Literature DB >> 20024742

Discussion and revision of the mathematical modeling tool described in the previously published article "Modeling HIV Transmission risk among Mozambicans prior to their initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy".

Susan Cassels1, Cynthia R Pearson, Ann E Kurth, Diane P Martin, Jane M Simoni, Eduardo Matediana, Stephen Gloyd.   

Abstract

Mathematical models are increasingly used in social and behavioral studies of HIV transmission; however, model structures must be chosen carefully to best answer the question at hand and conclusions must be interpreted cautiously. In Pearson et al. (2007), we presented a simple analytically tractable deterministic model to estimate the number of secondary HIV infections stemming from a population of HIV-positive Mozambicans and to evaluate how the estimate would change under different treatment and behavioral scenarios. In a subsequent application of the model with a different data set, we observed that the model produced an unduly conservative estimate of the number of new HIV-1 infections. In this brief report, our first aim is to describe a revision of the model to correct for this underestimation. Specifically, we recommend adjusting the population-level sexually transmitted infection (STI) parameters to be applicable to the individual-level model specification by accounting for the proportion of individuals uninfected with an STI. In applying the revised model to the original data, we noted an estimated 40 infections/1000 HIV-positive persons per year (versus the original 23 infections/1000 HIV-positive persons per year). In addition, the revised model estimated that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) along with syphilis and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) treatments combined could reduce HIV-1 transmission by 72% (versus 86% according to the original model). The second aim of this report is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of mathematical models in the field and the implications of model interpretation. We caution that simple models should be used for heuristic purposes only. Since these models do not account for heterogeneity in the population and significantly simplify HIV transmission dynamics, they should be used to describe general characteristics of the epidemic and demonstrate the importance or sensitivity of parameters in the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024742      PMCID: PMC3356579          DOI: 10.1080/09540120802626204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Care        ISSN: 0954-0121


  33 in total

1.  Modelling the effect of combination antiretroviral treatments on HIV incidence.

Authors:  M G Law; G Prestage; A Grulich; P Van de Ven; S Kippax
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Mathematical models for HIV transmission dynamics: tools for social and behavioral science research.

Authors:  Susan Cassels; Samuel J Clark; Martina Morris
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Risk of HIV transmission in discordant couples.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Garnett; Brian Gazzard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in herpes simplex virus type 2-seropositive persons: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Wald; Katherine Link
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Ecological and individual level analysis of risk factors for HIV infection in four urban populations in sub-Saharan Africa with different levels of HIV infection.

Authors:  B Auvert; A Buvé; B Ferry; M Caraël; L Morison; E Lagarde; N J Robinson; M Kahindo; J Chege; N Rutenberg; R Musonda; M Laourou; E Akam
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Rates of HIV-1 transmission per coital act, by stage of HIV-1 infection, in Rakai, Uganda.

Authors:  Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray; Nelson K Sewankambo; David Serwadda; Xianbin Li; Oliver Laeyendecker; Noah Kiwanuka; Godfrey Kigozi; Mohammed Kiddugavu; Thomas Lutalo; Fred Nalugoda; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Mary P Meehan; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert C Bailey; Stephen Moses; Corette B Parker; Kawango Agot; Ian Maclean; John N Krieger; Carolyn F M Williams; Richard T Campbell; Jeckoniah O Ndinya-Achola
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Potential effect of HIV type 1 antiretroviral and herpes simplex virus type 2 antiviral therapy on transmission and acquisition of HIV type 1 infection.

Authors:  Connie L Celum; Noah J Robinson; Myron S Cohen
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Esther E Freeman; Helen A Weiss; Judith R Glynn; Pamela L Cross; James A Whitworth; Richard J Hayes
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2006-01-02       Impact factor: 4.177

10.  The epidemiological impact of antiretroviral use predicted by mathematical models: a review.

Authors:  Rebecca F Baggaley; Neil M Ferguson; Geoff P Garnett
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2005-09-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.