Literature DB >> 20030368

Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential.

Kelli G Roberts1, Brent A Gloy, Stephen Joseph, Norman R Scott, Johannes Lehmann.   

Abstract

Biomass pyrolysis with biochar returned to soil is a possible strategy for climate change mitigation and reducing fossil fuel consumption. Pyrolysis with biochar applied to soils results in four coproducts: long-term carbon (C) sequestration from stable C in the biochar, renewable energy generation, biochar as a soil amendment, and biomass waste management. Life cycle assessment was used to estimate the energy and climate change impacts and the economics of biochar systems. The feedstocks analyzed represent agricultural residues (corn stover), yard waste, and switchgrass energy crops. The net energy of the system is greatest with switchgrass (4899 MJ t(-1) dry feedstock). The net greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for both stover and yard waste are negative, at -864 and -885 kg CO(2) equivalent (CO(2)e) emissions reductions per tonne dry feedstock, respectively. Of these total reductions, 62-66% are realized from C sequestration in the biochar. The switchgrass biochar-pyrolysis system can be a net GHG emitter (+36 kg CO(2)e t(-1) dry feedstock), depending on the accounting method for indirect land-use change impacts. The economic viability of the pyrolysis-biochar system is largely dependent on the costs of feedstock production, pyrolysis, and the value of C offsets. Biomass sources that have a need for waste management such as yard waste have the highest potential for economic profitability (+$69 t(-1) dry feedstock when CO(2)e emission reductions are valued at $80 t(-1) CO(2)e). The transportation distance for feedstock creates a significant hurdle to the economic profitability of biochar-pyrolysis systems. Biochar may at present only deliver climate change mitigation benefits and be financially viable as a distributed system using waste biomass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20030368     DOI: 10.1021/es902266r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  25 in total

1.  Climate-smart soils.

Authors:  Keith Paustian; Johannes Lehmann; Stephen Ogle; David Reay; G Philip Robertson; Pete Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Biochars derived from giant reed (Arundo donax L.) with different treatment: characterization and ammonium adsorption potential.

Authors:  Yaqi Zhao; Lei Huang; Yucheng Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mitigating global warming potentials of methane and nitrous oxide gases from rice paddies under different irrigation regimes.

Authors:  Muhammad Aslam Ali; M Anamul Hoque; Pil Joo Kim
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Effects of the biochar aromaticity and molecular structures of the chlorinated organic compounds on the adsorption characteristics.

Authors:  Lu Han; Linbo Qian; Jingchun Yan; Mengfang Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The influence of sunlight and oxidative treatment on measured PAH concentrations in biochar.

Authors:  Fathima N M Khalid; Doug Klarup
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Feasibility of biochar application on a landfill final cover-a review on balancing ecology and shallow slope stability.

Authors:  Xun-Wen Chen; James Tsz-Fung Wong; Charles Wang-Wai Ng; Ming-Hung Wong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Insight into Multiple and Multilevel Structures of Biochars and Their Potential Environmental Applications: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Xin Xiao; Baoliang Chen; Zaiming Chen; Lizhong Zhu; Jerald L Schnoor
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?

Authors:  Pete Smith; Katherine Calvin; Johnson Nkem; Donovan Campbell; Francesco Cherubini; Giacomo Grassi; Vladimir Korotkov; Anh Le Hoang; Shuaib Lwasa; Pamela McElwee; Ephraim Nkonya; Nobuko Saigusa; Jean-Francois Soussana; Miguel Angel Taboada; Frances C Manning; Dorothy Nampanzira; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Matteo Vizzarri; Jo House; Stephanie Roe; Annette Cowie; Mark Rounsevell; Almut Arneth
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 13.211

Review 9.  A systematic review of biochar research, with a focus on its stability in situ and its promise as a climate mitigation strategy.

Authors:  Noel P Gurwick; Lisa A Moore; Charlene Kelly; Patricia Elias
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Carbon myopia: The urgent need for integrated social, economic and environmental action in the livestock sector.

Authors:  Matthew Tom Harrison; Brendan Richard Cullen; Dianne Elizabeth Mayberry; Annette Louise Cowie; Franco Bilotto; Warwick Brabazon Badgery; Ke Liu; Thomas Davison; Karen Michelle Christie; Albert Muleke; Richard John Eckard
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 13.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.