Literature DB >> 20022892

Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.

Rosalia Maria Leonardi1, Daniela Giordano, Francesco Maiorana, Mariagrazia Greco.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of some commonly used cephalometric landmarks of monitor-displayed images with and without image emboss enhancement. The following null hypothesis was tested: there is no improvement in landmark detection accuracy between monitor-displayed images, with and without image embossing enhancement. Forty lateral cephalometric radiographs, taken from the data files of subjects were used in this study. A purpose-made software allowed recording of the cephalometric points and then, with the help of algorithms based on cellular neural networks, to transfer the previously processed radiographs into an embossed image. Five observers recorded 22 landmarks on the displayed images from the two image modalities, i.e. monitor-displayed radiograph (mode A) and monitor-displayed embossed radiograph (mode B). The positions of the landmarks were recorded and saved in the format of x and y co-ordinates and as Euclidean distance. The mean errors and standard deviation of landmarks location according to the two modalities were compared with the 'best estimate' for each landmark and the values were calculated for each of the 22 landmarks. One-way analysis of variance was then used to evaluate any statistically significant differences. Euclidean distance mean errors were higher for the embossed images (except for Po) than for the unfiltered radiographs. These differences were all statistically significant (P < 0.05) except for Or, Po, PM, Co, APOcc, and PPOcc. On the x and y co-ordinates, the accuracy of the cephalometric landmark detection improved on the embossed radiograph but only for a few points (Or on x axis and Po, PM, Co, and APOcc on y axis), as these were not statistically significant. The use of radiographic enhancement techniques, such as embossing, does not improve the level of accuracy for cephalometric points detection. Unless more precise algorithms are designed, this feature should not be used for clinical or research purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20022892     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Reproducibility and speed of landmarking process in cephalometric analysis using two input devices: mouse-driven cursor versus pen.

Authors:  Alice Cutrera; Ersilia Barbato; Francesco Maiorana; Daniela Giordano; Rosalia Leonardi
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2015-07-28

2.  Exploring digital filters for internal root resorption: how can we improve the diagnosis of small lesions?

Authors:  Priscila Fernanda da Silveira Tiecher; Nádia Assein Arús; Eduarda Adams Hilgert; Heloisa Emilia Dias da Silveira; Mathias Pante Fontana; Heraldo Luís Dias da Silveira; Mariana Boessio Vizzotto
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of Landmark Identification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images.

Authors:  Sima Nikneshan; Sudeh Mohseni; Mahtab Nouri; Hoora Hadian; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 0.212

Review 4.  Scope and challenges of machine learning-based diagnosis and prognosis in clinical dentistry: A literature review.

Authors:  Lilian Toledo Reyes; Jessica Klöckner Knorst; Fernanda Ruffo Ortiz; Thiago Machado Ardenghi
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-07-30

5.  Benefits of lateral cephalogram during landmark identification on posteroanterior cephalograms.

Authors:  Sel-Ae Hwang; Jae-Seo Lee; Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Kyung-Min Lee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  A comparative study of the reproducibility of landmark identification on posteroanterior and anteroposterior cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Eui-Ri Na; Hussein Aljawad; Kyung-Min Lee; Hyeon-Shik Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.