Literature DB >> 20019076

Expression of, and in vivo stressosome formation by, single members of the RsbR protein family in Bacillus subtilis.

Adam Reeves1, Luis Martinez1, William Haldenwang1.   

Abstract

The Bacillus subtilis stressosome is a 1.8 MDa complex that is the focal point for activating the bacterium's general response to physical stress. In vitro studies demonstrated that the stressosome's core element can be formed from one or more of a family of paralogous proteins (RsbRA, -RB, -RC and -RD) onto which the system's activator protein (RsbT) and its principal inhibitor (RsbS) are bound. The RsbR components of the stressosome are envisioned to be the initial receptors of stress signalling with the stressosome structure itself serving as a device to integrate multiple stress signals for a coordinated response. In the current work, we examine several of the in vivo characteristics of the RsbR family members, including their expression and ability to form stressosomes to regulate sigma(B). Translational fusions of lacZ to each rsbR paralogue revealed that rsbRA, -RB and -RC are expressed at similar levels, which remain relatively constant during growth, ethanol stress and entry into stationary phase. rsbRD, in contrast, is expressed at a level that is only slightly above background during growth, but is induced to 30 % of the rsbRA expression level following ethanol stress. Velocity sedimentation analyses of B. subtilis extracts from strains expressing single rsbR paralogues demonstrated that each incorporates RsbS into fast-sedimenting complexes. However, consistent with rsbRD's lower expression, the RsbRD-dependent RsbS complexes were present at only 20 % of the level of the complexes seen in a wild-type strain. The lower stressosome level in the RsbRD strain is still able to hold RsbT's activity in check, implying that the RsbR/S component of stressosomes is normally in excess for the control of RsbT. Consistent with such a notion, reporter gene and Western blot assays demonstrate that although RsbT is synthesized at the same rate as RsbRA and RsbS, RsbT's ultimate level in growing B. subtilis is only 10 % that of RsbRA. Apparently, RsbT's inherent structure and/or its passage between the stressosome and its activation target compromises its persistence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20019076     DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.036095-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  14 in total

1.  Differentiation of function among the RsbR paralogs in the general stress response of Bacillus subtilis with regard to light perception.

Authors:  Jeroen B van der Steen; Marcela Avila-Pérez; Doreen Knippert; Angie Vreugdenhil; Pascal van Alphen; Klaas J Hellingwerf
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  From water and ions to crowded biomacromolecules: in vivo structuring of a prokaryotic cell.

Authors:  Jan Spitzer
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Rate of environmental change determines stress response specificity.

Authors:  Jonathan W Young; James C W Locke; Michael B Elowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Substitutions in the presumed sensing domain of the Bacillus subtilis stressosome affect its basal output but not response to environmental signals.

Authors:  Tatiana A Gaidenko; Xiaomei Bie; Enoch P Baldwin; Chester W Price
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  In vivo phosphorylation patterns of key stressosome proteins define a second feedback loop that limits activation of Bacillus subtilis σB.

Authors:  Christine Eymann; Stephan Schulz; Katrin Gronau; Dörte Becher; Michael Hecker; Chester W Price
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Stressosomes formed in Bacillus subtilis from the RsbR protein of Listeria monocytogenes allow σ(B) activation following exposure to either physical or nutritional stress.

Authors:  Luis Martinez; Adam Reeves; William Haldenwang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Three paralogous LysR-type transcriptional regulators control sulfur amino acid supply in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Brice Sperandio; Céline Gautier; Nicolas Pons; Dusko S Ehrlich; Pierre Renault; Eric Guédon
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Tuning the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Alternative Sigma Factor SigF through the Multidomain Regulator Rv1364c and Osmosensory Kinase Protein Kinase D.

Authors:  Richa Misra; Dilip Menon; Gunjan Arora; Richa Virmani; Mohita Gaur; Saba Naz; Neetika Jaisinghani; Asani Bhaduri; Ankur Bothra; Abhijit Maji; Anshika Singhal; Preeti Karwal; Christian Hentschker; Dörte Becher; Vivek Rao; Vinay K Nandicoori; Sheetal Gandotra; Yogendra Singh
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Blue and red light modulates SigB-dependent gene transcription, swimming motility and invasiveness in Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Nicolai Ondrusch; Jürgen Kreft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simulations of stressosome activation emphasize allosteric interactions between RsbR and RsbT.

Authors:  Ulf W Liebal; Thomas Millat; Jon Marles-Wright; Richard J Lewis; Olaf Wolkenhauer
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.