Literature DB >> 20023325

An anatomically shaped lower body model for CT scanning of cadaver femurs.

Esther Tanck1, J C W Deenen, Henk Jan Huisman, Jan G Kooloos, Henk Huizenga, Nico Verdonschot.   

Abstract

Bone specific, CT-based finite element (FE) analyses have great potential to accurately predict the fracture risk of deteriorated bones. However, it has been shown that differences exist between FE-models of femora scanned in a water basin or scanned in situ within the human body, as caused by differences in measured bone mineral densities (BMD). In this study we hypothesized that these differences can be reduced by re-creating the patient CT-conditions by using an anatomically shaped physical model of the lower body. BMD distributions were obtained from four different femora that were scanned under three conditions: (1) in situ within the cadaver body, (2) in a water basin and (3) in the body model. The BMD of the three scanning protocols were compared at two locations: proximally, in the trabecular bone of the femoral head, and in the cortical bone of the femoral shaft. Proximally, no significant differences in BMD were found between the in situ scans and the scans in the body model, whereas the densities from the water basin scans were on average 10.8% lower than in situ. In the femoral shaft the differences between the three scanning protocols were insignificant. In conclusion, the body model better approached the in situ situation than a water basin. Future studies can use this body model to mimic patient situations and to develop protocols to improve the performance of the FE-models in actual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20023325     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  2 in total

1.  In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Alexander Cong; Jorn Op Den Buijs; Dan Dragomir-Daescu
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Effect of different CT scanners and settings on femoral failure loads calculated by finite element models.

Authors:  Florieke Eggermont; Loes C Derikx; Jeffrey Free; Ruud van Leeuwen; Yvette M van der Linden; Nico Verdonschot; Esther Tanck
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.494

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.