Literature DB >> 20030867

Breast tumour stroma is a prognostic indicator and target for therapy.

Anthony Howell1, Goran Landberg, Jonas Bergh.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20030867      PMCID: PMC2797696          DOI: 10.1186/bcr2435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


× No keyword cloud information.

The development of the breast is exquisitely sensitive to interactions between the epithelium and stroma. Experimental evidence indicates that a reduction in signalling between any of the stromal cell types (fibroblasts, macrophages, endothelial cells and adipocytes) results in reduced or absent breast development [1], although all interactions appear to be orchestrated by the epithelial cell oestrogen receptor alpha [2]. The epithelial-stromal interactions that occur in tumours are less well characterised but there is no doubt there is expansion of the stroma as well as of the epithelium during tumour development [3,4]. Recent data indicate that the prognosis after breast cancer diagnosis relates to stromal type, and experimental and clinical studies directed at modifying the stroma (for example, angiogenesis inhibitors) suggest that the stroma is a target for therapy that is worthy of further exploration Studies of separately microdissected breast stroma and epithelium from normal lobules compared with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer indicate that extensive changes in gene expression in both the epithelial and stromal compartments occur during cancer development. These data strongly support the hypothesis that performing microdissections can be less optimal for gene expression profiling studies or to exclude cancers with a prominent stroma. Some array-based studies have had a requirement of more than 50% of cancer cells in the biopsies taken for array profiling; this may result in exclusion of biologically important cancers. Compared with the intralobular stroma of the normal breast lobule, Ma and colleagues reported that 2,338 genes were upregulated and 1,234 genes were downregulated in the stroma of DCIS [5]. A further 76 genes were upregulated and 229 genes were downregulated in the stroma of invasive tumours, indicating that most of the changes had occurred in DCIS - suggesting that paracrine and endocrine influences are driving stroma formation rather than cell interactions, since the basement membrane is largely intact in DCIS. In a similar study examining stroma separated from the epithelium, Casey and colleagues demonstrated that the major changes of gene expression were upregulation of genes for the extracellular matrix and proteases in the stroma and downregulation of cytoskeletal proteins such as keratins, tubulins and adhesion molecules leading to increased cell motility in the tumour epithelium [6]. Invasive tumours have been likened to 'wounds that do not heal' [7]. In order to establish whether tumours induced gene expression similar to wounds, Chang and colleagues investigated whether they expressed the genes induced by serum in fibroblasts (the equivalent of wounding) [8,9]. The expression of 422 selected genes changed by serum in tumours was associated with a poor prognosis, whereas tumours with no change tended to have a good prognosis. In this study, although the genes were produced in serum-treated fibroblasts, they could have been expressed in epithelial cells of the tumours studied. In order to assess the prognostic and predictive significance of genes strictly of stromal origin, Finak and colleagues isolated stroma from normal lobules and tumours by laser capture microdissection, and derived a 26-gene expression signature that was a poor prognostic indicator irrespective of breast tumour subtype and standard prognostic indicators and that also indicated resistance to standard treatments [10]. The stromal signature, however, has been described to be associated with a basal type of breast cancer in three independent datasets, including the Canadian study [11]. Other gene signatures derived from the whole tumour and searched for potential stromal genes were also able to detect a poor prognosis signature [12] and to detect a stromal signature that indicated failure to respond to neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy [13]. More recently two groups have demonstrated downregulation of a protein (caveolin-1) that acts as a scaffold protein in cell surface pits or caveolae (important for signal transduction amongst other functions) in the stroma of invasive tumours and DCIS of poor prognosis [14-16]. Previous studies by the Lisanti group have shown that caveolin-1 is downregulated in fibroblasts during transformation and that recombinant expression of caveolin-1 in oncogenically transformed cells abrogates anchorage-independent growth, therefore biologically underpinning the observations in breast tumour stroma [17,18]. The stroma, as shown by mammographic density, may also be changed in the normal breast during treatment with tamoxifen. We analysed stromal change over 12 to 18 months in the IBIS I tamoxifen prevention trial and demonstrated that women who had a tamoxifen-induced reduction of breast density were less likely to develop breast cancer [19]. This is consistent with the effect of tamoxifen in the rat breast, where it reduced proteolytic enzyme activity and extracellular matrix degradation [20]. These data outlines above indicate that certain types of tumour stoma may be related to the tendency of tumours to metastasise and related to resistance of the metastases to systemic therapy. There is evidence that factors secreted by the primary tumour such as osteopontin [21] and hypoxia-induced lysyl oxidase [22], and even systemically synthesised oestrogen [23,24], can influence seeding of metastasis even before tumour cells migrate - leading to the concept of the pre-metastatic niche [25,26]. Since the primary tumour is removed at surgery, the major target for therapy is the metastatic site (or sites harbouring dormant cells). Information concerning the effect on primary tumour or normal breast stroma can come from neoadjuvant and preventive studies, respectively. Little is known concerning the configuration of stroma at metastatic sites and whether or not it is similar to stroma in the primary tumour. Studies on tumour epithelium in matched primary tumours and metastases indicate that the phenotype of tumour epithelial cells can change, and thus the stroma might also change - indicating the important need for matched-pair studies on stroma as well as the epithelium [27]. Recent reviews have highlighted the potential of the tumour stroma as a target for therapy [28-30]. Antiangiogenic therapies and possibly bisphosphonates [31] are effective agents in current use targeting the stroma. There is great interest in targeting other cells, including tumour-associated fibroblasts [32,33], macrophages and other immune cells [34,35], and the extracellular matrix, since there is strong evidence that extracellular matrix-associated cells, in contradistinction to isolated cells, may be resistant to therapy [36]. There is also interest in using altered or armed mesenchymal stem cells reinfused into the patient, which are likely to home to sites of injury such as tumours [37,38]. Alterations in the tumour stroma appear to be able to induce resistance to standard therapies as outlined above. Study of the mechanisms involved and ways to circumvent them are potentially important with respect to increased cure rates in women with breast cancer [36,39]. In conclusion, the tumour stroma in breast has been neglected in many studies. Upcoming prevention, diagnostic and therapy strategies and studies should be carried out in an unbiased way, allowing analyses of the stromal compartment in addition to the classical investigations of the epithelial cancer component.

Abbreviations

DCIS: ductal carcinoma in situ.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. [AU Query: Confirm]
  38 in total

1.  Targeting the cancer stroma with a fibroblast activation protein-activated promelittin protoxin.

Authors:  Aaron M LeBeau; W Nathaniel Brennen; Saurabh Aggarwal; Samuel R Denmeade
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 2.  Environment-mediated drug resistance: a major contributor to minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Mark B Meads; Robert A Gatenby; William S Dalton
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  First results for agents targeting cancer-related inflammation.

Authors:  Ken Garber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Changes in estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her-2/neu status with time: discordance rates between primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Reuben J Broom; Patricia A Tang; Christine Simmons; Louise Bordeleau; Anna Marie Mulligan; Frances P O'Malley; Naomi Miller; Irene L Andrulis; Darren M Brenner; Mark J Clemons
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.480

5.  Stromal caveolin-1 levels predict early DCIS progression to invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Witkiewicz; Abhijit Dasgupta; Katherine H Nguyen; Chengbao Liu; Albert J Kovatich; Gordon F Schwartz; Richard G Pestell; Federica Sotgia; Hallgeir Rui; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Efficient inhibition of SDF-1alpha-mediated chemotaxis and HIV-1 infection by novel CXCR4 antagonists.

Authors:  Yuki Iwasaki; Hirofumi Akari; Tsutomu Murakami; Sei Kumakura; Md Zahidunnabi Dewan; Mikiro Yanaka; Naoki Yamamoto
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Stromal cell expression of caveolin-1 predicts outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Erica K Sloan; Daniel R Ciocca; Normand Pouliot; Anthony Natoli; Christina Restall; Michael A Henderson; Mariel A Fanelli; Fernando D Cuello-Carrión; Francisco E Gago; Robin L Anderson
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Tamoxifen induces pleiotrophic changes in mammary stroma resulting in extracellular matrix that suppresses transformed phenotypes.

Authors:  Rhonda Hattar; Ori Maller; Shauntae McDaniel; Kirk C Hansen; Karla J Hedman; Traci R Lyons; Scott Lucia; R Storey Wilson; Pepper Schedin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Gene expression profiling of the tumor microenvironment during breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Ma; Sonika Dahiya; Elizabeth Richardson; Mark Erlander; Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds.

Authors:  Howard Y Chang; Julie B Sneddon; Ash A Alizadeh; Ruchira Sood; Rob B West; Kelli Montgomery; Jen-Tsan Chi; Matt van de Rijn; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Endorepellin evokes autophagy in endothelial cells.

Authors:  Chiara Poluzzi; Joshua Casulli; Atul Goyal; Thomas J Mercer; Thomas Neill; Renato V Iozzo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Decorin protein core affects the global gene expression profile of the tumor microenvironment in a triple-negative orthotopic breast carcinoma xenograft model.

Authors:  Simone Buraschi; Thomas Neill; Rick T Owens; Leonardo A Iniguez; George Purkins; Rajanikanth Vadigepalli; Barry Evans; Liliana Schaefer; Stephen C Peiper; Zi-Xuan Wang; Renato V Iozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Microenvironmental influences that drive progression from benign breast disease to invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena A Cichon; Amy C Degnim; Daniel W Visscher; Derek C Radisky
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 5.  Understanding the Warburg effect and the prognostic value of stromal caveolin-1 as a marker of a lethal tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Federica Sotgia; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Stephanos Pavlides; Anthony Howell; Richard G Pestell; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Who would have thought it! Influence on outcome of radiotherapy, Ki67 and stroma. Introduction to Session 5.

Authors:  Alan Rodger
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 7.  Methods of Cell Propulsion through the Local Stroma in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kerry J Davies
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-04-07

8.  Characterization of Breast Cancer Preclinical Models Reveals a Specific Pattern of Macrophage Polarization.

Authors:  David Vallerand; Gérald Massonnet; Fatima Kébir; David Gentien; Zofia Maciorowski; Pierre De la Grange; Brigitte Sigal-Zafrani; Marion Richardson; Sandrine Humbert; Aurélie Thuleau; Franck Assayag; Ludmilla de Plater; André Nicolas; Suzy Scholl; Elisabetta Marangoni; Stefan Weigand; Sergio Roman-Roman; Ariel Savina; Didier Decaudin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Targeted Therapy Modulates the Secretome of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Induce Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Melani Luque; Marta Sanz-Álvarez; Andrea Santamaría; Sandra Zazo; Ion Cristóbal; Lorena de la Fuente; Pablo Mínguez; Pilar Eroles; Ana Rovira; Joan Albanell; Juan Madoz-Gúrpide; Federico Rojo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.