Literature DB >> 20023564

Role conflict, role ambiguity, and job satisfaction in nurse executives.

Theresa Tarrant1, Carolyn E Sabo.   

Abstract

This article reports the results of a cross-sectional correlational survey design of nurse executives' (NEs') views on role conflict, role ambiguity, job satisfaction, and depression. A total of 380 surveys were returned from 1000 randomly selected participants. Four instruments were utilized, 1 for demographic data and 3 established instruments. Results indicated that the respondents had low to moderate amounts of role ambiguity, high levels of job satisfaction, low levels of depression, a negative relationship between role conflict and role ambiguity and job satisfaction, and a positive relationship between role conflict and depression. Furthermore, although levels of role conflict are decreasing, levels of role ambiguity are increasing. Neither educational level nor age was related to the dependent variables. Role conflict and role ambiguity are both forms of role stress. This study indicates that stress levels are not overwhelming to the NE and may be encouraging development of required skills. Healthcare organizations will continue to evolve and increase in complexity putting pressure on NEs in their many roles. Although this study did not consider strategies for coping with stress, this important avenue needs to be considered as NEs move forward with more extensive roles in the leadership of our healthcare system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20023564     DOI: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3181c95eb5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Adm Q        ISSN: 0363-9568


  8 in total

1.  Unveiling the Effects of Stressors on Task Performance: The Role of Thriving at Work and Resilience.

Authors:  Zahid Hussain; Hasan Farid; Xinran Liu; Wasim Abbass Shaheen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-30

2.  National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Facilitating Work-Life Balance in Athletic Training Practice Settings.

Authors:  Stephanie M Mazerolle; William A Pitney; Ashley Goodman; Christianne M Eason; Scott Spak; Kent C Scriber; Craig A Voll; Kimberly Detwiler; John Rock; Larry Cooper; Erica Simone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Web-based computer adaptive assessment of individual perceptions of job satisfaction for hospital workplace employees.

Authors:  Tsair-Wei Chien; Wen-Pin Lai; Chih-Wei Lu; Weng-Chung Wang; Shih-Chung Chen; Hsien-Yi Wang; Shih-Bin Su
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Identifying Best Implementation Practices for Smoking Cessation in Complex Cancer Settings.

Authors:  Eleni Giannopoulos; Janet Papadakos; Erin Cameron; Janette Brual; Rebecca Truscott; William K Evans; Meredith Elana Giuliani
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Personality and occupational correlates of anxiety and depression in nurses: the contribution of role conflict, core self-evaluations, negative affect and bullying.

Authors:  Zahra Hosseini; Atefeh Homayuni
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-09-10

6.  Family involvement on nursing wards and the role conflicts experienced by surgical nurses: A multicentre cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marte A A Smits; Edwin J Boezeman; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Angela G E M de Boer; Els J M Nieveen van Dijkum; Anne M Eskes
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2021-09-10

7.  Relationship between role stressors, job tasks and job satisfaction among health surveillance assistants in Malawi: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Simon Ntopi; Ellen Chirwa; Alfred Maluwa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Role ambiguity as an amplifier of the association between job stressors and workers' psychological ill-being: Evidence from an occupational survey in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Oshio; Akiomi Inoue; Akizumi Tsutsumi
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.708

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.