Literature DB >> 20020840

The clinical significance and optimal timing of postoperative computed tomography following cranial surgery.

Ahmad Khaldi1, Vikram C Prabhu, Douglas E Anderson, Thomas C Origitano.   

Abstract

OBJECT: This study was conducted to evaluate the value of postoperative CT scans in determining the probability of return to the operating room (OR) and the optimal time to obtain such scans to determine the effects of surgery.
METHODS: Between January and December 2006 (12 months), all postoperative head CT scans obtained for 3 individual surgeons were reviewed. Scans were divided into 3 groups, which were determined by the preference of each surgeon: Group A (early scans-scheduled between 0 and 7 hours); Group B (delayed scans-scheduled between 8 and 24 hours); and Group C (urgent scans-ordered because of a new neurological deficit). The initial scans were reviewed and analyzed in 2 different fashions. The first was to analyze the efficacy of the scans in predicting return to the OR. The second was to determine the optimal time for obtaining a scan. The second analysis was a review of serial postoperative scans for expected versus unexpected findings and changes in the acuity of these findings over time.
RESULTS: In 251 (74%) of 338 cases, the patients had postoperative head CT scans within 24 hours of surgery. Analysis 1 determined the percent of patients returning to the OR for emergency treatment based on postoperative scans: Group A (early)-133 patients, with 0% returning to the OR; Group B (delayed)-108 patients, with 0% returning to the OR; and Group C (urgent)-10 patients, with 30% returning to the OR (p < 0.05). Analysis 2 determined the optimal timing of postoperative scans and changes in scan acuity: Group A (early scan) had an 11% incidence of change in acuity on subsequent scans. Group B (delayed scan) had a 3% incidence of change in acuity on follow-up scans (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Routine postoperative scans at 0-7 hours or at 8-24 hours are not predictive of return to the OR, whereas patients with a new neurological deficit in the postoperative period have a 30% chance of emergency reoperation based on CT scans. In addition, early postoperative scans (0-7 hours) fail to predict CT changes, which might evolve over time and may influence postoperative medical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20020840     DOI: 10.3171/2009.11.JNS081048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  6 in total

Review 1.  Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  Lukas Blumrich; João Paulo Mota Telles; Saul Almeida da Silva; Ricardo Ferrareto Iglesio; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Value of routine immediate postoperative brain computerized tomography in pediatric neurosurgical patients.

Authors:  Jong-myung Jung; Ji Yeoun Lee; Ji Hoon Phi; Seung-Ki Kim; Jung-Eun Cheon; In-One Kim; Kyu-Chang Wang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  [Complications and monitoring standards after elective craniotomy in Germany].

Authors:  C Henker; C Schmelter; J Piek
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Postoperative intensive care unit requirements after elective craniotomy.

Authors:  Brian W Hanak; Brian P Walcott; Brian V Nahed; Alona Muzikansky; Matthew K Mian; William T Kimberly; William T Curry
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Critical Depressed Brain Volume Influences the Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma after Surgical Evacuation.

Authors:  Kyoung Min Jang; Hyun Ho Choi; Hah Yong Mun; Taek Kyun Nam; Yong Sook Park; Jeong Taik Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  No Routine Postoperative Head CT following Elective Craniotomy--A Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  Ralph T Schär; Michael Fiechter; Werner J Z'Graggen; Nicole Söll; Vladimir Krejci; Roland Wiest; Andreas Raabe; Jürgen Beck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.