Yichayaou Beloosesky1, Avraham Weiss, Maya Manasian, Moshe Salai. 1. Department of Geriatrics Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petach Tikvah, Israel. beloy@clalit.org.il
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between handgrip strength (HG) and upper limb functioning of hip fracture operated elderly patients and their functional outcome 6 months post-op. METHODS: Retrospectively, data on 105 post-operative hip fracture patients was analyzed. Functional level was measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and HG by hand dynamometer, 7-10 days, 1, 3 and 6 months post-op. FIM1 up-to FIM4 (FIM1-FIM4) and HG1 up-to HG4 (HG1-HG4) were determined. Pre-fracture upper limb function was evaluated using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. The Mini-Mental-State Examination evaluated cognition. RESULTS: FIM1-FIM4 scores increased during the 6-month follow-up; HG1-HG4 scores remained unchanged. No differences were found in FIM1-FIM4 and DASH scores between genders. HG1-HG4 scores were significantly higher in men (p = 0.04-0.005). FIM1-FIM4, HG1-HG4 and DASH scores were higher in the cognitively normal patients (p < 0.001). A fair correlation was found between all HG and FIM scores (R = 0.36-0.71, p < 0.001), and between DASH and FIM scores (R = 0.5-0.7, p < 0.001). Log HG1 and FIM4 scores were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.54, p < 0.001). Regression analysis found that only, and in the following order were Log HG1, FIM1, DASH and age significant factors affect FIM4 score (R(2) = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: HG and FIM scores, a week post-op., combined with upper limb functioning and age, can have a 69% prediction accuracy for motor functioning 6 months post-fracture. HG measurement, a week post-hip fracture repair, might be considered in estimating functional motor outcome, and eventually additional interventions should be employed to increase muscle strength and, thus, improve functional outcome.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between handgrip strength (HG) and upper limb functioning of hip fracture operated elderly patients and their functional outcome 6 months post-op. METHODS: Retrospectively, data on 105 post-operative hip fracturepatients was analyzed. Functional level was measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and HG by hand dynamometer, 7-10 days, 1, 3 and 6 months post-op. FIM1 up-to FIM4 (FIM1-FIM4) and HG1 up-to HG4 (HG1-HG4) were determined. Pre-fracture upper limb function was evaluated using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. The Mini-Mental-State Examination evaluated cognition. RESULTS:FIM1-FIM4 scores increased during the 6-month follow-up; HG1-HG4 scores remained unchanged. No differences were found in FIM1-FIM4 and DASH scores between genders. HG1-HG4 scores were significantly higher in men (p = 0.04-0.005). FIM1-FIM4, HG1-HG4 and DASH scores were higher in the cognitively normal patients (p < 0.001). A fair correlation was found between all HG and FIM scores (R = 0.36-0.71, p < 0.001), and between DASH and FIM scores (R = 0.5-0.7, p < 0.001). Log HG1 and FIM4 scores were highly correlated (R(2) = 0.54, p < 0.001). Regression analysis found that only, and in the following order were Log HG1, FIM1, DASH and age significant factors affect FIM4 score (R(2) = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: HG and FIM scores, a week post-op., combined with upper limb functioning and age, can have a 69% prediction accuracy for motor functioning 6 months post-fracture. HG measurement, a week post-hip fracture repair, might be considered in estimating functional motor outcome, and eventually additional interventions should be employed to increase muscle strength and, thus, improve functional outcome.
Authors: Jennifer M T A Meessen; Marta Fiocco; Rutger L Tordoir; Arnout Sjer; Suzan H M Verdegaal; P Eline Slagboom; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Rob G H H Nelissen Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Stephen B Kritchevsky; Daniel E Forman; Kathryn E Callahan; E Wesley Ely; Kevin P High; Frances McFarland; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Kenneth E Schmader; Stephanie A Studenski; John Williams; Susan Zieman; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L Reider; W Hawkes; J R Hebel; C D'Adamo; J Magaziner; R Miller; D Orwig; D E Alley Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Laura Zdziarski-Horodyski; Terrie Vasilopoulos; MaryBeth Horodyski; Jennifer E Hagen; Kalia S Sadasivan; Sharareh Sharififar; Matthew Patrick; Robert Guenther; Heather K Vincent Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Iain K Moppett; Paul L Greenhaff; Ben J Ollivere; Theophillus Joachim; Dileep N Lobo; Martin Rowlands Journal: Trials Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Marco Di Monaco; Carlotta Castiglioni; Elena De Toma; Luisa Gardin; Silvia Giordano; Rosa Tappero Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Laura Zdziarski-Horodyski; MaryBeth Horodyski; Kalia K Sadasivan; Jennifer Hagen; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Matthew Patrick; Robert Guenther; Heather K Vincent Journal: Trials Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 2.279