OBJECTIVE: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) for glaucoma screening in high-risk populations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation of a diagnostic test for screening. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirty-three community-based volunteer participants with risk factors for glaucoma. METHODS: The optic nerve and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) of participants' eyes were scanned using the Stratus OCT. Based on an ophthalmologic examination and frequency doubling perimetry, eyes were classified into 4 categories: normal, possible glaucoma, probable glaucoma, and definitive glaucoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative likelihood ratios of the RNFL, optic disc parameters, and their combinations were calculated. RESULTS: The right eyes were retained for analyses. After excluding eyes with missing data or with poor quality scans, the data of 210 right eyes were analyzed. Six eyes had definitive glaucoma. Combining the best performing optic nerve head parameters (cup diameter or cup/disc vertical ratio or cup/disc area ratio) and RNFL parameters (superior average or inferior average or overall average) using AND-logic resulted in a sensitivity of 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-94%), specificity of 96% (95% CI, 92%-98%), a positive likelihood ratio of 17.08 (95% CI, 7.06-41.4), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.11-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: When adequate quality scans may be obtained, the Stratus has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for definitive glaucoma. Specificity is increased when parameters from both the optic nerve head and RNFL scans are combined. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) for glaucoma screening in high-risk populations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation of a diagnostic test for screening. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirty-three community-based volunteer participants with risk factors for glaucoma. METHODS: The optic nerve and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) of participants' eyes were scanned using the Stratus OCT. Based on an ophthalmologic examination and frequency doubling perimetry, eyes were classified into 4 categories: normal, possible glaucoma, probable glaucoma, and definitive glaucoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative likelihood ratios of the RNFL, optic disc parameters, and their combinations were calculated. RESULTS: The right eyes were retained for analyses. After excluding eyes with missing data or with poor quality scans, the data of 210 right eyes were analyzed. Six eyes had definitive glaucoma. Combining the best performing optic nerve head parameters (cup diameter or cup/disc vertical ratio or cup/disc area ratio) and RNFL parameters (superior average or inferior average or overall average) using AND-logic resulted in a sensitivity of 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-94%), specificity of 96% (95% CI, 92%-98%), a positive likelihood ratio of 17.08 (95% CI, 7.06-41.4), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.35 (95% CI, 0.11-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: When adequate quality scans may be obtained, the Stratus has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for definitive glaucoma. Specificity is increased when parameters from both the optic nerve head and RNFL scans are combined. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Patrick H W Chu; Yiu-fai Ng; Chi-ho To; Kwok-fai So; Brian Brown; Henry H L Chan Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Henriët Springelkamp; Kyungmoo Lee; Roger C W Wolfs; Gabriëlle H S Buitendijk; Wishal D Ramdas; Albert Hofman; Johannes R Vingerling; Caroline C W Klaver; Michael D Abràmoff; Nomdo M Jansonius Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kenman Gan; Yao Liu; Brian Stagg; Siddarth Rathi; Louis R Pasquale; Karim Damji Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Mark B Horton; Christopher J Brady; Jerry Cavallerano; Michael Abramoff; Gail Barker; Michael F Chiang; Charlene H Crockett; Seema Garg; Peter Karth; Yao Liu; Clark D Newman; Siddarth Rathi; Veeral Sheth; Paolo Silva; Kristen Stebbins; Ingrid Zimmer-Galler Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Renato Lisboa; Kaweh Mansouri; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Felipe A Medeiros Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jean-Claude Mwanza; Gary Lee; Donald L Budenz; Joshua L Warren; Michael Wall; Paul H Artes; Thomas M Callan; John G Flanagan Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Victor Koh; Yih-Chung Tham; Carol Y Cheung; Baskaran Mani; Tien Yin Wong; Tin Aung; Ching-Yu Cheng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 3.240