Literature DB >> 20026133

A Concealed Information Test with multimodal measurement.

Wolfgang Ambach1, Stephanie Bursch, Rudolf Stark, Dieter Vaitl.   

Abstract

A Concealed Information Test (CIT) investigates differential physiological responses to deed-related (probe) vs. irrelevant items. The present study focused on the detection of concealed information using simultaneous recordings of autonomic and brain electrical measures. As a secondary issue, verbal and pictorial presentations were compared with respect to their influence on the recorded measures. Thirty-one participants underwent a mock-crime scenario with a combined verbal and pictorial presentation of nine items. The subsequent CIT, designed with respect to event-related potential (ERP) measurement, used a 3-3.5s interstimulus interval. The item presentation modality, i.e. pictures or written words, was varied between subjects; no response was required from the participants. In addition to electroencephalogram (EEG), electrodermal activity (EDA), electrocardiogram (ECG), respiratory activity, and finger plethysmogram were recorded. A significant probe-vs.-irrelevant effect was found for each of the measures. Compared to sole ERP measurement, the combination of ERP and EDA yielded incremental information for detecting concealed information. Although, EDA per se did not reach the predictive value known from studies primarily designed for peripheral physiological measurement. Presentation modality neither influenced the detection accuracy for autonomic measures nor EEG measures; this underpins the equivalence of verbal and pictorial item presentation in a CIT, regardless of the physiological measures recorded. Future studies should further clarify whether the incremental validity observed in the present study reflects a differential sensitivity of ERP and EDA to different sub-processes in a CIT. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20026133     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  8 in total

1.  A new approach for concealed information identification based on ERP assessment.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Chongxun Zheng; Chunlin Zhao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  P300 amplitudes in the concealed information test are less affected by depth of processing than electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Face and voice as social stimuli enhance differential physiological responding in a concealed information test.

Authors:  Wolfgang Ambach; Birthe Assmann; Bennet Krieg; Dieter Vaitl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-19

4.  Detecting deception via eyeblink frequency modulation.

Authors:  Brandon S Perelman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  A novel algorithm to enhance P300 in single trials: application to lie detection using F-score and SVM.

Authors:  Junfeng Gao; Hongjun Tian; Yong Yang; Xiaolin Yu; Chenhong Li; Nini Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Disrupting dorsolateral prefrontal cortex by rTMS reduces the P300 based marker of deception.

Authors:  Inga Karton; Talis Bachmann
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Does concealing familiarity evoke other processes than concealing untrustworthiness? - Different forms of concealed information modulate P3 effects.

Authors:  René Koeckritz; André Beauducel; Johanna Hundhausen; Anika Redolfi; Anja Leue
Journal:  Personal Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-23

8.  Evaluative Observation in a Concealed Information Test.

Authors:  Wolfgang Ambach; Birthe Assmann; Blanda Wielandt; Dieter Vaitl
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.