OBJECTIVE: Drugs that activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma improve glucose sensitivity and lower blood pressure, whereas dominant-negative mutations in PPARgamma cause severe insulin resistance and hypertension. We hypothesize that these PPARgamma mutants regulate target genes opposite to those of ligand-mediated activation, and we tested this hypothesis on a genomewide scale. METHODS AND RESULTS: We integrated gene expression data in aorta specimens from mice treated with the PPARgamma ligand rosiglitazone with data from mice containing a globally expressed knockin of the PPARgamma P465L dominant-negative mutation. We also integrated our data with publicly available data sets containing the following: (1) gene expression profiles in many human tissues, (2) PPARgamma target genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and (3) experimentally validated PPARgamma binding sites throughout the genome. Many classic PPARgamma target genes were induced by rosiglitazone and repressed by dominant-negative PPARgamma. A similar pattern was observed for about 90% of the gene sets regulated by both rosiglitazone and dominant-negative PPARgamma. Genes exhibiting this pattern of contrasting regulation were significantly enriched for nearby PPARgamma binding sites. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide convincing evidence that the PPARgamma P465L mutation causes transcriptional effects that are opposite to those mediated by PPARgamma ligand, thus validating mice carrying the mutation as a model of PPARgamma interference.
OBJECTIVE: Drugs that activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma improve glucose sensitivity and lower blood pressure, whereas dominant-negative mutations in PPARgamma cause severe insulin resistance and hypertension. We hypothesize that these PPARgamma mutants regulate target genes opposite to those of ligand-mediated activation, and we tested this hypothesis on a genomewide scale. METHODS AND RESULTS: We integrated gene expression data in aorta specimens from mice treated with the PPARgamma ligand rosiglitazone with data from mice containing a globally expressed knockin of the PPARgammaP465L dominant-negative mutation. We also integrated our data with publicly available data sets containing the following: (1) gene expression profiles in many human tissues, (2) PPARgamma target genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and (3) experimentally validated PPARgamma binding sites throughout the genome. Many classic PPARgamma target genes were induced by rosiglitazone and repressed by dominant-negative PPARgamma. A similar pattern was observed for about 90% of the gene sets regulated by both rosiglitazone and dominant-negative PPARgamma. Genes exhibiting this pattern of contrasting regulation were significantly enriched for nearby PPARgamma binding sites. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide convincing evidence that the PPARgammaP465L mutation causes transcriptional effects that are opposite to those mediated by PPARgamma ligand, thus validating mice carrying the mutation as a model of PPARgamma interference.
Authors: I Barroso; M Gurnell; V E Crowley; M Agostini; J W Schwabe; M A Soos; G L Maslen; T D Williams; H Lewis; A J Schafer; V K Chatterjee; S O'Rahilly Journal: Nature Date: 1999 Dec 23-30 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Quy N Diep; Mohammed El Mabrouk; Jeffrey S Cohn; Dierk Endemann; Farhad Amiri; Agostino Virdis; Mario Fritsch Neves; Ernesto L Schiffrin Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-05-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Maura Agostini; Mark Gurnell; David B Savage; Emily M Wood; Aaron G Smith; Odelia Rajanayagam; Keith T Garnes; Sidney H Levinson; H Eric Xu; John W R Schwabe; Timothy M Willson; Stephen O'Rahilly; V Krishna Chatterjee Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2003-12-04 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Henry L Keen; Michael J Ryan; Andreas Beyer; Satya Mathur; Todd E Scheetz; Barry D Gackle; Frank M Faraci; Thomas L Casavant; Curt D Sigmund Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2004-06-17 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Robert C Gentleman; Vincent J Carey; Douglas M Bates; Ben Bolstad; Marcel Dettling; Sandrine Dudoit; Byron Ellis; Laurent Gautier; Yongchao Ge; Jeff Gentry; Kurt Hornik; Torsten Hothorn; Wolfgang Huber; Stefano Iacus; Rafael Irizarry; Friedrich Leisch; Cheng Li; Martin Maechler; Anthony J Rossini; Gunther Sawitzki; Colin Smith; Gordon Smyth; Luke Tierney; Jean Y H Yang; Jianhua Zhang Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Lin Chang; Luis Villacorta; Jifeng Zhang; Minerva T Garcia-Barrio; Kun Yang; Milton Hamblin; Steven E Whitesall; Louis G D'Alecy; Y Eugene Chen Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-04-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Masashi Mukohda; Shi Fang; Jing Wu; Larry N Agbor; Anand R Nair; Stella-Rita C Ibeawuchi; Chunyan Hu; Xuebo Liu; Ko-Ting Lu; Deng-Fu Guo; Deborah R Davis; Henry L Keen; Frederick W Quelle; Curt D Sigmund Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Madeliene Stump; Deng-Fu Guo; Ko-Ting Lu; Masashi Mukohda; Martin D Cassell; Andrew W Norris; Kamal Rahmouni; Curt D Sigmund Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Christopher J Pelham; Henry L Keen; Steven R Lentz; Curt D Sigmund Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Pimonrat Ketsawatsomkron; Ramón A Lorca; Henry L Keen; Eric T Weatherford; Xuebo Liu; Christopher J Pelham; Justin L Grobe; Frank M Faraci; Sarah K England; Curt D Sigmund Journal: Circ Res Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Pimonrat Ketsawatsomkron; Henry L Keen; Deborah R Davis; Ko-Ting Lu; Madeliene Stump; T Michael De Silva; Aline M Hilzendeger; Justin L Grobe; Frank M Faraci; Curt D Sigmund Journal: Hypertension Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 10.190