BACKGROUND: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors raise high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but torcetrapib, the first-in-class inhibitor tested in a large outcome trial, caused an unexpected blood pressure elevation and increased cardiovascular events. Whether the hypertensive effect resulted from CETP inhibition or an off-target action of torcetrapib has been debated. We hypothesized that common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CETP gene could help distinguish mechanism-based from off-target actions of CETP inhibitors to inform on the validity of CETP as a therapeutic target. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the effect of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment on lipid fractions, blood pressure, and electrolytes in up to 67 687 individuals from genetic studies and 17 911 from randomized trials. CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment reduced CETP activity and had a directionally concordant effect on 8 lipid and lipoprotein traits (total, low-density lipoprotein, and HDL cholesterol; HDL2; HDL3; apolipoproteins A-I and B; and triglycerides), with the genetic effect on HDL cholesterol (0.13 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 0.14 mmol/L) being consistent with that expected of a 10-mg dose of torcetrapib (0.13 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.15). In trials, 60 mg of torcetrapib elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 4.47 mm Hg (95% CI 4.10 to 4.84 mm Hg) and 2.08 mm Hg (95% CI 1.84 to 2.31 mm Hg), respectively. However, the effect of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms on systolic blood pressure (0.16 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.60 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (-0.04 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.28 mm Hg) was null and significantly different from that expected of 10 mg of torcetrapib. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance in the effects of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment on blood pressure despite the concordant effects on lipids indicates the hypertensive action of torcetrapib is unlikely to be due to CETP inhibition or shared by chemically dissimilar CETP inhibitors. Genetic studies could find a place in drug-development programs as a new source of randomized evidence for drug-target validation in humans.
BACKGROUND: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors raise high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, but torcetrapib, the first-in-class inhibitor tested in a large outcome trial, caused an unexpected blood pressure elevation and increased cardiovascular events. Whether the hypertensive effect resulted from CETP inhibition or an off-target action of torcetrapib has been debated. We hypothesized that common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the CETP gene could help distinguish mechanism-based from off-target actions of CETP inhibitors to inform on the validity of CETP as a therapeutic target. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the effect of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment on lipid fractions, blood pressure, and electrolytes in up to 67 687 individuals from genetic studies and 17 911 from randomized trials. CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment reduced CETP activity and had a directionally concordant effect on 8 lipid and lipoprotein traits (total, low-density lipoprotein, and HDL cholesterol; HDL2; HDL3; apolipoproteins A-I and B; and triglycerides), with the genetic effect on HDL cholesterol (0.13 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11 to 0.14 mmol/L) being consistent with that expected of a 10-mg dose of torcetrapib (0.13 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.15). In trials, 60 mg of torcetrapib elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure by 4.47 mm Hg (95% CI 4.10 to 4.84 mm Hg) and 2.08 mm Hg (95% CI 1.84 to 2.31 mm Hg), respectively. However, the effect of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms on systolic blood pressure (0.16 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.60 mm Hg) and diastolic blood pressure (-0.04 mm Hg, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.28 mm Hg) was null and significantly different from that expected of 10 mg of torcetrapib. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance in the effects of CETP single-nucleotide polymorphisms and torcetrapib treatment on blood pressure despite the concordant effects on lipids indicates the hypertensive action of torcetrapib is unlikely to be due to CETP inhibition or shared by chemically dissimilar CETP inhibitors. Genetic studies could find a place in drug-development programs as a new source of randomized evidence for drug-target validation in humans.
Authors: Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Greetje J de Grooth; Hitoshi Kawamura; Anke H Klerkx; Francois Wilhelm; Mieke D Trip; John J P Kastelein Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-05-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Steven E Nissen; Jean-Claude Tardif; Stephen J Nicholls; James H Revkin; Charles L Shear; William T Duggan; Witold Ruzyllo; William B Bachinsky; Gabriel P Lasala; Gregory P Lasala; E Murat Tuzcu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Philip J Barter; Mark Caulfield; Mats Eriksson; Scott M Grundy; John J P Kastelein; Michel Komajda; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Lori Mosca; Jean-Claude Tardif; David D Waters; Charles L Shear; James H Revkin; Kevin A Buhr; Marian R Fisher; Alan R Tall; Bryan Brewer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Nadeem Sarwar; Sebhat Erqou; Danish Saleheen; Robin P F Dullaart; Bernard Keavney; Zheng Ye; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Guillaume Paré; Alex N Parker; Robert Y L Zee; Joseph P Miletich; Daniel I Chasman Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2009-01-23
Authors: Debbie A Lawlor; Roger M Harbord; Jonathan A C Sterne; Nic Timpson; George Davey Smith Journal: Stat Med Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: David Melzer; John R B Perry; Dena Hernandez; Anna-Maria Corsi; Kara Stevens; Ian Rafferty; Fulvio Lauretani; Anna Murray; J Raphael Gibbs; Giuseppe Paolisso; Sajjad Rafiq; Javier Simon-Sanchez; Hana Lango; Sonja Scholz; Michael N Weedon; Sampath Arepalli; Neil Rice; Nicole Washecka; Alison Hurst; Angela Britton; William Henley; Joyce van de Leemput; Rongling Li; Anne B Newman; Greg Tranah; Tamara Harris; Vijay Panicker; Colin Dayan; Amanda Bennett; Mark I McCarthy; Aimo Ruokonen; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Jack Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew Singleton; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: James P Corsetti; Dan Ryan; David L Rainwater; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; Charles E Sparks Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Philippa J Talmud; Fotios Drenos; Sonia Shah; Tina Shah; Jutta Palmen; Claudio Verzilli; Tom R Gaunt; Jacky Pallas; Ruth Lovering; Kawah Li; Juan Pablo Casas; Reecha Sofat; Meena Kumari; Santiago Rodriguez; Toby Johnson; Stephen J Newhouse; Anna Dominiczak; Nilesh J Samani; Mark Caulfield; Peter Sever; Alice Stanton; Denis C Shields; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Olle Melander; Claire Hastie; Christian Delles; Shah Ebrahim; Michael G Marmot; George Davey Smith; Debbie A Lawlor; Patricia B Munroe; Ian N Day; Mika Kivimaki; John Whittaker; Steve E Humphries; Aroon D Hingorani Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 11.025