Matthew R Lockett1, Lloyd M Smith. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Abstract
Carbon-on-metal substrates consist of a surface plasmon-conducting metal substrate with a thin amorphous carbon overlayer. Recently, oligonucleotide arrays were in situ synthesized on carbon-on-gold substrates, and DNA hybridization experiments were monitored with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging. We describe here the thorough characterization of these substrates and arrays as they progress through the fabrication process. Two surface plasmon-conducting metals, gold and silver, were utilized in the carbon-on-metal substrate preparation and their SPR responses compared. Oligonucleotide arrays synthesized on the carbon-on-metal substrates were analyzed with fluorescence- and SPR-based measurements. The stability of the carbon-on-metal substrates when exposed to prolonged incubations and/or serial hybridizations was also determined.
Carbon-on-n class="Chemical">metal substrates consist of a surface plasmon-conducting metal substrate with a thin amorphous carbon overlayer. Recently, oligonucleotide arrays were in situ synthesized on carbon-on-gold substrates, and DNA hybridization experiments were monitored with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) imaging. We describe here the thorough characterization of these substrates and arrays as they progress through the fabrication process. Two surface plasmon-conducting metals, gold and silver, were utilized in the carbon-on-metal substrate preparation and their SPR responses compared. Oligonucleotide arrays synthesized on the carbon-on-metal substrates were analyzed with fluorescence- and SPR-based measurements. The stability of the carbon-on-metal substrates when exposed to prolonged incubations and/or serial hybridizations was also determined.
Authors: Wensha Yang; Orlando Auciello; James E Butler; Wei Cai; John A Carlisle; Jennifer E Gerbi; Dieter M Gruen; Tanya Knickerbocker; Tami L Lasseter; John N Russell; Lloyd M Smith; Robert J Hamers Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Hajime Matsuzaki; Halina Loi; Shoulian Dong; Ya-Yu Tsai; Joy Fang; Jane Law; Xiaojun Di; Wei-Min Liu; Geoffrey Yang; Guoying Liu; Jing Huang; Giulia C Kennedy; Thomas B Ryder; Gregory A Marcus; P Sean Walsh; Mark D Shriver; Jennifer M Puck; Keith W Jones; Rui Mei Journal: Genome Res Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Christopher L Warren; Natasha C S Kratochvil; Karl E Hauschild; Shane Foister; Mary L Brezinski; Peter B Dervan; George N Phillips; Aseem Z Ansari Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ivan I Smalyukh; Olena V Zribi; John C Butler; Oleg D Lavrentovich; Gerard C L Wong Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Bin Sun; Paula E Colavita; Heesuk Kim; Matthew Lockett; Matthew S Marcus; Lloyd M Smith; Robert J Hamers Journal: Langmuir Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Matthew R Lockett; Stephen C Weibel; Margaret F Phillips; Michael R Shortreed; Bin Sun; Robert M Corn; Robert J Hamers; Franco Cerrina; Lloyd M Smith Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Margaret F Phillips; Matthew R Lockett; Matthew J Rodesch; Michael R Shortreed; Franco Cerrina; Lloyd M Smith Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Adam H Broderick; Matthew R Lockett; Maren E Buck; Yuan Yuan; Lloyd M Smith; David M Lynn Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Joshua B Mandir; Matthew R Lockett; Margaret F Phillips; Hatim T Allawi; Victor I Lyamichev; Lloyd M Smith Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Adam H Broderick; Matthew C D Carter; Matthew R Lockett; Lloyd M Smith; David M Lynn Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 9.229