Literature DB >> 20024079

High-confidence mapping of chemical compounds and protein complexes reveals novel aspects of chemical stress response in yeast.

Thiago M Venancio1, S Balaji, L Aravind.   

Abstract

Chemical genetics in yeast has shown great potential for clarifying the pharmacology of various drugs. Investigating these results from a systems perspective has uncovered many facets of natural chemical tolerance, but many cellular interactions of chemicals still remain poorly understood. To uncover previously overlooked players in resistance to chemical stress we integrated several independent chemical genetics datasets with protein-protein interactions and a comprehensive collection of yeast protein complexes. As a consequence we were able to identify the potential targets and mode of action of certain poorly understood compounds. However, most complexes recovered in our analysis appear to perform indirect roles in countering deleterious effects of chemicals by constituting an underlying intricate buffering system that has been so far under-appreciated. This buffering role appears to be largely contributed to by complexes pertaining to chromatin and vesicular dynamics. The former set of complexes seems to act by setting up or maintaining gene expression states necessary to protect the cell against chemical effects. Among the latter complexes we found an important role for specific vesicle tethering complexes in tolerating particular sets of compounds, indicating that different chemicals might be routed via different points in the intracellular trafficking system. We also suggest a general operational similarity between these complexes and molecular capacitors (e.g. the chaperone Hsp90). Both have a key role in increasing the system's robustness, although at different levels, through buffering stress and mutation, respectively. It is therefore conceivable that some of these complexes identified here might have roles in molding the evolution of chemical resistance and response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20024079      PMCID: PMC3248796          DOI: 10.1039/b911821g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  40 in total

1.  Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways.

Authors:  Ainslie B Parsons; Renée L Brost; Huiming Ding; Zhijian Li; Chaoying Zhang; Bilal Sheikh; Grant W Brown; Patricia M Kane; Timothy R Hughes; Charles Boone
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast.

Authors:  Guri Giaever; Patrick Flaherty; Jochen Kumm; Michael Proctor; Corey Nislow; Daniel F Jaramillo; Angela M Chu; Michael I Jordan; Adam P Arkin; Ronald W Davis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks.

Authors:  Aviv Bergman; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Identifying functional modules in the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shuye Pu; Jim Vlasblom; Andrew Emili; Jack Greenblatt; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  The CORVET tethering complex interacts with the yeast Rab5 homolog Vps21 and is involved in endo-lysosomal biogenesis.

Authors:  Karolina Peplowska; Daniel F Markgraf; Clemens W Ostrowicz; Gert Bange; Christian Ungermann
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  The novel SLIK histone acetyltransferase complex functions in the yeast retrograde response pathway.

Authors:  Marilyn G Pray-Grant; David Schieltz; Stacey J McMahon; Jennifer M Wood; Erin L Kennedy; Richard G Cook; Jerry L Workman; John R Yates; Patrick A Grant
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Genome-wide screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify genes required for antibiotic insusceptibility of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Alexandra S Blackburn; Simon V Avery
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Discovering modes of action for therapeutic compounds using a genome-wide screen of yeast heterozygotes.

Authors:  Pek Yee Lum; Christopher D Armour; Sergey B Stepaniants; Guy Cavet; Maria K Wolf; J Scott Butler; Jerald C Hinshaw; Philippe Garnier; Glenn D Prestwich; Amy Leonardson; Philip Garrett-Engele; Christopher M Rush; Martin Bard; Greg Schimmack; John W Phillips; Christopher J Roberts; Daniel D Shoemaker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2008 update.

Authors:  Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Chris Stark; Teresa Reguly; Lorrie Boucher; Ashton Breitkreutz; Michael Livstone; Rose Oughtred; Daniel H Lackner; Jürg Bähler; Valerie Wood; Kara Dolinski; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  A genomewide screen for tolerance to cationic drugs reveals genes important for potassium homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lina Barreto; David Canadell; Silvia Petrezsélyová; Clara Navarrete; Lydie Maresová; Jorge Peréz-Valle; Rito Herrera; Iván Olier; Jesús Giraldo; Hana Sychrová; Lynne Yenush; José Ramos; Joaquín Ariño
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 2.  It's the machine that matters: Predicting gene function and phenotype from protein networks.

Authors:  Peggy I Wang; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Ter-dependent stress response systems: novel pathways related to metal sensing, production of a nucleoside-like metabolite, and DNA-processing.

Authors:  Vivek Anantharaman; Lakshminarayan M Iyer; L Aravind
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2012-10-30

Review 4.  Functional toxicogenomics: mechanism-centered toxicology.

Authors:  Matthew North; Chris D Vulpe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Evolutionary and Biochemical Aspects of Chemical Stress Resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Thiago Motta Venancio; Daniel Bellieny-Rabelo; L Aravind
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Histone variant HTZ1 shows extensive epistasis with, but does not increase robustness to, new mutations.

Authors:  Joshua B Richardson; Locke D Uppendahl; Maria K Traficante; Sasha F Levy; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 7.  Functional toxicology: tools to advance the future of toxicity testing.

Authors:  Brandon D Gaytán; Chris D Vulpe
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  A Chemogenomic Screen Reveals Novel Snf1p/AMPK Independent Regulators of Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase.

Authors:  Bruno L Bozaquel-Morais; Juliana B Madeira; Thiago M Venâncio; Thiago Pacheco-Rosa; Claudio A Masuda; Monica Montero-Lomeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  CYSTM, a novel cysteine-rich transmembrane module with a role in stress tolerance across eukaryotes.

Authors:  Thiago M Venancio; L Aravind
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 10.  Chemical genetics: budding yeast as a platform for drug discovery and mapping of genetic pathways.

Authors:  Jorrit M Enserink
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.