Literature DB >> 20030759

Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay.

Mio Iwanaga1, Hiroshi Nittono.   

Abstract

To examine how people deal with perceivable consequences of their voluntary actions, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during a self-paced, two-choice random generation task. Sixteen participants were asked to press one of two buttons randomly at a regular but self-selected interval of once per 1-2 s. Each button press produced either a 1000-Hz or 2000-Hz tone, but participants were told that the tones were irrelevant to the task. The button-tone combinations were initially fixed, but in subsequent blocks, a button press infrequently produced the tone associated with the opposite button (p=.15). This cognitively mismatched tone elicited N2, P3, and late positive potential (or positive slow wave) of the ERP and delayed the timing of the next button press. These results suggest that action effects are difficult to ignore and that an action effect that is different from a performer's expectation may cause task disruption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20030759     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00937.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  6 in total

1.  Emotion blocks the path to learning under stereotype threat.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mangels; Catherine Good; Ronald C Whiteman; Brian Maniscalco; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Common mechanisms in error monitoring and action effect monitoring.

Authors:  Robert Steinhauser; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Markus Janczyk; Marco Steinhauser
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Prediction, cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Andreja Bubic; D Yves von Cramon; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  I know what is missing here: electrophysiological prediction error signals elicited by omissions of predicted "what" but not "when".

Authors:  Iria Sanmiguel; Katja Saupe; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.

Authors:  Álvaro Darriba; Yi-Fang Hsu; Sandrien Van Ommen; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Does the StartReact Effect Apply to First-Trial Reactive Movements?

Authors:  Katrin Sutter; Jorik Nonnekes; Valeria Dibilio; Alexander C Geurts; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.