Sonal Shah1, Richard Bachur, Daniel Kim, Mark I Neuman. 1. Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA. sonalnshah@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of tachypnea as a proxy to the diagnosis of pneumonia in resource poor settings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between tachypnea and radiographic pneumonia among children evaluated in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: Prospective study of children less than 5 years of age undergoing chest radiography (CXR) for possible pneumonia was conducted in an academic pediatric ED. Tachypnea was defined using 3 different measurements: (1) mean triage respiratory rate (RR) by age group, (2) age-defined tachypnea based on WHO guidelines (<2 months [RR > or =60/min], 2 to 12 months [RR > or =50], 1 to 5 years [RR > or =40]), and (3) physician-assessed tachypnea based on clinical impression assessed before CXR. The presence of pneumonia on CXR was determined by an attending radiologist. RESULTS: A total of 1622 patients were studied, of whom, 235 (14.5%) had radiographic pneumonia. Mean triage RR among children with pneumonia (RR = 39/min) did not differ from children without pneumonia (RR = 38/min). Twenty percent of children with tachypnea as defined by WHO age-specific cut-points had pneumonia, compared with 12% of children without tachypnea (P < 0.001). Seventeen percent of children who were assessed to be tachypneic by the treating physician had pneumonia, compared with 13% of children without tachypnea (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Among an ED population of children who have a CXR performed to assess for pneumonia, RR alone, and subjective clinical impression of tachypnea did not discriminate children with and without radiographic pneumonia. However, children with tachypnea as defined by WHO RR thresholds were more likely to have pneumonia than children without tachypnea.
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of tachypnea as a proxy to the diagnosis of pneumonia in resource poor settings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between tachypnea and radiographic pneumonia among children evaluated in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: Prospective study of children less than 5 years of age undergoing chest radiography (CXR) for possible pneumonia was conducted in an academic pediatric ED. Tachypnea was defined using 3 different measurements: (1) mean triage respiratory rate (RR) by age group, (2) age-defined tachypnea based on WHO guidelines (<2 months [RR > or =60/min], 2 to 12 months [RR > or =50], 1 to 5 years [RR > or =40]), and (3) physician-assessed tachypnea based on clinical impression assessed before CXR. The presence of pneumonia on CXR was determined by an attending radiologist. RESULTS: A total of 1622 patients were studied, of whom, 235 (14.5%) had radiographic pneumonia. Mean triage RR among children with pneumonia (RR = 39/min) did not differ from children without pneumonia (RR = 38/min). Twenty percent of children with tachypnea as defined by WHO age-specific cut-points had pneumonia, compared with 12% of children without tachypnea (P < 0.001). Seventeen percent of children who were assessed to be tachypneic by the treating physician had pneumonia, compared with 13% of children without tachypnea (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Among an ED population of children who have a CXR performed to assess for pneumonia, RR alone, and subjective clinical impression of tachypnea did not discriminate children with and without radiographic pneumonia. However, children with tachypnea as defined by WHO RR thresholds were more likely to have pneumonia than children without tachypnea.
Authors: John S Bradley; Carrie L Byington; Samir S Shah; Brian Alverson; Edward R Carter; Christopher Harrison; Sheldon L Kaplan; Sharon E Mace; George H McCracken; Matthew R Moore; Shawn D St Peter; Jana A Stockwell; Jack T Swanson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Are Stuwitz Berg; Christopher Stephen Inchley; Hans Olav Fjaerli; Truls Michael Leegaard; Morten Lindbaek; Britt Nakstad Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Matthew J Lipshaw; Todd A Florin; Sara Krueger; Michael A Belsky; Thomas Epperson; Eric J Crotty; Jessi Lipscomb; Judd Jacobs; Mantosh S Rattan; Richard M Ruddy; Samir S Shah; Lilliam Ambroggio Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Florida Muro; George Mtove; Neema Mosha; Hannah Wangai; Nicole Harrison; Helena Hildenwall; David Schellenberg; Jim Todd; Raimos Olomi; Hugh Reyburn Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Matthew O Wiens; Elias Kumbakumba; Niranjan Kissoon; J Mark Ansermino; Andrew Ndamira; Charles P Larson Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Giulio Iorio; Maria Capasso; Giuseppe De Luca; Salvatore Prisco; Carlo Mancusi; Bruno Laganà; Vincenzo Comune Journal: PeerJ Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 2.984