Literature DB >> 20031191

Were snares and traps used in the Middle Stone Age and does it matter? A review and a case study from Sibudu, South Africa.

Lyn Wadley1.   

Abstract

The concept of remote capture involved in the creation and use of snares and traps is one of several indicators that can be used for the recognition of enhanced working memory and complex cognition. It can be argued that this humble technology is a more reliable indicator of complex cognition than encounter hunting, for example with spears. It is difficult to recognize snares and traps archaeologically because they are generally made from materials that do not preserve well. To infer their presence in the past, it is therefore necessary to rely on circumstantial evidence such as mortality profiles, taxonomic diversity and high frequencies of creatures that are susceptible to capture in snares or traps. Clearly there are some problems with using snares to infer complex cognition because people do not necessarily choose meat-getting strategies with the lowest costs. Although snares make economic sense because they reduce search costs, their use by modern hunters is not associated with the type of status accorded to other means of hunting. Social demands, more than economic or environmental ones, may consequently have determined the amount of snaring and trapping that occurred in the past. Because of social attitudes, an absence of snaring need not mean that people were incapable of using this technique. At Sibudu, a South African Middle Stone Age site, snares or other non-selective capture techniques may have been used during the Howiesons Poort and perhaps also the Still Bay Industry. The circumstantial evidence consists of 1. high frequency representations of animals that prefer forested environments, including the tiny blue duiker (adult and juvenile) and the dangerous bushpig, 2. high frequencies of small mammals, 3. high taxonomic diversity and, 4. the presence of small carnivores. Importantly, the Howiesons Poort faunal assemblage is different from that in more recent Middle Stone Age occupations of the site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20031191     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  9 in total

1.  Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures?

Authors:  Francesco d'Errico; Chris B Stringer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Hunter-Gatherer Children's Object Play and Tool Use: An Ethnohistorical Analysis.

Authors:  Sheina Lew-Levy; Marc Malmdorf Andersen; Noa Lavi; Felix Riede
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  The implications of the working memory model for the evolution of modern cognition.

Authors:  Thomas Wynn; Frederick L Coolidge
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-20

4.  The Still Bay and Howiesons Poort at Sibudu and Blombos: Understanding Middle Stone Age Technologies.

Authors:  Sylvain Soriano; Paola Villa; Anne Delagnes; Ilaria Degano; Luca Pollarolo; Jeannette J Lucejko; Christopher Henshilwood; Lyn Wadley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  New Experiments and a Model-Driven Approach for Interpreting Middle Stone Age Lithic Point Function Using the Edge Damage Distribution Method.

Authors:  Benjamin J Schoville; Kyle S Brown; Jacob A Harris; Jayne Wilkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Identifying animal taxa used to manufacture bone tools during the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, South Africa: Results of a CT-rendered histological analysis.

Authors:  Justin Bradfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bows and arrows and complex symbolic displays 48,000 years ago in the South Asian tropics.

Authors:  Michelle C Langley; Noel Amano; Oshan Wedage; Siran Deraniyagala; M M Pathmalal; Nimal Perera; Nicole Boivin; Michael D Petraglia; Patrick Roberts
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Causal Cognition, Force Dynamics and Early Hunting Technologies.

Authors:  Peter Gärdenfors; Marlize Lombard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-12

9.  Technological variability at Sibudu Cave: The end of Howiesons Poort and reduced mobility strategies after 62,000 years ago.

Authors:  Paloma de la Peña; Lyn Wadley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.