Marinus van Hulst1, Cees Th Smit Sibinga, Maarten J Postma. 1. Unit of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics (PE(2)), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.van.hulst@rug.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health economics provides a standardised methodology for valid comparisons of interventions in different fields of health care. This review discusses the health economic evaluations of strategies to enhance blood product safety in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We reviewed health economic methodology with special reference to cost-effectiveness analysis. We searched the literature for cost-effectiveness in blood product safety in sub-Saharan Africa. RESULT: HIV-antibody screening in different settings in sub-Saharan Africa showed health gains and saved costs. Except for adding HIV-p24 screening, adding other tests such as nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) to HIV-antibody screening displayed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios greater than the WHO/World Bank specified threshold for cost-effectiveness. The addition of HIV-p24 in combination with HCV antibody/antigen screening and multiplex (HBV, HCV and HIV) NAT in pools of 24 may also be cost-effective options for Ghana. CONCLUSIONS: From a health economic viewpoint, HIV-antibody screening should always be implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. The addition of HIV-p24 antigen screening, in combination with HCV antibody/antigen screening and multiplex (HBV, HCV and HIV) NAT in pools of 24 may be feasible options for Ghana. Suggestions for future health economic evaluations of blood transfusion safety interventions in sub-Saharan Africa are: mis-transfusion, laboratory quality and donor management. Copyright 2009 The International Association for Biologicals. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health economics provides a standardised methodology for valid comparisons of interventions in different fields of health care. This review discusses the health economic evaluations of strategies to enhance blood product safety in sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We reviewed health economic methodology with special reference to cost-effectiveness analysis. We searched the literature for cost-effectiveness in blood product safety in sub-Saharan Africa. RESULT: HIV-antibody screening in different settings in sub-Saharan Africa showed health gains and saved costs. Except for adding HIV-p24 screening, adding other tests such as nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) to HIV-antibody screening displayed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios greater than the WHO/World Bank specified threshold for cost-effectiveness. The addition of HIV-p24 in combination with HCV antibody/antigen screening and multiplex (HBV, HCV and HIV) NAT in pools of 24 may also be cost-effective options for Ghana. CONCLUSIONS: From a health economic viewpoint, HIV-antibody screening should always be implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. The addition of HIV-p24 antigen screening, in combination with HCV antibody/antigen screening and multiplex (HBV, HCV and HIV) NAT in pools of 24 may be feasible options for Ghana. Suggestions for future health economic evaluations of blood transfusion safety interventions in sub-Saharan Africa are: mis-transfusion, laboratory quality and donor management. Copyright 2009 The International Association for Biologicals. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: John P Pitman; Adele Bocking; Robert Wilkinson; Maarten J Postma; Sridhar V Basavaraju; Bjorn von Finckenstein; Mary Mataranyika; Anthony A Marfin; David W Lowrance; Cees Th Smit Sibinga Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Udhayashankar Kanagasabai; Dejana Selenic; Michelle S Chevalier; Bakary Drammeh; Michael Qualls; Ray W Shiraishi; Naomi Bock; Irene Benech; Fatima D Mili Journal: Vox Sang Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 2.996
Authors: Alastair Heffernan; Ella Barber; Nicola A Cook; Asmaa I Gomaa; Yolande X Harley; Christopher R Jones; Aaron G Lim; Zameer Mohamed; Shevanthi Nayagam; Gibril Ndow; Rajiv Shah; Mark W Sonderup; C Wendy Spearman; Imam Waked; Robert J Wilkinson; Simon D Taylor-Robinson Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Linda S Barnes; Jean Stanley; Evan M Bloch; Monica B Pagano; Tina S Ipe; Quentin Eichbaum; Silvano Wendel; Alexander Indrikovs; Wei Cai; Meghan Delaney Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 2.692