Sue C Kaste1, George L Waszilycsak, M Beth McCarville, Najat C Daw. 1. Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee School of Health Science Center, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Mailstop 220, Memphis, TN 38105, USA. sue.kaste@stjude.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Little information is available regarding doses of ionizing radiation from medical imaging in the growing population of children undergoing therapy for cancer who are at risk of developing second cancers. The purpose of our study was to estimate the potential excess lifetime cancer incidence and mortality associated with thallium bone imaging in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric patients treated between August 1991 and December 2003 for newly diagnosed osteosarcoma who underwent 201Tl imaging as part of the treatment protocol. According to age at diagnosis and doses of 201Tl, we estimated the excess cancer incidence and cancer mortality for boys and girls at 5 and 15 years old. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 73 patients, 32 males (median age at diagnosis, 14.8 years; age range, 8.1-20.1 years) and 41 females (median age at diagnosis, 13.3 years; age range, 6.0-20.7 years). Patients underwent a total of three 201Tl studies with a median dose of 4.4 mCi (162.8 MBq) (range, 2.2-8.4 mCi [81.4-310.8 MBq]) per study. Total median cumulative patient radiation dose for 201Tl studies was 18.6 rem (186 mSv) (range, 8.4-44.2 rem [84-442 mSv]) for males and 21.5 rem (215 mSv) (range, 7.0-43.8 rem [70-438 mSv]) for females. Estimated excess cancer incidence was 6.0 per 100 (male) and 13.0 per 100 (female) if exposed by 5 years of age; 2.0 per 100 (male) and 3.1 per 100 (female) by 15 years of age. Estimated excess cancer mortality was 3.0 per 100 for males and 5.2 per 100 for females at 5 years of age; 1.0 per 100 (male) and 1.4 per 100 (female) exposed at 15 years of age. CONCLUSION: Further reduction of doses in younger patients is needed to consider 201Tl a viable option for imaging osteosarcoma.
OBJECTIVE: Little information is available regarding doses of ionizing radiation from medical imaging in the growing population of children undergoing therapy for cancer who are at risk of developing second cancers. The purpose of our study was to estimate the potential excess lifetime cancer incidence and mortality associated with thallium bone imaging in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pediatric patients treated between August 1991 and December 2003 for newly diagnosed osteosarcoma who underwent 201Tl imaging as part of the treatment protocol. According to age at diagnosis and doses of 201Tl, we estimated the excess cancer incidence and cancer mortality for boys and girls at 5 and 15 years old. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 73 patients, 32 males (median age at diagnosis, 14.8 years; age range, 8.1-20.1 years) and 41 females (median age at diagnosis, 13.3 years; age range, 6.0-20.7 years). Patients underwent a total of three 201Tl studies with a median dose of 4.4 mCi (162.8 MBq) (range, 2.2-8.4 mCi [81.4-310.8 MBq]) per study. Total median cumulative patientradiation dose for 201Tl studies was 18.6 rem (186 mSv) (range, 8.4-44.2 rem [84-442 mSv]) for males and 21.5 rem (215 mSv) (range, 7.0-43.8 rem [70-438 mSv]) for females. Estimated excess cancer incidence was 6.0 per 100 (male) and 13.0 per 100 (female) if exposed by 5 years of age; 2.0 per 100 (male) and 3.1 per 100 (female) by 15 years of age. Estimated excess cancer mortality was 3.0 per 100 for males and 5.2 per 100 for females at 5 years of age; 1.0 per 100 (male) and 1.4 per 100 (female) exposed at 15 years of age. CONCLUSION: Further reduction of doses in younger patients is needed to consider 201Tl a viable option for imaging osteosarcoma.
Authors: Paul A Meyers; Cindy L Schwartz; Mark Krailo; Eugenie S Kleinerman; Donna Betcher; Mark L Bernstein; Ernest Conrad; William Ferguson; Mark Gebhardt; Allen M Goorin; Michael B Harris; John Healey; Andrew Huvos; Michael Link; Joseph Montebello; Helen Nadel; Michael Nieder; Judith Sato; Gene Siegal; Michael Weiner; Robert Wells; Lester Wold; Richard Womer; Holcombe Grier Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W H Meyer; C B Pratt; C A Poquette; B N Rao; D M Parham; N M Marina; A S Pappo; H H Mahmoud; J J Jenkins; J Harper; M Neel; B D Fletcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-01-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gaston K Rivera; Juan Quintana; Milena Villarroel; Victor M Santana; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Michael D Neel; George Velez; Raul C Ribeiro; Najat C Daw Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Michael T Munley; Joseph E Moore; Matthew C Walb; Scott P Isom; John D Olson; J Gregory Zora; Nancy D Kock; Kenneth T Wheeler; Mark Steven Miller Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 2.841