Literature DB >> 20027410

Comparative study of the blinking time between young adult and adult video display terminal users in indoor environment.

Tânia Mara Cunha Schaefer1, Arthur Rubens Cunha Schaefer, Fernando Cesar Abib, Newton Kara José.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the average blinking time in conversation and in Video Display Terminal use of young adults and adults in the presbyopic age group.
METHODS: A transversal analytical study in a readily accessible sample consisting of Volkswagen do Brasil - Curitiba, Paraná employees was performed. The cohort group consisted of 108 subjects divided into two age groups: Group 1, the young adult group (age range 20-39): 77 employees, mean age of 30.09 +/- 5.09; Group 2, the presbyopic adult group, (age range 40-53): 31 employees, mean age of 44.17 +/- 3. Subjects under 18 years of age, with a history of ocular disorders, contact lens wearers and computer non-users were excluded. The subjects had their faces filmed for 10 minutes in conversation and VDT reading. Student's t-test was used and the statistical significance level was 95%.
RESULTS: The average time between blinks in Group 1 for conversation and VDT reading was 5.16 +/- 1.83 and 10.42 +/- 7.78 seconds, respectively; in Group 2. 4,9 +/- 1.49 and 10.46 +/- 5.54 seconds. In both age groups, the time between blinks in VDT reading situations was higher (p<0.0001). There was no statistically meaningful difference for conversation and VDT reading situations when the two studied age groups were compared (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: There was an increase in the blinking time between young adults and the presbyopic group in VDT use situations when compared with reading situations. The difference in the blinking frequency between young adults and the presbyopic group in VDT use and reading situations was not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20027410     DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27492009000500017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol        ISSN: 0004-2749            Impact factor:   0.872


  2 in total

1.  3D Point-of-Intention Determination Using a Multimodal Fusion of Hand Pointing and Eye Gaze for a 3D Display.

Authors:  Suparat Yeamkuan; Kosin Chamnongthai
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Efficacy of blink software in improving the blink rate and dry eye symptoms in visual display terminal users - A single-blinded randomized control trial.

Authors:  D L Ashwini; Ramesh S Ve; Daniela Nosch; Natoya Wilmot
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.