Literature DB >> 20028768

Three DNA methylation epigenotypes in human colorectal cancer.

Koichi Yagi1, Kiwamu Akagi, Hiroshi Hayashi, Genta Nagae, Shingo Tsuji, Takayuki Isagawa, Yutaka Midorikawa, Yoji Nishimura, Hirohiko Sakamoto, Yasuyuki Seto, Hiroyuki Aburatani, Atsushi Kaneda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whereas the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer associates with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high and BRAF-mutation(+), the existence of an intermediate-methylation subgroup associated with KRAS-mutation(+) is controversial, and suitable markers for the subgroup have yet to be developed. Our aim is to clarify DNA methylation epigenotypes of colorectal cancer more comprehensively. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: To select new methylation markers on a genome-wide scale, we did methylated DNA immunoprecipitation-on-chip analysis of colorectal cancer cell lines and re-expression array analysis by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine/Trichostatin A treatment. Methylation levels were analyzed quantitatively in 149 colorectal cancer samples using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Colorectal cancer was epigenotyped by unsupervised two-way hierarchical clustering method.
RESULTS: Among 1,311 candidate silencing genes, 44 new markers were selected and underwent quantitative methylation analysis in colorectal cancer samples together with 16 previously reported markers. Colorectal cancer was clustered into high-, intermediate-, and low-methylation epigenotypes. Methylation markers were clustered into two major groups: group 1 showing methylation in high-methylation epigenotype, and group 2 showing methylation in high- and intermediate-methylation epigenotypes. A two-step marker panel deciding epigenotypes was developed with 95% accuracy: the 1st panel consisting of three group-1 markers (CACNA1G, LOX, SLC30A10) to extract high-methylation epigenotype, and the 2nd panel consisting of four group-2 markers (ELMO1, FBN2, THBD, HAND1) and SLC30A10 again to divide the remains into intermediate- and low-methylation epigenotypes. The high-methylation epigenotype correlated significantly with MSI-high and BRAF-mutation(+) in concordance with reported CIMP. Intermediate-epigenotype significantly correlated with KRAS-mutation(+). KRAS-mutation(+) colorectal cancer with intermediate-methylation epigenotype showed significantly worse prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Three methylation epigenotypes exist in colorectal cancer, and suitable classification markers have been developed. Intermediate-methylation epigenotype with KRAS-mutation(+) correlated with worse prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20028768     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  109 in total

Review 1.  Identification of driver and passenger DNA methylation in cancer by epigenomic analysis.

Authors:  Satish Kalari; Gerd P Pfeifer
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.944

2.  The prognostic relevance of primary tumor sidedness to surgical treatment for recurrent colon cancer.

Authors:  Tairin Uchino; Akira Ouchi; Koji Komori; Takashi Kinoshita; Taihei Oshiro; Tsuyoshi Sano; Yasuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Epigenetics and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Victoria Valinluck Lao; William M Grady
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Novel application of structural equation modeling to correlation structure analysis of CpG island methylation in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Noriko Tanaka; Curtis Huttenhower; Katsuhiko Nosho; Yoshifumi Baba; Kaori Shima; John Quackenbush; Kevin M Haigis; Edward Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  DNA Hypomethylating Drugs in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Takahiro Sato; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Patricia Kropf
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  Molecular and prognostic heterogeneity of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The association of age and race and the risk of large bowel polyps.

Authors:  Kristin Wallace; Carol A Burke; Dennis J Ahnen; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert S Bresalier; Fred Saibil; John A Baron
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Subtypes of the Type II Pit Pattern Reflect Distinct Molecular Subclasses in the Serrated Neoplastic Pathway.

Authors:  Hironori Aoki; Eiichiro Yamamoto; Hiro-O Yamano; Tamotsu Sugai; Tomoaki Kimura; Yoshihito Tanaka; Hiro-O Matsushita; Kenjiro Yoshikawa; Ryo Takagi; Eiji Harada; Michiko Nakaoka; Yuko Yoshida; Taku Harada; Gota Sudo; Makoto Eizuka; Akira Yorozu; Hiroshi Kitajima; Takeshi Niinuma; Masahiro Kai; Masanori Nojima; Hiromu Suzuki; Hiroshi Nakase
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Host SHP1 phosphatase antagonizes Helicobacter pylori CagA and can be downregulated by Epstein-Barr virus.

Authors:  Priya Saju; Naoko Murata-Kamiya; Takeru Hayashi; Yoshie Senda; Lisa Nagase; Saori Noda; Keisuke Matsusaka; Sayaka Funata; Akiko Kunita; Masayuki Urabe; Yasuyuki Seto; Masashi Fukayama; Atsushi Kaneda; Masanori Hatakeyama
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 17.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.