Literature DB >> 20029369

Update on the Keio collection of Escherichia coli single-gene deletion mutants.

Natsuko Yamamoto, Kenji Nakahigashi, Tomoko Nakamichi, Mihoko Yoshino, Yuki Takai, Yae Touda, Akemi Furubayashi, Satoko Kinjyo, Hitomi Dose, Miki Hasegawa, Kirill A Datsenko, Toru Nakayashiki, Masaru Tomita, Barry L Wanner, Hirotada Mori.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20029369      PMCID: PMC2824493          DOI: 10.1038/msb.2009.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Syst Biol        ISSN: 1744-4292            Impact factor:   11.429


× No keyword cloud information.
The Keio collection (Baba ) has been established as a set of single-gene deletion mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. These mutants have a precisely designed deletion from the second codon from the seventh to the last codon of each predicted ORF. Further information is available at http://sal.cs.purdue.edu:8097/GB7/index.jsp or http://ecoli.naist.jp/. The distribution is now being handled by the National Institute of Genetics of Japan (http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/ecoli/pec/index.jsp). To date more than 4 million samples have been distributed worldwide. As we described earlier (Baba ), gene amplification during construction is likely to have led to a small number of mutants with genetic duplications. The design of the Keio deletions was based on annotations that are now outdated. Of 4288 ORFs targeted, mutants were obtained for 3985 (Baba ). Re-annotation based on highly accurate sequencing of E. coli K-12 (Hayashi ) led to changing many coding regions and the total number of ORFs to 4296, including pseudogenes (Riley ) (Supplementary Table I). The recent E. coli K-12 MG1655 GenBank record (U0096, released in December 2008) has an additional 97 ORFs (exclusive of the ORFs in IS elements, Supplementary Table II) that were not targeted. Of these 4214 annotated ORFs, 4186 were targeted for deletion and 28 were not (Supplementary Table III), which resulted in the isolation of two independent mutants for 3864 targeted ORFs. No deletion was found for 299 ORFs, which are candidates for essential genes. Deletions were also isolated for 23 other ORFs; however, re-annotation led to re-classification of these ORFs as ‘split ORFs', because their coding regions are interrupted by an IS element or some other mutation (Supplementary Table IV). To identify mutants with partial duplications, we performed two sets of PCR reactions on both representatives of all 3864 mutants. In the first set, we tested for the presence of the targeted gene by using a pair of internal gene-specific primers (Figure 1A and B). With the parental strain E. coli K-12 BW25113, we were able to amplify 3803 ORFs, as indicated by the presence of PCR products of the expected sizes. For 61 ORFs, we used a pair of external primers that flanked the targeted gene either because the length of the initial PCR product was too short or because the internal primer pair failed to amplify fragments of the predicted sizes for the parental control strain. Results from testing 7728 strains (3864 ORFs) showed that the vast majority (96.1%, 7428/7728) are correct; results in Supplementary Table V show that one or both isolates are correct for 98.3% (3800/3864) of the Keio mutants (Figure 1C). As one isolate is correct for 177 ORFs for which the other isolate is ambiguous, no further tests were done with the other isolate of these mutants.
Figure 1

Identification of Keio collection mutants with partial duplications. (A) Primer design. The upper branch shows the expected structure of a single-gene mutant. The targeted ORF is replaced with the kanamycin resistance gene (kan). The lower branch shows the structure of the targeted gene. Small green boxes show the priming sites used to validate the genomic structures. Small red boxes represent priming sites for external primers (up, down) and internal primers (l, r) that were used to validate the deletion structure and presence or absence of partial duplications. (B) Confirmation by electrophoresis. Electrophoregrams showing the amplified fragments using internal primers (first PCR screen) and external primers (second PCR screen). (C) Results of evaluation. A total of 7728 mutants (two for each of the 3864 ORFs) were evaluated, as described in the text. Both isolates were validated for 3623 mutants (green). For 177, one was validated and the other was not further examined (pale green). The first set of PCR reactions failed for six ORFs (grey), for which multiple copies exist for the respective gene, e.g., an IS-encoded gene (NA, not available). For 33 mutants (yellow), the microplate sample wells contain mixtures (due to contamination), from which the correct mutant can be isolated by colony purification. Partial duplications were found for 25 mutants (red). Mutants with partial duplications are listed in Table I.

Mutants of the remaining 58 ORFs (33 with mixtures and 25 with duplications; Figure 1C) were tested in a second set of PCR reactions, which was carried out using external primers flanking the targeted gene (Figure 1A and B). A positive result in the first PCR test can occur not only from mutants with a partial duplication but also from ones that have been cross-contaminated from a nearby microplate well. Therefore, the second set of PCR tests was performed on three colonies after colony purification. In the second PCR test, colonies with the correct deletion or from a cross-contaminant mutant were expected to yield a single PCR product of length corresponding to the expected structure of the respective single-gene mutant or the structure of the targeted gene, respectively. In contrast, mutants with both the respective single-gene deletion and a genetic duplication were expected to yield both PCR products. In cases wherein the sizes of the predicted PCR products were indistinguishable for the deletion and wild-type structures, the PCR products were digested with XbaI before size separation by electrophoresis, which cuts within the kan (kanamycin resistance gene) replacement gene. For 33 of the 58 ORFs, one or more colonies yielded a single PCR product of size corresponding to the single-gene deletion, indicating that the wells for these mutants were cross-contaminated (Supplementary Table V). For the 25 other mutants, purified colonies consistently produced PCR fragments corresponding to structures for both the single-gene deletion and targeted, indicating that these mutants have partial duplications (Figure 1C and Table I). As mentioned above, our PCR tests also revealed 177 mutants, for which we showed that only one isolate is correct. Further testing of these ambiguous mutants by our second PCR test revealed that most of them do not carry a partial duplication.
Table 1

Keio mutants with partial duplications for both isolates

GeneECKJWbPECaFCbDescription
aEssentiality from PEC (Profiling of E. coli chromosome database, http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/ecoli/pec/index.jsp).
bFraction of correct single-gene deletion candidates upon Keio collection construction (Baba et al, 2006).
(A) New essential gene candidates
alaSECK2692JW2667b2697E2/8Alanyl-tRNA synthetase
coaAECK3966JW3942b3974E2/8Pantothenate kinase
coaEECK0103JW0100b0103E2/8Dephospho-CoA kinase
dnaGECK3056JW3038b3066E2/8DNA primase
glmMECK3165JW3143b3176E7/8Phosphoglucosamine mutase
glySECK3547JW3530b3559E2/8Glycine tRNA synthetase, beta subunit
groELECK4137JW4103b4143E2/8Cpn60 chaperonin GroEL
ileSECK0027JW0024b0026E2/8Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase
parCECK3010JW2987b3019E2/8DNA topoisomerase IV, subunit A
prfBECK2886JW5847b2891E5/8Peptide chain release factor RF-2
polAECK3855JW3835b3863E2/8DNA polymerase I
rhoECK3775JW3756b3783E6/8Transcription termination factor
rpoDECK3057JW3039b3067E5/8RNA polymerase, sigma 70 (sigma D) factor
yhbGECK3190JW3168b3201E2/8Lipopolysaccharide export system ATP-binding protein
       
(B) Genes whose essentiality is uncertain
btuBECK3958JW3938b3966N4/8Vitamin B12/cobalamin outer membrane transporter
djlBECK0639JW0641b0646N8/8Predicted chaperone
folPECK3166JW3144b3177N7/87,8-Dihydropteroate synthase
hemEECK3989JW3961b3997N3/8Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase
priBECK4197JW4159b4201N3/8Primosomal protein N
rplKECK3974JW3946b3983N4/850S ribosomal subunit protein L11
rplYECK2179JW2173b2185N8/850S ribosomal subunit protein L25
rpsOECK3154JW3134b3165N2/830S ribosomal subunit protein S15
rpsUECK3055JW3037b3065N3/830S ribosomal subunit protein S21
tprECK1224JW1219b12292/8Predicted protamine-like protein
yiaDECK3539JW5657b3552N2/8Predicted outer membrane lipoprotein
The 25 ORFs for which both isolates have duplications are candidates for essential genes (Table I). Fourteen of these have been reported to be essential in the PEC (Profiling of E. coli Chromosome) database (http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/ecoli/pec/index.jsp; Table IA). Thus, it is likely that these 14 genes are essential. The other 11 with partial duplications have been designated as non-essential genes in the PEC database (Table IB). Further tests are required to validate their essentiality. We also carefully evaluated all single-gene deletion mutants in the Keio collection, which were classified as essential in the PEC database. None provided evidence of a partial duplication. Thus, some ORFs reported as essential in the PEC database are nonessential, at least not in the genetic background of our host E. coli K-12 BW25113 during aerobic growth at 37°C on LB agar. It should be noted that no evidence exists that the Red system that we used to generate the Keio collection is responsible for causing duplications. Besides, other authors have shown that genetic duplications can occur during DNA replication (Anderson and Roth, 1981). As a cautionary note, partial duplications can occur not only during the construction of single-gene deletion but also upon transfer of the deletion into a new host, e.g., by PCR or transduction as reported previously (Zhou ). Construction and evaluation of Keio collection. genes that ECK numbers were not assigned before Keio construction genes that were not targets of Keio construction Mutants for split ORFs of ancestral genes Information on Keio collection deletion mutants
  5 in total

1.  Phenotype microarray analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 mutants with deletions of all two-component systems.

Authors:  Lu Zhou; Xiang-He Lei; Barry R Bochner; Barry L Wanner
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Spontaneous tandem genetic duplications in Salmonella typhimurium arise by unequal recombination between rRNA (rrn) cistrons.

Authors:  P Anderson; J Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Escherichia coli K-12: a cooperatively developed annotation snapshot--2005.

Authors:  Monica Riley; Takashi Abe; Martha B Arnaud; Mary K B Berlyn; Frederick R Blattner; Roy R Chaudhuri; Jeremy D Glasner; Takashi Horiuchi; Ingrid M Keseler; Takehide Kosuge; Hirotada Mori; Nicole T Perna; Guy Plunkett; Kenneth E Rudd; Margrethe H Serres; Gavin H Thomas; Nicholas R Thomson; David Wishart; Barry L Wanner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Highly accurate genome sequences of Escherichia coli K-12 strains MG1655 and W3110.

Authors:  Koji Hayashi; Naoki Morooka; Yoshihiro Yamamoto; Katsutoshi Fujita; Katsumi Isono; Sunju Choi; Eiichi Ohtsubo; Tomoya Baba; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori; Takashi Horiuchi
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.429

5.  Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection.

Authors:  Tomoya Baba; Takeshi Ara; Miki Hasegawa; Yuki Takai; Yoshiko Okumura; Miki Baba; Kirill A Datsenko; Masaru Tomita; Barry L Wanner; Hirotada Mori
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.429

  5 in total
  115 in total

1.  Phenotypic landscape of a bacterial cell.

Authors:  Robert J Nichols; Saunak Sen; Yoe Jin Choo; Pedro Beltrao; Matylda Zietek; Rachna Chaba; Sueyoung Lee; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Karis J Lee; Angela Wong; Michael Shales; Susan Lovett; Malcolm E Winkler; Nevan J Krogan; Athanasios Typas; Carol A Gross
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Iron-Dependent Regulation of Molybdenum Cofactor Biosynthesis Genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Zupok; Michal Gorka; Beata Siemiatkowska; Aleksandra Skirycz; Silke Leimkühler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Quantitative assessment of thermodynamic constraints on the solution space of genome-scale metabolic models.

Authors:  Joshua J Hamilton; Vivek Dwivedi; Jennifer L Reed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Distinct XPPX sequence motifs induce ribosome stalling, which is rescued by the translation elongation factor EF-P.

Authors:  Lauri Peil; Agata L Starosta; Jürgen Lassak; Gemma C Atkinson; Kai Virumäe; Michaela Spitzer; Tanel Tenson; Kirsten Jung; Jaanus Remme; Daniel N Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The EcoCyc Database.

Authors:  Peter D Karp; Wai Kit Ong; Suzanne Paley; Richard Billington; Ron Caspi; Carol Fulcher; Anamika Kothari; Markus Krummenacker; Mario Latendresse; Peter E Midford; Pallavi Subhraveti; Socorro Gama-Castro; Luis Muñiz-Rascado; César Bonavides-Martinez; Alberto Santos-Zavaleta; Amanda Mackie; Julio Collado-Vides; Ingrid M Keseler; Ian Paulsen
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2018-11

6.  Antibiotic sensitivity profiles determined with an Escherichia coli gene knockout collection: generating an antibiotic bar code.

Authors:  Anne Liu; Lillian Tran; Elinne Becket; Kim Lee; Laney Chinn; Eunice Park; Katherine Tran; Jeffrey H Miller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  A vector library for silencing central carbon metabolism genes with antisense RNAs in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Nobutaka Nakashima; Satoshi Ohno; Katsunori Yoshikawa; Hiroshi Shimizu; Tomohiro Tamura
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Deciphering the regulatory genome of Escherichia coli, one hundred promoters at a time.

Authors:  William T Ireland; Suzannah M Beeler; Emanuel Flores-Bautista; Nicholas S McCarty; Tom Röschinger; Nathan M Belliveau; Michael J Sweredoski; Annie Moradian; Justin B Kinney; Rob Phillips
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  The attachment process and physiological properties of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on quartz.

Authors:  Liliang Wang; Yichao Wu; Peng Cai; Qiaoyun Huang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Polynucleotide phosphorylase plays an important role in the generation of spontaneous mutations in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Elinne Becket; Lawrence Tse; Madeline Yung; Alexander Cosico; Jeffrey H Miller
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.