PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between maximum strength and differences in jump height during weighted and unweighted (body weight) static (SJ) and countermovement jumps (CMJ). METHODS: Sixty-three collegiate athletes (mean +/- SD; age= 19.9 +/- 1.3 y; body mass = 72.9 +/- 19.6 kg; height = 172.8 +/- 7.7 cm) performed two trials of the SJ and CMJ with 0 kg and 20 kg on a force plate; and two trials of mid-thigh isometric clean pulls in a custom rack over a force plate (1000-Hz sampling). Jump height (JH) was calculated from flight time. Force-time curve analyses determined the following: isometric peak force (IPF), isometric force (IF) at 50, 90, and 250 ms, and isometric rates of force development (IRFD). Absolute and allometric scaled forces, [absolute force/(body mass(0.67))], were used in correlations. RESULTS: IPF, IRFD, F50(a), F50, F90, and F250 showed moderate/strong correlations with SJ and CMJ height percent decrease from 0 to 20 kg. IPF(a) and F250(a) showed weak/moderate correlations with percent height decrease. Comparing strongest (n = 6) to weakest (n = 6): t tests revealed that stronger athletes (IPF(a)) performed superior to weaker athletes. CONCLUSION: Data indicate the ability to produce higher peak and instantaneous forces and IRFD is related to JH and to smaller differences between weighted and unweighted jump heights. Stronger athletes jump higher and show smaller decrements in JH with load. A weighted jump may be a practical method of assessing relative strength levels.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between maximum strength and differences in jump height during weighted and unweighted (body weight) static (SJ) and countermovement jumps (CMJ). METHODS: Sixty-three collegiate athletes (mean +/- SD; age= 19.9 +/- 1.3 y; body mass = 72.9 +/- 19.6 kg; height = 172.8 +/- 7.7 cm) performed two trials of the SJ and CMJ with 0 kg and 20 kg on a force plate; and two trials of mid-thigh isometric clean pulls in a custom rack over a force plate (1000-Hz sampling). Jump height (JH) was calculated from flight time. Force-time curve analyses determined the following: isometric peak force (IPF), isometric force (IF) at 50, 90, and 250 ms, and isometric rates of force development (IRFD). Absolute and allometric scaled forces, [absolute force/(body mass(0.67))], were used in correlations. RESULTS: IPF, IRFD, F50(a), F50, F90, and F250 showed moderate/strong correlations with SJ and CMJ height percent decrease from 0 to 20 kg. IPF(a) and F250(a) showed weak/moderate correlations with percent height decrease. Comparing strongest (n = 6) to weakest (n = 6): t tests revealed that stronger athletes (IPF(a)) performed superior to weaker athletes. CONCLUSION: Data indicate the ability to produce higher peak and instantaneous forces and IRFD is related to JH and to smaller differences between weighted and unweighted jump heights. Stronger athletes jump higher and show smaller decrements in JH with load. A weighted jump may be a practical method of assessing relative strength levels.
Authors: Josh L Secomb; Sophia Nimphius; Oliver R L Farley; Lina E Lundgren; Tai T Tran; Jeremy M Sheppard Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: George K Beckham; Timothy J Suchomel; Christopher J Sole; Christopher A Bailey; Jacob L Grazer; Steven B Kim; Kasie B Talbot; Michael H Stone Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Hagen Hartmann; Klaus Wirth; Michael Keiner; Christoph Mickel; Andre Sander; Elena Szilvas Journal: Sports Med Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Astrid M Horstman; C J de Ruiter; N T L van Duijnhoven; M T E Hopman; A de Haan Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Mark A South; Andrew S Layne; Charles A Stuart; N Travis Triplett; Michael Ramsey; Mary E Howell; William A Sands; Satoshi Mizuguchi; W Guy Hornsby; Ashley A Kavanaugh; Michael H Stone Journal: J Strength Cond Res Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.775