Literature DB >> 20028253

A new model of bioterrorism risk assessment.

Vladan Radosavljevic1, Goran Belojevic.   

Abstract

There has been an abundance of different bioterrorist attack scenarios and consequently an unclear biodefense strategy so far. We present a framework for bioterrorism risk assessment that we believe would be useful for policymakers and understandable without needing to be an expert in this field. We retrieved the Medline database via PubMed (from January 1987 to January 2009) and cross-referenced and reviewed the terms biological weapons, biological attacks, bioterror, bio(defense), bio(strategy) and epidemiologic models, and risk assessment. Additionally, we conducted an internet search with the same terms and strategy. We divided bioterrorist attacks into 3 categories: strategical (large-scale), operational (middle-scale), and tactical (small-scale). A bioterrorist attack is presented as a 4-component chain model, including perpetrators, agents, means of delivery, and targets. For any of these 4 components, we propose quantitative and qualitative risk assessment parameters. Here we present a simple scoring system within our model applied to the 2001 U.S. anthrax attacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20028253     DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror        ISSN: 1538-7135


  8 in total

1.  Comparative efficacy of two leading candidate ricin toxin a subunit vaccines in mice.

Authors:  Joanne M O'Hara; Robert N Brey; Nicholas J Mantis
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-03-20

2.  Novel Ricin Subunit Antigens With Enhanced Capacity to Elicit Toxin-Neutralizing Antibody Responses in Mice.

Authors:  Newton Wahome; Erin Sully; Christopher Singer; Justin C Thomas; Lei Hu; Sangeeta B Joshi; David B Volkin; Jianwen Fang; John Karanicolas; Donald J Jacobs; Nicholas J Mantis; C Russell Middaugh
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  The need for continued development of ricin countermeasures.

Authors:  Ronald B Reisler; Leonard A Smith
Journal:  Adv Prev Med       Date:  2012-03-26

Review 4.  Biodefence research two decades on: worth the investment?

Authors:  Carrie M Long; Andrea Marzi
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 71.421

Review 5.  The current state of bioterrorist attack surveillance and preparedness in the US.

Authors:  Oliver Grundmann
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-10-09

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of Risk Analysis Tools for Differentiating Unnatural From Natural Epidemics.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Abrar Ahmad Chughtai; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 7.  Disease prediction models and operational readiness.

Authors:  Courtney D Corley; Laura L Pullum; David M Hartley; Corey Benedum; Christine Noonan; Peter M Rabinowitz; Mary J Lancaster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Survey of systems for comparative ranking of agents that pose a bioterroristic threat.

Authors:  A Menrath; K Tomuzia; H Frentzel; J Braeunig; B Appel
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.702

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.