Literature DB >> 20026472

Toxicity testing in the 21st century: using the new toxicity testing paradigm to create a taxonomy of adverse effects.

Kim Boekelheide1, Sarah N Campion.   

Abstract

Distinguishing adaptive from adverse responses is fundamental to understanding toxicity and to implementing regulatory guidelines that are protective of human health. However, what we consider to be an adverse effect may change over time as the cultural acceptance of risk alters and new knowledge and insight accumulate. The fact that the identification of an adverse effect is subject to change is obvious, necessary, and uncomfortable. In this commentary, a framework for defining adverse effects is proposed for the emerging paradigm of toxicity testing in the 21st century-a paradigm that focuses on human cells, in vitro approaches, toxicity pathways, and high-throughput techniques. The traditional meaning of an adverse effect as a change at the organismal level is not compatible with this new system of toxicity testing. Instead, based on the experience of accident investigators, we propose that a Toxicological Factors Analysis and Classification System will use the database resulting from the high-throughput toxicity testing of the future to develop a Taxonomy of Adverse Effects. Similar to an accident, predisposing "latent failures" identified within categories of the toxicant response database will be associated with the "active failure" of an adverse effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20026472      PMCID: PMC2902917          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  9 in total

Review 1.  Recognition of adverse and nonadverse effects in toxicity studies.

Authors:  Richard W Lewis; Richard Billington; Eric Debryune; Armin Gamer; B Lang; Francis Carpanini
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.902

2.  A plea for painted railings and painted walls of rooms as the source of lead poisoning amongst Queensland children. 1904.

Authors:  J Lockhart Gibson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Dose-dependent transitions in mechanisms of toxicity: case studies.

Authors:  William Slikker; Melvin E Andersen; Matthew S Bogdanffy; James S Bus; Steven D Cohen; Rory B Conolly; Raymond M David; Nancy G Doerrer; David C Dorman; David W Gaylor; Dale Hattis; John M Rogers; R Woodrow Setzer; James A Swenberg; Kendall Wallace
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Modulation of gene expression and DNA adduct formation in HepG2 cells by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with different carcinogenic potencies.

Authors:  Yvonne C M Staal; Marcel H M van Herwijnen; Frederik J van Schooten; Joost H M van Delft
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.

Authors:  David Kirkland; Stefan Pfuhler; David Tweats; Marilyn Aardema; Raffaella Corvi; Firouz Darroudi; Azeddine Elhajouji; Hansruedi Glatt; Paul Hastwell; Makoto Hayashi; Peter Kasper; Stephan Kirchner; Anthony Lynch; Daniel Marzin; Daniela Maurici; Jean-Roc Meunier; Lutz Müller; Gerhard Nohynek; James Parry; Elizabeth Parry; Veronique Thybaud; Ray Tice; Jan van Benthem; Philippe Vanparys; Paul White
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century: bringing the vision to life.

Authors:  Melvin E Andersen; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis.

Authors:  Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Jane Khoury; Kimberly Yolton; Peter Baghurst; David C Bellinger; Richard L Canfield; Kim N Dietrich; Robert Bornschein; Tom Greene; Stephen J Rothenberg; Herbert L Needleman; Lourdes Schnaas; Gail Wasserman; Joseph Graziano; Russell Roberts
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Behavioral toxicology.

Authors:  H L Needleman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Pragmatic challenges for the vision of toxicity testing in the 21st century in a regulatory context: another Ames test? ...or a new edition of "the Red Book"?

Authors:  Bette Meek; John Doull
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.849

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of adverse effects in 21st century toxicology.

Authors:  Douglas A Keller; Daland R Juberg; Natasha Catlin; William H Farland; Frederick G Hess; Douglas C Wolf; Nancy G Doerrer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Adverse outcome pathway development II: best practices.

Authors:  Daniel L Villeneuve; Doug Crump; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Markus Hecker; Thomas H Hutchinson; Carlie A LaLone; Brigitte Landesmann; Teresa Lettieri; Sharon Munn; Malgorzata Nepelska; Mary Ann Ottinger; Lucia Vergauwen; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  FutureTox II: in vitro data and in silico models for predictive toxicology.

Authors:  Thomas B Knudsen; Douglas A Keller; Miriam Sander; Edward W Carney; Nancy G Doerrer; David L Eaton; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; Kenneth L Hastings; Donna L Mendrick; Raymond R Tice; Paul B Watkins; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  FutureTox III: Bridges for Translation.

Authors:  Daland R Juberg; Thomas B Knudsen; Miriam Sander; Nancy B Beck; Elaine M Faustman; Donna L Mendrick; John R Fowle; Thomas Hartung; Raymond R Tice; Emmanuel Lemazurier; Richard A Becker; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; George P Daston; Alison Harrill; Ronald N Hines; Douglas A Keller; John C Lipscomb; David Watson; Tina Bahadori; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Evaluation of multi-well microelectrode arrays for neurotoxicity screening using a chemical training set.

Authors:  Emma R McConnell; Maxine A McClain; James Ross; William R Lefew; Timothy J Shafer
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 6.  The Salmonella mutagenicity assay: the stethoscope of genetic toxicology for the 21st century.

Authors:  Larry D Claxton; Gisela de A Umbuzeiro; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Toxicity testing in the 21 century: defining new risk assessment approaches based on perturbation of intracellular toxicity pathways.

Authors:  Sudin Bhattacharya; Qiang Zhang; Paul L Carmichael; Kim Boekelheide; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Accelerating the development of 21st-century toxicology: outcome of a Human Toxicology Project Consortium workshop.

Authors:  Martin L Stephens; Craig Barrow; Melvin E Andersen; Kim Boekelheide; Paul L Carmichael; Michael P Holsapple; Mark Lafranconi
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  The human toxome project.

Authors:  Mounir Bouhifd; Melvin E Andersen; Christina Baghdikian; Kim Boekelheide; Kevin M Crofton; Albert J Fornace; Andre Kleensang; Henghong Li; Carolina Livi; Alexandra Maertens; Patrick D McMullen; Michael Rosenberg; Russell Thomas; Marguerite Vantangoli; James D Yager; Liang Zhao; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.043

10.  Toxicity testing of pesticides in zebrafish-a systematic review on chemicals and associated toxicological endpoints.

Authors:  Íris Flávia Sousa Gonçalves; Terezinha Maria Souza; Leonardo Rogério Vieira; Filipi Calbaizer Marchi; Adailton Pascoal Nascimento; Davi Felipe Farias
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.