| Literature DB >> 20032865 |
Svjetlana Kristafor1, Tatjana Gazivoda Kraljević, Damjan Makuc, Janez Plavec, Lidija Suman, Marijeta Kralj, Silvana Raić-Malić.
Abstract
The synthetic route for introduction oEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20032865 PMCID: PMC6255265 DOI: 10.3390/molecules14124866
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of C-6 alkyl and alkenyl side chain pyrimidine derivatives (4-10).
Scheme 2Synthesis of 5-phenylpyrimidine derivatives with C-6 fluorophenylalkyl side chain (13-15).
Inhibitory effects of compounds 4, 6, 8-10 and 12-15 on the growth of human tumor cell lines.
| Compd | IC50 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molt-4 | HCT 116 | SW 620 | MCF-7 | H 460 | |
| 43 ± 41 | 41 ± 10 | 32 ± 19 | 2 ± 1 | 19 ± 5 | |
| > 100 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 | |
| 78 ± 21 | 79 ± 21 | 35 ± 6 | 51 ± 18 | ± 100 | |
| > 100 | ± 100 | > 100 | > 100 | > 100 | |
| 50 ± 45 | 37 ± 0.03 | 32 ± 10 | 42 ± 1 | 75 ± 3 | |
| 6 ± 4 | 3 ± 0.3 | 2 ± 1.6 | 10 ± 6 | 4 ± 3 | |
| N.T.
| 2 ± 0.2 | 2 ± 0.2 | 3 ± 1 | 3 ± 0.1 | |
| N.T.
| 14 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 0.1 | 14 ± 3 | 17 ± 2 | |
| 2 ± 0.03 | 1 ± 0.5 | 2 ± 0.4 | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 0.4 | |
IC50; 50% inhibitory concentration, or compound concentration required to inhibit tumor cell proliferation by 50%; not tested.
Figure 1Dose-response profiles for compounds 12 and 15. PG = percentage of growth.
Figure 2Cell cycle analysis of HCT 116 cells treated with 1, 5 and 10 μM compounds 12 and 15, 24 h (A and C, respectively), or 48 h (B and D, respectively). The histograms show percentages of live cells in G0/G1, S or G2/M phase, along with the number of dead (subG1) cells, where subG1 population is expressed as a percentage of total number of measured cells/counts.
1H- and 19F-NMR chemical shifts (δ/ppm), signal multiplicities and H-H coupling constants (J/Hz).
| Compd | N1–H | N3–H | H5 | H1' | C2'–OH | C2'–Me | C5–Me | –OCH3 | phenyl | 19F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | – | – | 6.29 (s) | 15.08 (s) | – | 2.09 (s) | 3.95 (s) | 7.97 (m, Hϕ2/Hϕ6) | –110.31 (m) | |
| 7.29 (m, Hϕ3/Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| – | – | – | 4.48 (s) | – | – | 1.97 (s) | 3.75 (s), 3.91 (s) | 8.10 (m, Hϕ2/Hϕ6) | –105.21 (m) | |
| 7.37 (m, Hϕ3/Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| 10.92 (s) | 10.33 (s) | 5.37 (d) | 2.46 (d) | 4.73 (s) | 1.02 (s) | – | – | 7.14 (m, Hϕ3) | –115.83 (m) | |
| 7.27 (m, Hϕ4) | ||||||||||
| 7.14 (m, Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| 7.33 (m, Hϕ6) | ||||||||||
| 11.06 (s) | 10.59 (s) | – | 6.39 (m) | – | 2.02 (d) | 1.70 (d) | – | 7.64 (m, Hϕ2/Hϕ6) | –113.36 (m) | |
| 7.24 (m, Hϕ3/Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| 10.93 (s) | 10.33 (s) | – | 2.73 (d) 2.82 (d) | 5.52 (b) | 1.52 (s) | 1.50 (s) | – | 7.51 (m, Hϕ2/Hϕ6) | – | |
| 7.13 (m, Hϕ3/Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| – | – | – | 6.78 (q) | – | 2.43 (d) | 2.06 (s) | 3.89 (s), 3.92 (s) | 7.66 (m, Hϕ2/Hϕ6) | –113.79 (m) | |
| 7.24 (m, Hϕ3/Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| – | – | – | 6.93 (s) | 11.67 (s) | – | – | 3.79 (s) | 7.40 (m, Hϕ2/Hϕ6) | – | |
| 7.33 (m, Hϕ3/Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| 3.90 (s) | ||||||||||
| 7.22 (m, 5Hϕ) | ||||||||||
| – | – | – | 2.61 (s) | 5.19 (s) | 0.95 (s) | – | 3.80 (s) | 7.17 (m, Hϕ3) | – | |
| 7.31 (m, Hϕ4) | ||||||||||
| 7.19 (m, Hϕ5) | ||||||||||
| 3.92 (s) | ||||||||||
| 7.38 (m, Hϕ6) | ||||||||||
| 7.02 (m, 5Hϕ) |
a The 4K : 4E ratio is ca. 55 : 45 as observed in 1H and 19F NMR spectra; b4JH1’-H5 = 1.5, multiplet for H3': 2.74 (d), 2.79 (d) with 2JH gem = 13.4 Hz; c4JH1'-C2'Me = 1.2 and 5JH1'-C5Me = 0.6 Hz; d 2JH1' gem = 13.9 Hz; e4JH1'-C2'Me = 1.2 Hz; f Multiplet for H3': 2.79 (d), 2.68 (d) with 2JH gem = 13.7 Hz.
Figure 3The key NOE enhancements and configuration along C1'=C2' double bond for a) 4E, b) 8 and c) 10 in DMSO-d6 solution.