BACKGROUND: Hypertension-related risk in urban areas may vary from national estimates; however, objective data on prevalence and treatment in local areas are scarce. We assessed hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control among New York City (NYC) adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NYC Health And Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES), modeled on the national HANES, was conducted in 2004 with a representative sample of noninstitutionalized NYC residents > or =20 years of age. Hypertension outcomes were examined with interview and examination data (n=1975). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with control among adults with hypertension. We found that 25.6% of NYC adults had hypertension. Blacks had a higher prevalence than whites (32.8% versus 21.1%, P<0.001), as did Hispanics (26.5% versus 21.1%, P<0.05). Foreign-born residents who had lived in the United States for <10 years had lower rates than those who had lived in the United States longer (20.0% versus 27.5%, P<0.05). Among adults with hypertension, 83.0% were diagnosed, 72.7% were treated, and 47.1% had hypertension controlled. Of those treated, 64.8% had hypertension controlled. After adjustment for sociodemographic variables among all adults with treated hypertension, lack of a routine place of medical care was most strongly associated with poor control levels (adjusted odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.66). Among nonelderly adults with treated hypertension, blacks had 4-fold lower odds than whites of having hypertension controlled (adjusted odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: In NYC, hypertension is common and frequently uncontrolled. Low levels of control are associated with poor access to care. Racial disparities in prevalence and control are evident among nonelderly adults.
BACKGROUND:Hypertension-related risk in urban areas may vary from national estimates; however, objective data on prevalence and treatment in local areas are scarce. We assessed hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control among New York City (NYC) adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NYC Health And Nutrition Examination Survey (HANES), modeled on the national HANES, was conducted in 2004 with a representative sample of noninstitutionalized NYC residents > or =20 years of age. Hypertension outcomes were examined with interview and examination data (n=1975). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with control among adults with hypertension. We found that 25.6% of NYC adults had hypertension. Blacks had a higher prevalence than whites (32.8% versus 21.1%, P<0.001), as did Hispanics (26.5% versus 21.1%, P<0.05). Foreign-born residents who had lived in the United States for <10 years had lower rates than those who had lived in the United States longer (20.0% versus 27.5%, P<0.05). Among adults with hypertension, 83.0% were diagnosed, 72.7% were treated, and 47.1% had hypertension controlled. Of those treated, 64.8% had hypertension controlled. After adjustment for sociodemographic variables among all adults with treated hypertension, lack of a routine place of medical care was most strongly associated with poor control levels (adjusted odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.66). Among nonelderly adults with treated hypertension, blacks had 4-fold lower odds than whites of having hypertension controlled (adjusted odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: In NYC, hypertension is common and frequently uncontrolled. Low levels of control are associated with poor access to care. Racial disparities in prevalence and control are evident among nonelderly adults.
Authors: Joel F Farley; Richard A Hansen; Marisa E Domino; Mrudula Borse; Nirosha Mahendraratnam; Neepa Ray; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Sonia Y Angell; Stella Yi; Donna Eisenhower; Bonnie D Kerker; Christine J Curtis; Katherine Bartley; Lynn D Silver; Thomas A Farley Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ashley E Giambrone; Linda M Gerber; Jesica S Rodriguez-Lopez; Chau Trinh-Shevrin; Nadia Islam; Lorna E Thorpe Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Holly C Gooding; Shannon McGinty; Tracy K Richmond; Matthew W Gillman; Alison E Field Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 5.128