Literature DB >> 20022598

"Top hat" versus conventional loop electrosurgical excision procedure in women with a type 3 transformation zone.

Chumnan Kietpeerakool1, Prapaporn Suprasert, Surapan Khunamornpong, Kornkanok Sukpan, Jongkolnee Settakorn, Jatupol Srisomboon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the "top-hat" and conventional loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) performed in women with a type 3 transformation zone to assess the rate of endocervical margin involvement.
METHODS: Women with a type 3 transformation zone randomly allocated into the conventional (n=94) and top-hat LEEP (n=86) groups were analyzed.
RESULTS: The rate of endocervical margin involvement in the top-hat group was lower than that in the conventional group (32.6% vs 53.2%; RR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.68; P=0.003). Among women with positive endocervical margins, women undergoing top-hat LEEP were less likely to have residual lesions compared with those in the conventional group (52.2% vs 84.1%, respectively, P=0.04). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the top-hat and conventional groups (7.0% vs 10.6%, respectively, P=0.39).
CONCLUSION: Top-hat LEEP performed in women with a type 3 transformation zone reduces the risks of endocervical margin involvement and residual diseases compared with conventional LEEP, with no significant difference in perioperative complications. Copyright 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20022598     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  2 in total

1.  Prospective Comparison of Loop Excision under Colposcopic Guidance versus Vitom Guidance.

Authors:  G F Vercellino; V Chiantera; J Gaßmann; E Erdemoglu; I Drechsler; S Frangini; A Schneider; G Böhmer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The ongoing history of thermal therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Evan S Glazer; Steven A Curley
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.495

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.