AIM: To analyze the performance value of high risk factors in population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in China. METHODS: We compared the performance value of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and other high risk factors questionnaire in a population sample of 13 214 community residents who completed both the iFOBT and questionnaire investigation. Patients with either a positive iFOBT and/or questionnaire were regarded as a high risk population and those eligible were asked to undergo colonoscopy. RESULTS: The iFOBT had the highest positive predictive value and negative predictive value in screening for advanced neoplasia. The iFOBT had the highest sensitivity, lowest number of extra false positive results associated with the detection of one extra abnormality for screening advanced neoplasias and adenomas. A history of chronic cholecystitis or cholecystectomy, chronic appendicitis or appendectomy, and chronic diarrhea also had a higher sensitivity than a history of adenomatous polyps in screening for advanced neoplasias and adenomas. The sensitivity of a history of chronic cholecystitis or cholecystectomy was highest among the 10 high risk factors in screening for non-adenomatous polyps. A history of chronic appendicitis or appendectomy, chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea, mucous and bloody stool, CRC in first degree relatives, malignant tumor and a positive iFOBT also had higher sensitivities than a history of adenomas polyps in screening for non-adenomatous polyps. Except for a history of malignant tumor in screening for non-adenomatous polyps, the gain in sensitivity was associated with an increase in extra false positive results associated with the detection of one extra abnormality. CONCLUSION: The iFOBT may be the best marker for screening for advanced neoplasias and adenomas. Some unique high risk factors may play an important role in CRC screening in China.
AIM: To analyze the performance value of high risk factors in population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in China. METHODS: We compared the performance value of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and other high risk factors questionnaire in a population sample of 13 214 community residents who completed both the iFOBT and questionnaire investigation. Patients with either a positive iFOBT and/or questionnaire were regarded as a high risk population and those eligible were asked to undergo colonoscopy. RESULTS: The iFOBT had the highest positive predictive value and negative predictive value in screening for advanced neoplasia. The iFOBT had the highest sensitivity, lowest number of extra false positive results associated with the detection of one extra abnormality for screening advanced neoplasias and adenomas. A history of chronic cholecystitis or cholecystectomy, chronic appendicitis or appendectomy, and chronic diarrhea also had a higher sensitivity than a history of adenomatous polyps in screening for advanced neoplasias and adenomas. The sensitivity of a history of chronic cholecystitis or cholecystectomy was highest among the 10 high risk factors in screening for non-adenomatous polyps. A history of chronic appendicitis or appendectomy, chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea, mucous and bloody stool, CRC in first degree relatives, malignant tumor and a positive iFOBT also had higher sensitivities than a history of adenomas polyps in screening for non-adenomatous polyps. Except for a history of malignant tumor in screening for non-adenomatous polyps, the gain in sensitivity was associated with an increase in extra false positive results associated with the detection of one extra abnormality. CONCLUSION: The iFOBT may be the best marker for screening for advanced neoplasias and adenomas. Some unique high risk factors may play an important role in CRC screening in China.
Authors: F Loeve; M L Brown; R Boer; M van Ballegooijen; G J van Oortmarssen; J D Habbema Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-04-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Lodewijk A A Brosens; Arnout van Hattem; Linda M Hylind; Christine Iacobuzio-Donahue; Katharine E Romans; Jennifer Axilbund; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Anne C Tersmette; G Johan A Offerhaus; Francis M Giardiello Journal: Gut Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: J J Y Sung; J Y W Lau; G P Young; Y Sano; H M Chiu; J S Byeon; K G Yeoh; K L Goh; J Sollano; R Rerknimitr; T Matsuda; K C Wu; S Ng; S Y Leung; G Makharia; V H Chong; K Y Ho; D Brooks; D A Lieberman; F K L Chan Journal: Gut Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste; Mike E Craanen; Rene W M van der Hulst; Joep F Bartelsman; Dick P Bezemer; Kim R Cappendijk; Gerrit A Meijer; Linde M Morsink; Pleun Snel; Hans A R E Tuynman; Roy L J van Wanrooy; Eric I C Wesdorp; Chris J J Mulder Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-03-07 Impact factor: 5.742