BACKGROUND: Both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications increase mortality rate in acute coronary syndromes. Their frequency and relative importance vary according to individual patient risk profiles. We sought to develop prognostic models for the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding to assess their impact on risk of death and to examine the manner in which alternative antithrombotic regimens affect these risks in individual patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial randomized 13 819 patients with acute coronary syndrome to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. By logistic regression, there were 5 independent predictors of MI within 30 days (n=705; 5.1%) and 8 independent predictors of major bleeding (n=645; 4.7%), only 2 of which were common to both event types. In a covariate-adjusted, time-updated Cox regression model, both MI and major bleeding significantly affected subsequent mortality rate (hazard ratios, 2.7 and 2.9, respectively; both P<0.001). Treatment with bivalirudin versus heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was associated with a nonsignificant 8% increase in MI and a highly significant 50% decrease in major bleeding. Given the individual patient risk profiles and the fact that bivalirudin prevented approximately 6 major bleeds for each MI that might occur from its use, the estimated reduction in bleeding was greater than the estimated increase in MI by bivalirudin alone rather than heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor for nearly all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of the individual patient risk profile for MI and major bleeding and the relative treatment effects of alternative pharmacotherapies permits personalized decision making to optimize therapy of patients with acute coronary syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00093158.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications increase mortality rate in acute coronary syndromes. Their frequency and relative importance vary according to individual patient risk profiles. We sought to develop prognostic models for the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding to assess their impact on risk of death and to examine the manner in which alternative antithrombotic regimens affect these risks in individual patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial randomized 13 819 patients with acute coronary syndrome to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. By logistic regression, there were 5 independent predictors of MI within 30 days (n=705; 5.1%) and 8 independent predictors of major bleeding (n=645; 4.7%), only 2 of which were common to both event types. In a covariate-adjusted, time-updated Cox regression model, both MI and major bleeding significantly affected subsequent mortality rate (hazard ratios, 2.7 and 2.9, respectively; both P<0.001). Treatment with bivalirudin versus heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor was associated with a nonsignificant 8% increase in MI and a highly significant 50% decrease in major bleeding. Given the individual patient risk profiles and the fact that bivalirudin prevented approximately 6 major bleeds for each MI that might occur from its use, the estimated reduction in bleeding was greater than the estimated increase in MI by bivalirudin alone rather than heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor for nearly all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Consideration of the individual patient risk profile for MI and major bleeding and the relative treatment effects of alternative pharmacotherapies permits personalized decision making to optimize therapy of patients with acute coronary syndrome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00093158.
Authors: Wyman W Lai; Victoria L Vetter; Marc Richmond; Jennifer S Li; J Philip Saul; Seema Mital; Steven D Colan; Jane W Newburger; Lynn A Sleeper; Brian W McCrindle; L Luann Minich; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Bradley S Marino; Ismee A Williams; Gail D Pearson; Frank Evans; Jane D Scott; Meryl S Cohen Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Wouter J Kikkert; Bimmer E Claessen; Gregg W Stone; Roxana Mehran; Bernhard Witzenbichler; Bruce R Brodie; Jochen Wöhrle; Adam Witkowski; Giulio Guagliumi; Krzysztof Zmudka; José P S Henriques; Jan G P Tijssen; Elias A Sanidas; Vasiliki Chantziara; Ke Xu; George D Dangas Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Marco Valgimigli; Francesco Costa; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Robert M Clare; Lars Wallentin; David J Moliterno; Paul W Armstrong; Harvey D White; Claes Held; Philip E Aylward; Frans Van de Werf; Robert A Harrington; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Pierluigi Tricoci Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Keun-Ho Park; Myung Ho Jeong; Youngkeun Ahn; Sang Sik Jung; Moo Hyun Kim; Hyoung-Mo Yang; Junghan Yoon; Seung Woon Rha; Keum Soo Park; Kyoo Rok Han; Byung Ryul Cho; Kwang Soo Cha; Byung Ok Kim; Min Soo Hyon; Won-Yong Shin; Hyunmin Choe; Jang-Whan Bae; Hee Yeol Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Rachael Boggon; Tjeerd P van Staa; Adam Timmis; Harry Hemingway; Kausik K Ray; Alan Begg; Cathy Emmas; Keith A A Fox Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Peter Damman; Pier Woudstra; Wichert J Kuijt; Robbert J de Winter; Stefan K James Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.300