Literature DB >> 20023140

Protein digestibility evaluations of meat and fish substrates using laboratory, avian, and ileally cannulated dog assays.

T A Faber1, P J Bechtel, D C Hernot, C M Parsons, K S Swanson, S Smiley, G C Fahey.   

Abstract

Meat and fish serve as important protein sources in the companion animal diet; however, limited protein digestibility data are available for assessing protein digestibility differences among good-quality protein sources. Beef loin, pork loin, chicken breast, pollock fillet, and salmon fillet were evaluated for composition, protein digestibility, and AA bioavailability using the immobilized digestive enzyme assay, cecectomized rooster assay, and ileally cannulated dog assay. Pollock contained the greatest amount of CP, total essential AA (TEAA), and total nonessential AA (TNEAA; DM basis; 96.9, 38.6, and 50.3%, respectively). Salmon contained the next greatest amounts (92.8, 36.4, and 44.6%), followed by chicken (90.3, 36.1, 43.2%). Beef had the least CP content (82.7%), but had slightly greater TEAA and TNEAA concentrations (33.9, 42.0%) compared with pork (86.2, 33.6, 41.3%). Immobilized digestive enzyme assay values were greatest for pollock fillet (0.71) and least for chicken breast (0.52). Beef loin, pork loin, and salmon fillet were similar (0.63, 0.62, and 0.64, respectively). Standardized TEAA and TNEAA digestibility coefficients, evaluated using the cecectomized rooster assay, were greatest (P < 0.05) for pollock fillet (90.4 and 89.8%, respectively) and least (P < 0.05) for chicken breast (86.6 and 85.9%, respectively) and salmon fillet (87.8 and 86.4%, respectively). Dogs assigned to a 5 x 5 Latin square design were fed 5 diets, with each test substrate as the major protein source. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found in ileal digestibility of protein. Values ranged from 88.9% for chicken to 90.5% for pork loin and pollock fillet. Ileal TEAA and TNEAA coefficients were not different among test substrates, with values between 91.7 and 92.7%, and 88.8 and 90.4%, respectively. Total tract CP apparent digestibility values ranged from 94.4 to 94.8%, with no differences noted among treatments. Despite marked differences in composition and predicted and standardized digestibility values, when the protein sources were added to diets at a concentration of approximately 30% (25% of total energy intake), no differences in test protein substrates were noted in either ileal or total tract nutrient digestibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20023140     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2009-2140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  11 in total

1.  Chemical composition, true nutrient digestibility, and true metabolizable energy of chicken-based ingredients differing by processing method using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay1.

Authors:  Patrícia M Oba; Pamela L Utterback; Carl M Parsons; Maria R C de Godoy; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Nutrient and AA digestibility of black soldier fly larvae differing in age using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay1.

Authors:  Sungho Do; Liz Koutsos; Pamela L Utterback; Carl M Parsons; Maria R C de Godoy; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Macronutrient composition, true metabolizable energy and amino acid digestibility, and indispensable amino acid scoring of pulse ingredients for use in canine and feline diets.

Authors:  Lauren M Reilly; Patrick C von Schaumburg; Jolene M Hoke; Gary M Davenport; Pamela L Utterback; Carl M Parsons; Maria R C de Godoy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Apparent total-tract macronutrient digestibility, serum chemistry, urinalysis, and fecal characteristics, metabolites and microbiota of adult dogs fed extruded, mildly cooked, and raw diets1.

Authors:  Kiley M Algya; Tzu-Wen L Cross; Kristen N Leuck; Megan E Kastner; Toshiro Baba; Lynn Lye; Maria R C de Godoy; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Ileal digestibility of intrinsically labeled hen's egg and meat protein determined with the dual stable isotope tracer method in Indian adults.

Authors:  Sindhu Kashyap; Nirupama Shivakumar; Aneesia Varkey; Rajendran Duraisamy; Tinku Thomas; Thomas Preston; Sarita Devi; Anura V Kurpad
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Amino acid digestibility and digestible indispensable amino acid score-like values of black soldier fly larvae fed different forms and concentrations of calcium using the precision-fed cecectomized rooster assay.

Authors:  Sungho Do; Elizabeth A Koutsos; Pamela L Utterback; Carl M Parsons; Maria R C de Godoy; Kelly S Swanson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Metabolic Characterization of Meat, Fish, and Soda Intake in Males: Secondary Results from a Randomized Inpatient Pilot Study.

Authors:  Cassie M Mitchell; Paolo Piaggi; Diane M O'Brien; Jonathan Krakoff; Susanne B Votruba
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 9.298

8.  The Influence of Temperature Differences in Smoking Chamber and Furnace and Smoking Time on the Quality of Medium-Ground Sausages.

Authors:  Paulina Duma-Kocan; Mariusz Rudy; Marian Gil; Renata Stanisławczyk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  In vitro digestion and microbial fermentation of dried food residues, a potential "new" component for pet food, and different non-digestible carbohydrate sources.

Authors:  Nadine Paßlack; Fenia Galliou; Thrassyvoulos Manios; Katia Lasaridi; Jürgen Zentek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to the global protein supply.

Authors:  Claude E Boyd; Aaron A McNevin; Robert P Davis
Journal:  Food Secur       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 7.141

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.