Literature DB >> 20018574

ERCP-induced and non-ERCP-induced acute pancreatitis: Two distinct clinical entities with different outcomes in mild and severe form?

Pier Alberto Testoni1, Cristian Vailati, Antonella Giussani, Chiara Notaristefano, Alberto Mariani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis is a complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Aim of the study was to compare endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography-related acute pancreatitis with attacks caused by other factors.
METHODS: A series of consecutive patients with non-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography-related acute pancreatitis referred to our hospital in 2007-2008 were examined retrospectively, and compared with the same number of patients with post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography acute pancreatitis done in the same institution. Both groups comprised 116 patients and were comparable for mean age, sex, and body mass index. Duration of abdominal pain, pancreatic enzyme elevation, hospital stay, and type of analgesia administered were retrieved.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups as regards the severity of pancreatitis, mortality rate and hospitalisation, although mortality was double in severe post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography acute pancreatitis. In the mild acute pancreatitis cases, serum amylase fell 50% from the peak in a mean of 46.4h (range 24-72) in group 1 and 38.9h (range 24-72) in group 2 (p<0.001). The peak amylase serum level halved within 48h in 73.6% of cases with non-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography-related acute pancreatitis, and in 92% of patients with endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography-related acute pancreatitis (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography- and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography-induced pancreatitis did not differ as regards severity, hospital stay or mortality; in mild pancreatitis, serum amylase halved significantly sooner in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography cases. Copyright 2009 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018574     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Guideline-Recommended Cholecystectomy to Prevent Recurrent Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ayesha Kamal; Eboselume Akhuemonkhan; Venkata S Akshintala; Vikesh K Singh; Anthony N Kalloo; Susan M Hutfless
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Changing pattern of indications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children and adolescents: a twelve-year experience.

Authors:  Carlos O Kieling; Cristiane Hallal; Camila O Spessato; Luciana M Ribeiro; Helenice Breyer; Helena A S Goldani; Ismael Maguilnik
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced and non-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced acute pancreatitis: Two distinct clinical and immunological entities?

Authors:  Ivana Plavsic; Ivana Žitinić; Ivana Mikolasevic; Goran Poropat; Goran Hauser
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  The prognostic value of serum and urine amylase levels and blood count parameters in assessing the risk of post-endoscopic pancreatitis development.

Authors:  Andrzej Jamry
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.