BACKGROUND: Erythroderma is a severe syndrome and prognostic studies are rare in the literature. OBJECTIVES: Through a retrospective study of erythroderma in adults, we have analysed epidemiological and clinical data and precised the relevant aetiologies and survival in our patients. METHODS: This study was performed at the Department of Dermatology of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis (1995-2007) including 82 cases of acquired erythroderma (>16 years). We have recorded epidemio-clinical, biological and histological data, treatment and outcome. Clinical-histological correlation was analysed [kappa coefficient (kappa)]. Follow-up time and disease-free survival time were calculated as were Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival and relapse-free survival for some aetiologies. RESULTS: Erythroderma represented 0.44 per thousand of all dermatoses with an age of 55.13 +/- 18.16 and no sex predilection. Psoriasis was the predominant aetiology (32.9%) with a median duration of 6.75 years and previous one or more episodes of erythroderma. Psoriasis was significantly associated with pruritus (P = 0.0001), pachyonychia (P = 0.00001), palmoplantar keratoderma (P = 0.0001) and hypereosinophilia (P = 0.008). The latter is then not specific for drug induced erythroderma (P = 0.004). Carbamazepine (27.8%) and penicillin (22.2%) were the most implicated drugs. Positive Clinical-histological correlation was found in 77% of cases (kappa = 0.753). Relapse was seen in all aetiologies, but drug reactions and had occurred in the first 3 years in 90% of them. Mortality rate was 11.3 per 1000 patients-years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study illustrates the severity of erythroderma. It alters heavily the quality of life of patients which is initially altered by the pre-existent dermatosis. It may be life threatening as mortality rate is high.
BACKGROUND:Erythroderma is a severe syndrome and prognostic studies are rare in the literature. OBJECTIVES: Through a retrospective study of erythroderma in adults, we have analysed epidemiological and clinical data and precised the relevant aetiologies and survival in our patients. METHODS: This study was performed at the Department of Dermatology of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis (1995-2007) including 82 cases of acquired erythroderma (>16 years). We have recorded epidemio-clinical, biological and histological data, treatment and outcome. Clinical-histological correlation was analysed [kappa coefficient (kappa)]. Follow-up time and disease-free survival time were calculated as were Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival and relapse-free survival for some aetiologies. RESULTS:Erythroderma represented 0.44 per thousand of all dermatoses with an age of 55.13 +/- 18.16 and no sex predilection. Psoriasis was the predominant aetiology (32.9%) with a median duration of 6.75 years and previous one or more episodes of erythroderma. Psoriasis was significantly associated with pruritus (P = 0.0001), pachyonychia (P = 0.00001), palmoplantar keratoderma (P = 0.0001) and hypereosinophilia (P = 0.008). The latter is then not specific for drug induced erythroderma (P = 0.004). Carbamazepine (27.8%) and penicillin (22.2%) were the most implicated drugs. Positive Clinical-histological correlation was found in 77% of cases (kappa = 0.753). Relapse was seen in all aetiologies, but drug reactions and had occurred in the first 3 years in 90% of them. Mortality rate was 11.3 per 1000 patients-years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study illustrates the severity of erythroderma. It alters heavily the quality of life of patients which is initially altered by the pre-existent dermatosis. It may be life threatening as mortality rate is high.