Literature DB >> 20030964

A comparison of statistical selection strategies for univariate and bivariate log-linear models.

Tim Moses1, Paul W Holland.   

Abstract

In this study, eight statistical selection strategies were evaluated for selecting the parameterizations of log-linear models used to model the distributions of psychometric tests. The selection strategies included significance tests based on four chi-squared statistics (likelihood ratio, Pearson, Freeman-Tukey, and Cressie-Read) and four additional strategies (Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), consistent Akaike information criterion (CAIC), and a measure attributed to Goodman). The strategies were evaluated in simulations for different log-linear models of univariate and bivariate test-score distributions and two sample sizes. Results showed that all eight selection strategies were most accurate for the largest sample size considered. For univariate distributions, the AIC selection strategy was especially accurate for selecting the correct parameterization of a complex log-linear model and the likelihood ratio chi-squared selection strategy was the most accurate strategy for selecting the correct parameterization of a relatively simple log-linear model. For bivariate distributions, the likelihood ratio chi-squared, Freeman-Tukey chi-squared, BIC, and CAIC selection strategies had similarly high selection accuracies.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20030964     DOI: 10.1348/000711009X478580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  5 in total

1.  Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating.

Authors:  Björn Andersson; Marie Wiberg
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  The inverse problem in mathematical biology.

Authors:  Gilles Clermont; Sven Zenker
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.144

3.  The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Infection Predictive Index (LIPI): A Clinical-Immunological Tool to Predict Infections in Lupus Patients.

Authors:  Jiram Torres-Ruiz; Nancy R Mejía-Domínguez; Alejandro Zentella-Dehesa; Alfredo Ponce-de-León; Sandra Rubí Morales-Padilla; Ricardo Vázquez-Rodríguez; Mario René Alvarado-Lara; Roberto Adrián Reyna-de-la-Garza; Miguel Tapia-Rodríguez; Guillermo Juárez-Vega; Javier Merayo-Chalico; Ana Barrera-Vargas; Jorge C Alcocer-Varela; Diana Gómez-Martín
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Between-trial heterogeneity in ARDS research.

Authors:  J Juschten; P R Tuinman; T Guo; N P Juffermans; M J Schultz; S A Loer; A R J Girbes; H J de Grooth
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The relationship between obsessive compulsive beliefs and symptoms, anxiety and disgust sensitivity, and Swine Flu fears.

Authors:  Joseph Brand; Dean McKay; Michael G Wheaton; Jonathan S Abramowitz
Journal:  J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 1.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.