first reported in 1980 by Tamura and Yoshimoto [20]. These authors subjected series of cyclohexenones to iodine in refluxing methanol to afford variously substituted anisole derivatives. Their methodology was later applied by Kotnis on Hagemann’s esters 3 to afford substituted p-methoxybenzoates 4, which are building blocks for several marine natural products (Scheme 1) [21].

Scheme 1

Iodine-promoted oxidative aromatization of Hagemann’s esters.

In another development involving the use of iodine-methanol reaction mixture, Kotnis transformed a series of cyclohexane-1,3-dione derivatives 5 (for 5e; R=Ac) to substituted resorcinols 6 (Scheme 2) [9]. The only mechanistic suggestion was that 1,4-addition–elimination of methanol to the enol form of the cyclohexadione system takes place as a first step of the reaction. The author also used some of the prepared resorcinols as precursors for the synthesis of olivetol 2a and the antifungal antibiotic DB2073 2b [9].

Scheme 2

Iodine-promoted oxidative aromatization of cyclohexane-1,3-diones to anisole derivatives.

Similar reaction conditions to those previously employed by Kotnis were later applied to 3-(phosphonoalkyl)cyclohexenones 7 to afford a series of novel anisole derivatives 8 substituted at the 3-position with alkylphosphonate group (Scheme 3) [22]. The observed results were interpreted as a consequence of an initial 1,2- (independent of 1,4-) addition of methanol, followed by dehydration and iodine-promoted oxidative aromatization. The same products were also obtained from the corresponding 3-chlorocyclohexenols 9, presumably via the acid catalyzed SN2’ displacement of the allylic alcohol by methanol. Elimination of HCl would lead to the same cyclohexadiene derivative as obtained from the cylohexenone derivative and is followed by the iodine–promoted aromatization. Under similar reaction conditions applied to 7, diethyl 1-(1-hydroxy-3-methylcyclohex-2-enyl)ethylphosphonates 10 afforded the expected 3-methylbenzylphosphonates 11, as well as their 6-methoxy derivatives 12 albeit in low yields (Scheme 4) [22]. The reaction was also found to work well with cyclohexenone derivatives 13 bearing allylphosphonate moiety at the 3-position to afford novel 3-substituted anisole derivatives 14 in moderate yields (Scheme 5) [23].

Scheme 3

Iodine-promoted oxidative aromatization of 3-phosphonomethylcyclohexenones.

Scheme 4

Iodine-mediated aromatization of diethyl 1-(1-hydroxy-3-methylcyclohex-2-enyl)alkylphosphonates.

Scheme 5

Iodine-mediated aromatization of ketophosphonates 15.

Dihydrofuran 15 was previously subjected to iodine in refluxing methanol to afford the aromatized derivative 16, which is an analogue of the naturally occurring rocaglamide (Scheme 6) [24]. A one-pot iodine-methanol–mediated aromatization of cyclic diones 17 and subsequent fragmentation to anisole derivatives 18 has also been reported before (Scheme 7) [25].

Scheme 6

Iodine-methanol–mediated aromatization of dihydrofuran derivative 11.

Scheme 7

Iodine-methanol–mediated aromatization of cyclic diones.

The oxidative properties of iodine were recently exploited to effect aromatization of 2-bromomethyl-3,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofurans 19 to afford the corresponding 2-bromomethyl-4-methoxy-2,3-dihydrobenzofurans 20 (Scheme 8) [26]. Under similar reaction conditions, the analogous 2-bromo-2,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-1-benzopyran-5-ones 21 (R=H, Me) afforded the corresponding 3-bromo-5-methoxy-3,4-dihydrobenzopyran derivatives 22a (R=H) and 22b (R=Me) in 85% and 89% yields, respectively (Scheme 9). Moreover, the combined electrophilic and oxidative properties of iodine were also exploited to effect direct one-pot iodocyclization of 2-allylcyclohexane-1,3-diones and subsequent in situ oxidative aromatization of the resulting 2-iodomethyl-2,4,5,6-tetrahydrobenzofuran-4-ones to afford 2-iodomethyl-4-methoxy-2,3-dihydrobenzofurans [26].

Scheme 8

Iodine-mediated aromatization of 2-halogenomethyl-3,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran-4-ones.

Scheme 9

Iodine-mediated aromatization of 3-bromo-2,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-1-benzopyran-5-ones.

Iodine in refluxing alcohols was also employed before by Kim and co-workers on 2-acyl- and 2-propionylcyclohexane-1,3-diones 23 (Scheme 10) [27]. The 3-alkoxy-1-hydroxyacetophenone derivatives 24a-d were formed exclusively from the acetyl- and propionyl substituted starting materials 23a and 23d. The absence of dimethoxy derivatives in the case of acetyl- and propionyl substituted starting materials 23a and 23d was attributed to strong intramolecular hydrogen bonding that would prevent conversion of the hydroxyl group into methoxy group. Mixtures of mono- 24 and dimethoxy derivatives 25 were isolated when the benzoyl or carbomethoxycyclohexane-1,3-diones 23e,f, h were used as substrates. In the latter instance, the authors attributed the formation of both monomethoxy and dimethoxy derivatives to be a consequence of the weakly hydrogen bonding 2-benzoyl and 2-carbomethoxy groups. However, these authors could not account for the formation of both monomethoxy and dimethoxy derivatives when the 5-methyl substituted 2-acetylcyclohexane-1,3-dione 23g was used as a substrate.

Scheme 10

Iodine-promoted oxidative aromatization of 2-acyl- and 2-propionylcyclohexane-1,3-diones.

Treatment of benzo[b]indeno[2.1-d]furanone derivatives 26 with iodine (2 equiv.) in refluxing methanol afforded anisole derivatives 27 (minor) and 28 (major), respectively (Scheme 11) [28]. The formation of methyl derivatives 28 was rationalized as a consequence of initial acid-catalyzed dehydration of 27 to form a cyclic oxonium intermediate, which then undergoes addition of methanol [25]. The proposed mechanism was proven in a follow up study involving selective methylation of systems 27 to 28 using iodine-methanol mixture and the methylated derivatives were found to be formed selectively under prolonged heating conditions (13–36 h) [29].

Scheme 11

Iodine-methanol oxidative aromatization of benzo[b]indeno[2.1-d]furanone derivatives.

Kim and coworkers also employed iodine in refluxing methanol to effect oxidative aromatization of 4-alkylidene-2-cyclohexen-1-ones 29 to afford the corresponding anisole derivatives (Scheme 12) [30]. The mechanism of this reaction which was also confirmed using iodine (1.1 equiv.) on 29b in deuterated methanol to afford deuterated analogue of 30b (OCD3 in place of OMe) in 32% yield is believed to involve initial conjugate addition of methanol to the exo-methylene moiety followed by attack of the carbonyl carbon by methanol to generate a hemiketal derivative. Dehydration of the latter then occurs followed by iodine-promoted oxidative aromatization to yield the anisole derivatives. The fully conjugated systems 31f and 31g formed as minor products from substrates 29f and 29g are presumably the consequence of slow expulsion of methanol from the dimethoxy products. Kim’s group also subjected 2-methylene-2-cyclohexenones to iodine in alcohol (methanol or ethanol) to afford series of novel anisole derivatives [31].

Scheme 12

Iodine-methanol promoted oxidative aromatization of 4-alkylidene-2-cyclohexen-1-ones.

2-Cyclohexen-1-one and its 3-methyl derivative with iodine-cerium(IV) ammonium nitrate mixture in alcohol (methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol) previously afforded the corresponding alkyl phenyl ethers in moderate to high yields [32]. Cerium(IV) ion is believed to coordinate with the carbonyl oxygen to facilitate attack by alcohol leading to enolization, which in turn facilitates iodine-mediated oxidative aromatization to afford alkyl phenylether derivatives. 3,5,5-Trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one 32 was found to undergo methyl shift upon treatment with iodine-CAN in ethanol or n-butanol to afford the corresponding 3,4,5-trimethyl substituted phenylether derivatives 33a and b, in 89% and 90% yields, respectively (Scheme 13) [32].

Scheme 13

Iodine-CAN promoted oxidative aromatization of trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-ones.

Iodine represents a relatively less expensive reagent for oxidative aromatization of cyclohexenone moiety than metal–catalyzed aromatization of substituted cyclohexenones to the corresponding phenol ethers or phenols [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. It is also superior to the use of 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) in dioxane, which was previously employed to dehydrogenate 5-acetyl-4-oxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran and methyl-4-oxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydrobenzofuran-5-carboxylate [33].

2.2. Iodine-methanol–mediated aromatization of 4-quinolone derivatives

The use of iodine as an effective oxidant to promote oxidative aromatization of α,β-unsaturated cyclic carbonyl compounds is not only limited to cyclohexenone derivatives. Molecular iodine in refluxing methanol has also been shown to effect oxidative aromatization of 2-aryl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-4-quinolones 34 to afford analogues of the naturally occurring 4-methoxy-2-phenylquinolines 35 with potential antimalarial and anti-tuberculosis activities (Scheme 14) [11]. The mechanism of this reaction is believed to involve initial attack of the protonated quinolone by methanol to generate a hemiacetal derivative. The latter would then undergo dehydration and subsequent oxidative aromatization by iodine to afford 35.

Scheme 14

Iodine-promoted oxidative aromatization of 2-aryl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolin-4-ones.

2.3. Iodine/sodium ethoxide–mediated aromatization of cyclohexenone derivatives

Hedge and coworkers, on the other hand, used iodine and sodium ethoxide to convert 2-cyclohexenone-4-carboxylates 36 into 2-iodophenols 37 (Scheme 15) [34]. The reaction was found to be favoured by the presence of electron withdrawing carboxyl group at the 4-position and to fail in the case of simple 2-cyclohexenones (R1,R3=H; R2=alkyl or phenyl) due to reduced acidity of the 4-methine or methylene protons.

Scheme 15

Iodine-sodium ethoxide–promoted aromatization of 2-cyclohexenone-4-carboxylates.

The secondary enamines 38 (R2=H, R3=alkyl) with NaOEt (6 equiv.) and I2 (2 equiv.) in EtOH, -78 ºC, on the other hand, afforded the corresponding iodoanilines 39 (X=I) in 42–61% yield as single regioisomers (Scheme 16). Interestingly, the tertiary enamines 38 (R2,R3=alkyl, cycloalkyl) afforded the corresponding non-iodinated aromatic derivatives 39 (X=H) in 74–89% yield. The divergence in behavior of the tertiary enamines from those of 4-carboxy substituted cyclohexenones and their secondary enamine derivatives was attributed to different rates of iodination. It was proposed that the iodination of tertiary enamines is sufficiently slow to allow dehydroiodination of the incipient mono-iodo species to successfully compete with diiodination step and result in non-iodinated N,N-dialkylanilines. This proposal was further supported by oxidative aromatization of the tertiary enamine (NR2R3=morpholine) with iodine (1 equiv.) in the presence of triethylamine (2.5 equiv.) and 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU) at room temperature to afford the corresponding N,N-dialkylaniline in 56 and 63% yields, respectively.

Scheme 16

Iodine-sodium ethoxide–promoted aromatization of enamine derivatives.

2.4. Iodine–mediated aromatization of Hantzsch ester 1,4-dihydropyridines

Aromatization of Hantzsch ester 1,4-dihydropyridines using iodine in the presence of an alkali or organic base in methanol has been reported [35]. Iodine in refluxing acetonitrile is also reported to promote aromatization of the Hantzsch ester 1,4-dihydropyridines 40 to afford the corresponding pyridine derivatives 42 in high yields and regioselectivity in the absence or presence of ultrasound irradiation (Scheme 17) [36]. The 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative 40e bearing a secondary alkyl group was found to undergo aromatization accompanied by dealkylation to afford the 4-unsubstituted pyridine derivative 41e in excellent yield. The 4-unsubstituted 41 (f and g) and substituted derivatives 42 (f and g) were isolated as mixtures under both reaction conditions when 1,4-dihydropyridines bearing 2-furyl moiety on the 4-position were used as substrates. Although high yielding, aromatization of Hantzsch ester 1,4-dihydropyridines using iodine in methanol in the presence of a base [35] or under neutral conditions in acetonitrile [36] involve prolonged reaction times than that involving ultrasound (US) irradiation.

Scheme 17

Iodine-promoted aromatization of 1,4-dihydropyridines under neutral and ultrasonic irradiation conditions.

Aromatization of Hantzsch ester 1,4-dihydropyridines using iodine under conventional and ultrasonic irradiation was found to be superior to other methods that involve the use of strong oxidizing agents and severe conditions that require prolonged reaction times leading to low yields [36].

3. Conclusions

In summary, molecular iodine has established itself in chemical transformation as an efficient, readily available and easy-to-handle oxidizing agent to effect aromatization of α,β-unsaturated cyclohexenone derivatives and their heterocyclic analogues. The generality and brevity of iodine–mediated oxidative aromatization reactions and the accompanying high yields make this methodology a suitable alternative to metal–catalyzed aromatization of related derivatives. Furthermore, direct formation of phenol ethers using iodine–promoted oxidative aromatization avoids an additional step required to convert the hydroxyl compounds formed through metal-catalyzed or DDQ–mediated aromatization to the corresponding alkoxy derivatives.

	R	R1	R2	%Yield
6a	H	Me	H	87
6b	H	Ph	H	93
6c	H	n-Pr	H	86
6d	H	H	Me	83
6e	H	Ph	H	90
6f	TBS	Me	H	84

	R1	R2	%Yield
8a	H	H	71
8b	H	Me	67
8c	Me	H	60
8d	Me	Me	50

Reagents: I2 (2 equiv.), MeOH, heat, 2-3 h.

	R	%Yield of 11	%Yield of 12
a	H	12	22
b	Me	-	43
c	-CH=CH2	9	5

	R1	R2	%Yield
20a	H	H	72
20b	Me	H	65
20c	H	Me	86

Reagents: (i) I2, MeOH, heat, 3h.

	R1	R2	R3	Time (h)	%Yield 24	%Yield 25
a	H	Me	Me	17	89	-
b	H	Me	Et	15	70	-
c	H	Me	Bu	12	41	-
d	H	Et	Me	13	79	-
e	H	Ph	Me	14	28	48
f	H	OMe	Me	10	49	26
g	Me	Me	Me	20	63	9
h	Ph	Me	Me	20	50	12

Reagents: (i) I2 (2 equiv.); R”OH, heat, 12-20 h.

	R1	R2	%Yield of 27	%Yield of 28
a	H	Me	11	66
b	Me	Me	5	59
c	Ph	Me	6	52
d	H	Et	12	45

	R1	R2	R3	Time (h)	%Yield of 30	%Yield of 31
a	H	H	Ph	7	64	-
b	H	Me	Ph	1	72	-
c	H	Me	4-ClC6H4	3	88	-
d	Me	Me	4-ClC6H4	2	81	-
e	Me	Et	Ph	1	82	-
f	Me	Me	(Me)2CH	1	64	18
g	H	Me	(Me)2CH	1	64	6

	Ar	%Yield
35a	C6H5	73
35b	4-FC6H4	80
35c	4-ClC6H4	91
35d	4-BrC6H4	65
35e	4-MeOC6H4	90
35f	4-NO2C6H4	60

Reagents: (i) I2 (2 equiv.), MeOH, heat, 2h.

	R1	R2	R3	%Yield
37a	H	CO2Me	Me	66
37b	H	CO2Et	CF3	86
37c	H	CO2Et	CO2Et	77
37d	H	CO2Et	2-Thienyl	61
37e	H	CO2Me	2-Furyl	50
37f	Me	CO2Et	H	78
37g	CF3	CO2Et	H	65
37h	Ph	CO2Et	H	64

	R	R’	Time (h)a	Time (h)b	%Yielda	%Yieldb
42a	Ph	Et	5	15	96	98
42b	Ph	Me	6	20	94	96
42c	3-NO2C6H4	Et	7	30	95	95
42d	2-NO2C6H4	Me	4	40	91	94
41e	(Me)2CH	Me	1	5	96	98
42f+41f	2-Furyl	Et	5	10	60+40	70+30
42g+41g	2-Furyl	Me	5.5	15	65+35	70+30
42h	4-(MeO)C6H4	Et	3	40	93	94
42i	4-(MeO)C6H4	Me	4	45	93	94
42j	4-MeC6H4	Et	4	30	95	97
42k	4-MeC6H4	Me	4	35	95	96
42l	4-ClC6H4	Me	4	25	94	94
42m	4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl	Et	1	20	97	98

Reagents: (i) I2 (2 equiv.), CH3CN, heat; a I2 (2 equiv.), CH3CN, heat; b US irradiation.