PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of (1)H-MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) of the human brain at 3T with volume selection by a double spin echo sequence for localization with adiabatic refocusing pulses (semi-LASER). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty volunteers in two different institutions were measured twice with the same pulse sequence at an echo time of 30 msec. Magnetic resonance (MR) spectra were analyzed with LCModel with a simulated basis set including an experimentally acquired macromolecular signal profile. For specific regions in the brain mean metabolite levels, within and between subject variance, and the coefficient of variation (CoV) were calculated (for taurine, glutamate, total N-acetylaspartate, total creatine, total choline, myo-inositol + glycine, and glutamate + glutamine). RESULTS: Repeated measurements showed no significant differences with a paired t-test and a high reproducibility (CoV ranging from 3%-30% throughout the selected volume). Mean metabolite levels and CoV obtained in similar regions in the brain did not differ significantly between two contributing institutions. The major source of differences between different measurements was identified to be the between-subject variations in the volunteers. CONCLUSION: We conclude that semi-LASER (1)H-MRSI at 3T is an adequate method to obtain quantitative and reproducible measures of metabolite levels over large parts of the brain, applicable across multiple centers. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of (1)H-MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) of the human brain at 3T with volume selection by a double spin echo sequence for localization with adiabatic refocusing pulses (semi-LASER). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty volunteers in two different institutions were measured twice with the same pulse sequence at an echo time of 30 msec. Magnetic resonance (MR) spectra were analyzed with LCModel with a simulated basis set including an experimentally acquired macromolecular signal profile. For specific regions in the brain mean metabolite levels, within and between subject variance, and the coefficient of variation (CoV) were calculated (for taurine, glutamate, total N-acetylaspartate, total creatine, total choline, myo-inositol + glycine, and glutamate + glutamine). RESULTS: Repeated measurements showed no significant differences with a paired t-test and a high reproducibility (CoV ranging from 3%-30% throughout the selected volume). Mean metabolite levels and CoV obtained in similar regions in the brain did not differ significantly between two contributing institutions. The major source of differences between different measurements was identified to be the between-subject variations in the volunteers. CONCLUSION: We conclude that semi-LASER (1)H-MRSI at 3T is an adequate method to obtain quantitative and reproducible measures of metabolite levels over large parts of the brain, applicable across multiple centers. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Mark Mikkelsen; Peter B Barker; Pallab K Bhattacharyya; Maiken K Brix; Pieter F Buur; Kim M Cecil; Kimberly L Chan; David Y-T Chen; Alexander R Craven; Koen Cuypers; Michael Dacko; Niall W Duncan; Ulrike Dydak; David A Edmondson; Gabriele Ende; Lars Ersland; Fei Gao; Ian Greenhouse; Ashley D Harris; Naying He; Stefanie Heba; Nigel Hoggard; Tun-Wei Hsu; Jacobus F A Jansen; Alayar Kangarlu; Thomas Lange; R Marc Lebel; Yan Li; Chien-Yuan E Lin; Jy-Kang Liou; Jiing-Feng Lirng; Feng Liu; Ruoyun Ma; Celine Maes; Marta Moreno-Ortega; Scott O Murray; Sean Noah; Ralph Noeske; Michael D Noseworthy; Georg Oeltzschner; James J Prisciandaro; Nicolaas A J Puts; Timothy P L Roberts; Markus Sack; Napapon Sailasuta; Muhammad G Saleh; Michael-Paul Schallmo; Nicholas Simard; Stephan P Swinnen; Martin Tegenthoff; Peter Truong; Guangbin Wang; Iain D Wilkinson; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Hongmin Xu; Fuhua Yan; Chencheng Zhang; Vadim Zipunnikov; Helge J Zöllner; Richard A E Edden Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gülin Öz; Dinesh K Deelchand; Jannie P Wijnen; Vladimír Mlynárik; Lijing Xin; Ralf Mekle; Ralph Noeske; Tom W J Scheenen; Ivan Tkáč Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: B L van de Bank; U E Emir; V O Boer; J J A van Asten; M C Maas; J P Wijnen; H E Kan; G Oz; D W J Klomp; T W J Scheenen Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ivan I Kirov; Ilena C George; Nikhil Jayawickrama; James S Babb; Nissa N Perry; Oded Gonen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mohammad Sabati; Sulaiman Sheriff; Meng Gu; Juan Wei; Henry Zhu; Peter B Barker; Daniel M Spielman; Jeffry R Alger; Andrew A Maudsley Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Dinesh K Deelchand; Isaac M Adanyeguh; Uzay E Emir; Tra-My Nguyen; Romain Valabregue; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Fanny Mochel; Gülin Öz Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 4.668