Literature DB >> 20023361

Determination of spondylolisthesis in low back pain by clinical evaluation.

Banu Kalpakcioglu1, Turgay Altinbilek, Kazim Senel.   

Abstract

AIM: Current guides recommend to evaluate the patients with low back pain complaints with initial clinical assessment and history, and to utilize radiological or other imaging technics, in case of possible diagnosis. The aim of this study was to compare the findings of radiological and clinical assessment, and validate the reliability of spondylolisthesis diagnosed with clinical assessment. This study is conducted on 100 patients with, and 30 patients without (control group) radiological diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, who had applied to Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Haydarpasa Numune Hospital with low back pain complaints in one and a half year. Clinic assessment was consisted of 20 parameters including examinations of motor system such as, sign of slipping observed on palpation and inspection, extension of trunk and increase in lumbar lordosis. Antero-posterior, lateral, oblique and lateral flexion/extension radiographies were used for radiological assessment. Slipping degree and lumbar lordosis angle were measured.
RESULTS: Women/men patients ratio was 91/9 in spondylolisthesis group and 22/8 in control group. Age of 69% of patients were 50 and over. In both groups, sciatalgia was observed in more than half of the patients, and no significant difference was detected in localization (p > 0.05). In clinical assessment, weak and drooping abdominal wall, paravertebral muscle hypertrophy, increase in lumbar lordosis, sign of slipping observed on palpation and inspection, hamstring muscle spasm, pain during lateral trunk flexion-extension tasks and during double leg raising task were found to be positively correlated with radiological assesment (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: In our study, a systematic clinical assessment was proved to be useful in determination of possible spondylolisthesis cases. Radiological assessments are required in order to make the diagnosis clear and to determine the grade and prognosis of spondylolisthesis. Advanced imaging techniques like MRI and CT have to be used when neurological symptoms are present, and when surgical intervention is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20023361     DOI: 10.3233/BMR-2009-0212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-8127            Impact factor:   1.398


  6 in total

1.  Clinical presentation and physiotherapy treatment of 4 patients with low back pain and isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Silvano Ferrari; Carla Vanti; Caroline O'Reilly
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2012-06

Review 2.  Assessment and rehabilitation of chronic low back pain in baseball: part II.

Authors:  Joseph G Wasser; Jason L Zaremski; Daniel C Herman; Heather K Vincent
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.674

3.  New physical examination tests for lumbar spondylolisthesis and instability: low midline sill sign and interspinous gap change during lumbar flexion-extension motion.

Authors:  Kang Ahn; Hyung-Joon Jhun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews.

Authors:  Tom Petersen; Mark Laslett; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Effects of diaphragm breathing exercise and feedback breathing exercise on pulmonary function in healthy adults.

Authors:  Min-Sik Yong; Hae-Yong Lee; Yun-Seob Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-01-30

6.  Association of MRI-defined lumbar paraspinal muscle mass and slip percentage in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Park; Koh-Woon Kim; Yousuk Youn; Hyungsuk Kim; Won-Seok Chung; Mi-Yeon Song; Jae-Heung Cho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.