Literature DB >> 20028043

Review of the integrated process for the production of grass biomethane.

Abdul-Sattar Nizami1, Nicholas E Korres, Jerry D Murphy.   

Abstract

Production of grass biomethane is an integrated process which involves numerous stages with numerous permutations. The grass grown can be of numerous species, and it can involve numerous cuts. The lignocellulosic content of grass increases with maturity of grass; the first cut offers more methane potential than the later cuts. Water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) are higher (and as such methane potential is higher) for grass cut in the afternoon as opposed to that cut in the morning. The method of ensiling has a significant effect on the dry solids content of the grass silage. Pit or clamp silage in southern Germany and Austria has a solids content of about 40%; warm dry summers allow wilting of the grass before ensiling. In temperate oceanic climates like Ireland, pit silage has a solids content of about 21% while bale silage has a solids content of 32%. Biogas production is related to mass of volatile solids rather than mass of silage; typically one ton of volatile solid produces 300 m(3) of methane. The dry solids content of the silage has a significant impact on the biodigester configuration. Silage with a high solids content would lend itself to a two-stage process; a leach bed where volatile solids are converted to a leachate high in chemical oxygen demand (COD), followed by an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket where the COD can be converted efficiently to CH(4). Alternative configurations include wet continuous processes such as the ubiquitous continuously stirred tank reactor; this necessitates significant dilution of the feedstock to effect a solids content of 12%. Various pretreatment methods may be employed especially if the hydrolytic step is separated from the methanogenic step. Size reduction, thermal, and enzymatic methodologies are used. Good digester design is to seek to emulate the cow, thus rumen fluid offers great potential for hydrolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20028043     DOI: 10.1021/es901533j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Solid-state anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal waste and sawdust: impact of co-digestion ratio, inoculum-to-substrate ratio, and total solids.

Authors:  Fazel Ziaee; Nader Mokhtarani; Kasra Pourrostami Niavol
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  An integrated approach for efficient biomethane production from solid bio-wastes in a compact system.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Yu Tao; Margarida Temudo; Margot Schooneveld; Henk Bijl; Nanqi Ren; Monika Wolf; Cornelia Heine; Anne Foerster; Vincent Pelenc; Joris Kloek; Jules B van Lier; Merle de Kreuk
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.040

3.  Fungal fermentation on anaerobic digestate for lipid-based biofuel production.

Authors:  Yuan Zhong; Zhiguo Liu; Christine Isaguirre; Yan Liu; Wei Liao
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Impact of process temperature and organic loading rate on cellulolytic / hydrolytic biofilm microbiomes during biomethanation of ryegrass silage revealed by genome-centered metagenomics and metatranscriptomics.

Authors:  Irena Maus; Michael Klocke; Alexander Sczyrba; Andreas Schlüter; Jaqueline Derenkó; Yvonne Stolze; Michael Beckstette; Carsten Jost; Daniel Wibberg; Jochen Blom; Christian Henke; Katharina Willenbücher; Madis Rumming; Antje Rademacher; Alfred Pühler
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2020-03-02

5.  Development and characterization of stable anaerobic thermophilic methanogenic microbiomes fermenting switchgrass at decreasing residence times.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Liang; Jason M Whitham; Evert K Holwerda; Xiongjun Shao; Liang Tian; Yu-Wei Wu; Vincent Lombard; Bernard Henrissat; Dawn M Klingeman; Zamin K Yang; Mircea Podar; Tom L Richard; James G Elkins; Steven D Brown; Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 6.040

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.