| Literature DB >> 20026474 |
Tomohisa Hasunuma1, Kazuo Harada, Shin-Ichi Miyazawa, Akihiko Kondo, Eiichiro Fukusaki, Chikahiro Miyake.
Abstract
Understanding of the control of metabolic pathways in plants requires direct measurement of the metabolic turnover rate. Sugar phosphate metabolism, including the Calvin cycle, is the primary pathway in C(3) photosynthesis, the dynamic status of which has not been assessed quantitatively in the leaves of higher plants. Since the flux of photosynthetic carbon metabolism is affected by the CO(2) fixation rate in leaves, a novel in vivo (13)C-labelling system was developed with (13)CO(2) for the kinetic determination of metabolic turnover that was the time-course of the (13)C-labelling ratio in each metabolite. The system is equipped with a gas-exchange chamber that enables real-time monitoring of the CO(2) fixation rate and a freeze-clamp that excises a labelled leaf concurrently with quenching the metabolic reactions by liquid nitrogen within the photosynthesis chamber. Kinetic measurements were performed by detecting mass isotopomer abundance with capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry. The multiple reaction monitoring method was optimized for the determination of each compound for sensitive detection because the amount of some sugar phosphates in plant cells is extremely small. Our analytical system enabled the in vivo turnover of sugar phosphates to be monitored in fresh tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves, which revealed that the turnover rate of glucose-1-phosphate (G1P) was significantly lower than that of other sugar phosphates, including glucose-6-phosphate (G6P). The pool size of G1P is 12 times lower than that of G6P. These results indicate that the conversion of G6P to G1P is one of the rate-limiting steps in the sugar phosphate pathway.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20026474 PMCID: PMC2826653 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.The path of carbon in photosynthesis in a tobacco leaf. Abbreviations: ADP-Glc, adenosine-5′-diphosphate glucose; BPGA, 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate; DHAP, dihydroxyacetonephosphate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; FBP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; G1P, glucose-1-phosphate; G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PGA, 3-phosphoglycerate; R5P, ribose-5-phosphate; RuBP, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; S6P, sucrose-6-phosphate; S7P, sedoheptulose-7-phosphate; SBP, sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate; UDP-Glc, uridine-5′-diphosphate glucose; Xu5P, xylulose-5-phosphate. Numbers in circles denote enzymes as follows: (1) RuBP carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco); (2) GAP dehydrogenase; (3) FBP aldolase; (4) fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase); (5) SBP aldolase; (6) sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase); (7) phosphoribulokinase; (8) phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI); (9) phosphoglucomutase (PGM); (10) ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase; (11) sucrose phosphate synthase.
Method settings for isotopomer monitoring
| Period | Analyte | Q1 ( | Q3 ( | DP (V) | CLE (V) | CXP (V) |
| 1 | None | |||||
| 2 | HP1 | 259.0, 260.0, 261.0, 262.0, 263.0, 264.0, 265.0 | 97.0 | –50 | –22 | –5 |
| PP2 | 228.9, 229.9, 230.9, 231.9, 232.9. 233.9 | 97.1 | –55 | –18 | –5 | |
| Ribitol | 151.0 | 89.0 | –55 | –16 | –3 | |
| PIPES | 301.0 | 193.1 | –85 | –38 | –13 | |
| Total number of MRM: 15 | Scan time: 0.825 s | |||||
| 3 | RuBP | 308.9, 309.9, 310.9, 311.9, 312.9, 313.9 | 97.1 | –45 | –26 | –5 |
| PGA | 184.9, 185.9, 188.9, 187.9 | 97.0 | –40 | –20 | –5 | |
| PEP | 166.9, 167.9, 168.9, 169.9 | 79.1 | –40 | –18 | –1 | |
| Total number of MRM: 14 | Scan time: 0.770 s | |||||
| 1 | None | |||||
| 2 | Ribitol | 151.0 | 89.0 | –55 | –16 | –3 |
| Total number of MRM: 1 | Scan time: 0.060 s | |||||
| 3 | S7P | 289.0, 290.0, 291.0, 292.0, 293.0, 294.0, 295.0, 296.0 | 97.0 | –55 | –30 | –5 |
| TP | 168.9, 169.9, 170.9, 171.9 | 97.0 | –40 | –14 | –5 | |
| PIPES | 301.0 | 193.1 | –85 | –38 | –13 | |
| Total number of MRM: 16 | Scan time: 0.880 seconds | |||||
| 4 | SBP | 368.9, 369.9, 370.9, 371.9, 372.9, 373.9, 374.9, 375.9 | 97.1 | –45 | –30 | –5 |
| FBP | 339.0, 340.0, 341.0, 342.0, 343.0, 344.0, 345.0 | 97.1 | –40 | –30 | –5 | |
| Total number of MRM: 15 | Scan time: 0.825 s | |||||
| 1 | None | |||||
| 2 | Ribitol | 151.0 | 89.0 | –55 | –16 | –3 |
| ADP-Glc | 588.1, 589.1, 590.1, 591.1, 592.1, 593.1, 594.1 | 346.1 | –95 | –34 | –3 | |
| UDP-Glc | 565.1, 566.1, 567.1, 568.1, 569.1, 570.1, 571.1 | 323.1 | –85 | –34 | –1 | |
| PIPES | 301.0 | 193.1 | –85 | –38 | –13 | |
| Total number of MRM: 16 | Scan time: 0.880 s | |||||
Three types of runs of CE-MS/MS were performed per sample. The optimized parameters, Q1 (m/z of deprotonated precursor ion), Q3 (m/z of product ion), DP (declustering potential), CLE (collision energy), and collision cell exit potential (CXP) are listed. Dwell time of each MRM transition was set at 50 ms. PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulphonic acid.
Hexose monophosphate (G6P, F6P, G1P).
Pentose monophosphate (R5P, Ru5P/Xu5P).
c Triose monophosphate (GAP, DHAP).
Fig. 2.Photosynthesis chamber for feeding 13CO2 into a tobacco leaf (A) and flow path of mixed gasses (B). Air is 20% O2 and 80% N2. 1, light guide; 2, PAM probe; 3, gas-exchange chamber; 4, leaf cutter; 5, liquid nitrogen reservoir. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 3.Mass distribution of RuBP at 0 min (A), 1 min (B), and 10 min (C) after initiation of 13C-labelling from 13CO2. Q1, m/z of deprotonated precursor ion; Q3, m/z of product ion.
Fig. 4.Time-course of mass distribution of sugar phosphates in tobacco leaves under 1000 ppm 13CO2 conditions. The mass distribution of ADP-glucose and UDP-glucose was calculated for the glucose moieties. Ru5P was not separated from Xu5P by capillary electrophoresis. Values are the averages of measurements of three different tobacco plants, ±SEM. Closed diamonds (black), m0; open circles (blue), m1; closed triangles (light blue), m2; open squares (green), m3; open diamonds (orange), m4; closed circles (pink), m5; open triangles (purple), m6; closed squares (grey), m7. mi represents the relative isotopomer abundance for each metabolites in which i13C atoms are incorporated. 100% means the isotopomer abundance corresponds to the pool size of the metabolite. (This figure is available in colour at JXB online.)
Fig. 5.Time-course for fraction of C as 13C fraction in tobacco leaves under 200 ppm (circles) and 1000 ppm (filled diamonds) 13CO2 conditions.
Fig. 6.Metabolic turnover rate of metabolites in tobacco leaves under 200 ppm (grey bars) and 1000 ppm (white bars) 13CO2 condition. Values are the averages of measurements of three different tobacco plants, ±SEM.
Comparison of metabolite pools in tobacco leaves
| Metabolite | Concentration (μmol m−2) |
| PGA | 3.5±0.8 |
| DHAP | 10.5±6.6 |
| PEP | 1.0±0.2 |
| FBP | 0.6±0.0 |
| F6P | 16.8±1.1 |
| SBP | 0.1±0.0 |
| S7P | 70.3±3.3 |
| R5P | 4.5±4.3 |
| Ru5P/Xu5P | 14.1±8.1 |
| RuBP | 10.0±1.4 |
| G6P | 31.0±19.0 |
| G1P | 2.5±1.7 |
| ADP-Glc | 0.9±0.2 |
| UDP-Glc | 9.3±2.5 |
The value for Ru5P/Xu5P represents the sum of Ru5P and Xu5P content. Values are averages from measurements of three different tobacco plants, ±SEM. Leaf discs were exposed to an air stream containing 1000 ppm CO2 for 30 min in a gas exchange chamber before sampling.
Ratio of carbon turnover rate to CO2 assimilation rate under different CO2 conditions
| Compound | Rate of decrease in | ||
| PGA | 1.08±0.07 | 0.52±0.01 | 0.48 |
| DHAP | 1.20±0.11 | 0.47±0.02 | 0.39 |
| PEP | 0.76±0.07 | 0.52±0.02 | 0.68 |
| FBP | 0.43±0.07 | 0.21±0.03 | 0.50 |
| F6P | 0.37±0.02 | 0.21±0.02 | 0.55 |
| SBP | 0.42±0.09 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.51 |
| S7P | 0.41±0.01 | 0.27±0.00 | 0.65 |
| R5P | 0.50±0.05 | 0.27±0.04 | 0.55 |
| Ru5P/Xu5P | 0.49±0.04 | 0.26±0.03 | 0.52 |
| RuBP | 0.52±0.01 | 0.34±0.00 | 0.65 |
| G6P | 0.22±0.01 | 0.17±0.04 | 0.77 |
| G1P | 0.14±0.05 | 0.06±0.00 | 0.46 |
| ADP-Glc | 0.37±0.03 | 0.21±0.07 | 0.55 |
| UDP-Glc | 0.09±0.00 | 0.06±0.03 | 0.69 |
Values are averages from measurements of three different tobacco plants, ±SEM.