OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the longitudinal association between self-rated health (SRH) and timed gait, an indicator of lower extremity dysfunction, in a community-based sample of older persons. METHODS: Participants (N = 754) were evaluated at 18-month intervals for 72 months. SRH was categorized as Excellent/Very Good/Good and Fair/Poor. Participants were asked to walk a 10-foot course "as fast as it feels safe and comfortable," turn around, and walk back, with timed gait defined as normal (≤10 s) or slow (>10 s). Generalized multinomial logit models, adjusted for demographic features, biomedical and psychosocial factors, and activities of daily living, evaluated the association between SRH and the likelihood of 6 possible transitions (from normal or slow timed gait to normal timed gait, slow timed gait, or death) over time. We also ran a repeated measures linear mixed model with change in timed gait as the outcome. RESULTS: Compared with participants reporting Excellent/Very Good/Good SRH, those reporting Fair/Poor SRH were more likely to transition from normal to slow timed gait or to death. SRH was not associated with transitions from slow timed gait to normal timed gait or to death. In addition, time to complete the gait task increased (i.e., slowed) over time among participants reporting Fair/Poor SRH compared with those reporting Excellent/Very Good/Good SRH. DISCUSSION: Among older persons, SRH is associated with the development of lower extremity dysfunction but not with recovery from lower extremity dysfunction. This relationship may indicate an intermediate step in the pathway from SRH to mortality.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the longitudinal association between self-rated health (SRH) and timed gait, an indicator of lower extremity dysfunction, in a community-based sample of older persons. METHODS:Participants (N = 754) were evaluated at 18-month intervals for 72 months. SRH was categorized as Excellent/Very Good/Good and Fair/Poor. Participants were asked to walk a 10-foot course "as fast as it feels safe and comfortable," turn around, and walk back, with timed gait defined as normal (≤10 s) or slow (>10 s). Generalized multinomial logit models, adjusted for demographic features, biomedical and psychosocial factors, and activities of daily living, evaluated the association between SRH and the likelihood of 6 possible transitions (from normal or slow timed gait to normal timed gait, slow timed gait, or death) over time. We also ran a repeated measures linear mixed model with change in timed gait as the outcome. RESULTS: Compared with participants reporting Excellent/Very Good/Good SRH, those reporting Fair/Poor SRH were more likely to transition from normal to slow timed gait or to death. SRH was not associated with transitions from slow timed gait to normal timed gait or to death. In addition, time to complete the gait task increased (i.e., slowed) over time among participants reporting Fair/Poor SRH compared with those reporting Excellent/Very Good/Good SRH. DISCUSSION: Among older persons, SRH is associated with the development of lower extremity dysfunction but not with recovery from lower extremity dysfunction. This relationship may indicate an intermediate step in the pathway from SRH to mortality.
Authors: Graziano Onder; Brenda W J H Penninx; Luigi Ferrucci; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Marco Pahor Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jessica V V Brewer; Gavin S Miyasato; Margaret A Gates; Teresa M Curto; Susan A Hall; John B McKinlay Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Jeffrey M Ashburner; Jane A Cauley; Peggy Cawthon; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc C Hochberg; Lisa Fredman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Solveig A Arnadottir; Elin D Gunnarsdottir; Hans Stenlund; Lillemor Lundin-Olsson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Marc N Jarczok; Marcus E Kleber; Julian Koenig; Adrian Loerbroks; Raphael M Herr; Kristina Hoffmann; Joachim E Fischer; Yael Benyamini; Julian F Thayer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Willa D Brenowitz; Rebecca A Hubbard; Paul K Crane; Shelly L Gray; Oleg Zaslavsky; Eric B Larson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 3.240