Literature DB >> 20022567

Methodological issues in the biological monitoring of urinary benzene and S-phenylmercapturic acid at low exposure levels.

Silvia Fustinoni1, Laura Campo, Rosa Mercadante, Paola Manini.   

Abstract

Biological monitoring of low level exposure to pollutants is a very challenging analytical activity, and the quality of results is difficult to assess, especially when a certified reference material is unavailable. The aim of this work was to evaluate the reliability of the assays used to measure urinary benzene (Benz-U) and S-phenylmercapturic acid (SPMA), by applying an internal quality control protocol. Urine spot samples from 705 subjects who were either members of the general urban population, gasoline station attendants, or refinery plant workers were assayed for Benz-U and SPMA, using GC/MS and LC/MS/MS, with quantification limits of 15 ng/L and 0.10 μg/L. The median Benz-U concentration was 263 ng/L (60-2789 ng/L, 5th-95th percentile), and the median SPMA concentration was 0.19 μg/L (<0.1-2.5 μg/L, 5th-95th percentile). Linearity of both assays was good, but a less-than-proportional response was found for SPMA concentrations below 1 μg/L. Between-run precision and accuracy for Benz-U concentration determination were assessed using quality controls at 120 ng/L and 1000 ng/L and were 10.3% and 4.8%, and 104.8% and 98.9%, respectively; while the precision and accuracy for SPMA concentration determination at 0.3 μg/L, 2.5 μg/L, and 20 μg/L were 40.3%, 6.2%, and 6.2%, and 48.3%, 96.3%, and 98.8%, respectively. Precision, estimated using duplicates of unknown samples, was 13.4% for Benz-U and 26.5% for SPMA analyses. Control charts for the means of the slope of the linear calibration curve of Benz-U showed good stability of the means over a five-year period. For SPMA, a two-laboratory comparison revealed acceptable agreement between ln-transformed data pairs, with a slope of the linear regression of 0.863 (confidence interval 0.774-0.952), null intercept, and a Pearson's r value of 0.844. Reliable results were obtained for Benz-U analyses over the entire concentration range, and for high and medium SPMA levels. However, the determination of SPMA concentrations at levels close to the limit of quantification was less reliable.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20022567     DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.11.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci        ISSN: 1570-0232            Impact factor:   3.205


  4 in total

1.  Analysis of potential influence factors on background urinary benzene concentration among a non-smoking, non-occupationally exposed general population sample.

Authors:  Marcello Campagna; Giannina Satta; Laura Campo; Valeria Flore; Antonio Ibba; Michele Meloni; Maria Giuseppina Tocco; Giuseppe Avataneo; Costantino Flore; Silvia Fustinoni; Pierluigi Cocco
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Exposure to BTEX and Ethers in Petrol Station Attendants and Proposal of Biological Exposure Equivalents for Urinary Benzene and MTBE.

Authors:  Laura Campo; Federica Rossella; Rosa Mercadante; Silvia Fustinoni
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-12-13

3.  Biological Monitoring: Evidence for Reductions in Occupational Exposure and Risk.

Authors:  Jackie Morton; Craig Sams; Elizabeth Leese; Fiona Garner; Shahwaiz Iqbal; Kate Jones
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Biomonitoring of Urinary Benzene Metabolite SPMA in the General Population in Central Italy.

Authors:  Giovanna Tranfo; Daniela Pigini; Enrico Paci; Lisa Bauleo; Francesco Forastiere; Carla Ancona
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2018-07-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.