Literature DB >> 20023802

From the cellular perspective: exploring differences in the cellular baseline in macroscale and microfluidic cultures.

Amy L Paguirigan1, David J Beebe.   

Abstract

Microfluidic devices for cell culture based assays provide new types of engineered microenvironments and new methods for controlling and quantifying cellular responses to these microenvironments. However, without an understanding of the effects of the microenvironments present in microdevices from a cellular perspective, it will be challenging to integrate work done in microdevices with biological data obtained via traditional methods. With the adaptation and validation of In Cell Westerns (ICWs) and in situ analysis techniques to microfluidic devices, we can begin to look at a variety of cellular responses to microcultures. Here we observe several differences in proliferation, glucose metabolism, signaling pathway activation and protein expression levels between cells cultured in traditional macroscale cultures and in microfluidic cultures. The issues of glucose starvation, growth factor restriction, volume density and effects of interactions with poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) were examined to determine the relative importance of each to cell behavior. Changes in glucose metabolism, insensitivity to volume density or media supplementation, and finally reduced proliferation as the exposure to PDMS increased, suggests that perhaps interactions between media/cells and this commonly employed polymer may be significant for some cell based assays. The differences between cells in macroscale and microfluidic cultures suggest that the cellular baseline may be substantially altered in microcultures due to both inherent differences in scale as well as material differences. The observations highlight the need to biologically validate micofluidic devices for cell based assays in order to accurately interpret the data obtained with them in the context of traditional macroculture data. Additional areas of study that will further characterize and validate microscale culture are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20023802      PMCID: PMC3095018          DOI: 10.1039/b814565b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  40 in total

Review 1.  AMP-activated protein kinase in metabolic control and insulin signaling.

Authors:  Mhairi C Towler; D Grahame Hardie
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  Analysis of single mammalian cells on-chip.

Authors:  Christopher E Sims; Nancy L Allbritton
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  Biomolecular gradients in cell culture systems.

Authors:  Thomas M Keenan; Albert Folch
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Understanding microchannel culture: parameters involved in soluble factor signaling.

Authors:  Hongmei Yu; Caroline M Alexander; David J Beebe
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  A practical guide to microfluidic perfusion culture of adherent mammalian cells.

Authors:  Lily Kim; Yi-Chin Toh; Joel Voldman; Hanry Yu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 6.  The protective and destructive roles played by molecular chaperones during ERAD (endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation).

Authors:  Jeffrey L Brodsky
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 7.  Managing evaporation for more robust microscale assays. Part 2. Characterization of convection and diffusion for cell biology.

Authors:  Erwin Berthier; Jay Warrick; Hongmeiy Yu; David J Beebe
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 8.  Managing evaporation for more robust microscale assays. Part 1. Volume loss in high throughput assays.

Authors:  Erwin Berthier; Jay Warrick; Hongmeiy Yu; David J Beebe
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.799

9.  Microfluidic devices for high-throughput gene expression profiling of single hESC-derived neural stem cells.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Jiang F Zhong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

10.  Automated cell culture in high density tubeless microfluidic device arrays.

Authors:  Ivar Meyvantsson; Jay W Warrick; Steven Hayes; Allyson Skoien; David J Beebe
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 6.799

View more
  49 in total

1.  Expanding the available assays: adapting and validating In-Cell Westerns in microfluidic devices for cell-based assays.

Authors:  Amy L Paguirigan; John P Puccinelli; Xiaojing Su; David J Beebe
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 2.  Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments.

Authors:  Edmond W K Young; David J Beebe
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 3.  Microfluidic devices for cell cultivation and proliferation.

Authors:  Masoomeh Tehranirokh; Abbas Z Kouzani; Paul S Francis; Jagat R Kanwar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  New tools and new biology: recent miniaturized systems for molecular and cellular biology.

Authors:  Morgan Hamon; Jong Wook Hong
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.034

5.  In Vitro Microscale Models for Embryogenesis.

Authors:  Jennifer Rico-Varela; Dominic Ho; Leo Q Wan
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2018-05-07

6.  High-throughput analysis of single hematopoietic stem cell proliferation in microfluidic cell culture arrays.

Authors:  Véronique Lecault; Michael Vaninsberghe; Sanja Sekulovic; David J H F Knapp; Stefan Wohrer; William Bowden; Francis Viel; Thomas McLaughlin; Asefeh Jarandehei; Michelle Miller; Didier Falconnet; Adam K White; David G Kent; Michael R Copley; Fariborz Taghipour; Connie J Eaves; R Keith Humphries; James M Piret; Carl L Hansen
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Biological characterization of the modified poly(dimethylsiloxane) surfaces based on cell attachment and toxicity assays.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jastrzebska; Agnieszka Zuchowska; Sylwia Flis; Patrycja Sokolowska; Magdalena Bulka; Artur Dybko; Zbigniew Brzozka
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Effect of microculture on cell metabolism and biochemistry: do cells get stressed in microchannels?

Authors:  Xiaojing Su; Ashleigh B Theberge; Craig T January; David J Beebe
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Cellular observations enabled by microculture: paracrine signaling and population demographics.

Authors:  Maribella Domenech; Hongmei Yu; Jay Warrick; Nisha M Badders; Ivar Meyvantsson; Caroline M Alexander; David J Beebe
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 10.  Biological implications of polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic cell culture.

Authors:  Keil J Regehr; Maribella Domenech; Justin T Koepsel; Kristopher C Carver; Stephanie J Ellison-Zelski; William L Murphy; Linda A Schuler; Elaine T Alarid; David J Beebe
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 6.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.