Literature DB >> 20018567

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on chronic neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Francesco Mori1, Claudia Codecà, Hajime Kusayanagi, Fabrizia Monteleone, Fabio Buttari, Stefania Fiore, Giorgio Bernardi, Giacomo Koch, Diego Centonze.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Neuropathic pain in patients with MS is frequent and is associated with a great interference with daily life activities. In the present study, we investigated whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may be effective in reducing central chronic pain in MS patients. Patients received sham tDCS or real tDCS in a 5-day period of treatment in a randomized, double blind, sham-controlled study. Pain was measured using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the short form McGill questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Quality of life was measured using the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 scale (MSQoL-54). Depressive symptoms and anxiety were also evaluated as confounding factors using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and VAS for anxiety. Evaluations were performed at baseline, immediately after the end of treatment, and once a week during a 3-week follow-up period. Following anodal but not sham tDCS over the motor cortex, there was a significant pain improvement as assessed by VAS for pain and McGill questionnaire, and of overall quality of life. No depression or anxiety changes were observed. Our results show that anodal tDCS is able to reduce pain-scale scores in MS patients with central chronic pain and that this effect outlasts the period of stimulation, leading to long-lasting clinical effects. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents a new, noninvasive therapeutic approach to chronic, central neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis, poorly responsive to current conventional medications. tDCS is known to cause long-lasting changes of neuronal excitability at the site of stimulation and in the connected areas in healthy subjects. This led us to hypothesize that pain decrease may be the result of functional plastic changes in brain structures involved in the pathogenesis of chronic neuropathic pain. Copyright 2010 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018567     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  69 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Beatriz Teixeira Costa; Dante Duarte; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.635

2.  Combined upper limb and breathing exercise programme for pain management in ambulatory and non-ambulatory multiple sclerosis individuals: part II analyses from feasibility study.

Authors:  Tanja Grubić Kezele; Matea Babić; Tamara Kauzlarić-Živković; Tamara Gulić
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for Deafferentation Pain.

Authors:  Ahmed E Hussein; Darian R Esfahani; Galina I Moisak; Jamil A Rzaev; Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-05-23

4.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting Primary Motor Versus Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortices: Proof-of-Concept Study Investigating Functional Connectivity of Thalamocortical Networks Specific to Sensory-Affective Information Processing.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; David A Cunningham; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Erik B Beall; Sarah M Roelle; Nicole M Varnerin; Andre G Machado; Stephen E Jones; Mark J Lowe; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2017-04

5.  A Description and Critical Analysis of the Therapeutic Uses of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Implications for Clinical Practice and Research.

Authors:  David E Vance; Pariya L Fazeli; Shameka L Cody; Tyler R Bell; Caitlin Northcutt Pope
Journal:  Nursing (Auckl)       Date:  2016-09-14

Review 6.  Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for chronic low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Alwardat; Antonio Pisani; Mohammad Etoom; Roberta Carpenedo; Elisabetta Chinè; Mario Dauri; Francesca Leonardis; Silvia Natoli
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  A Protocol for the Use of Remotely-Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

Authors:  Margaret Kasschau; Kathleen Sherman; Lamia Haider; Ariana Frontario; Michael Shaw; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson; Leigh Charvet
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex (anode) and contralateral supraorbital area (cathode) on clinical pain severity and mobility performance in persons with knee osteoarthritis: An experimenter- and participant-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Hyochol Ahn; Adam J Woods; Mark E Kunik; Abhishek Bhattacharjee; Zhiguo Chen; Eunyoung Choi; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation for treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a review.

Authors:  Raffaele Nardone; Yvonne Höller; Stefan Leis; Peter Höller; Natasha Thon; Aljoscha Thomschewski; Stefan Golaszewski; Francesco Brigo; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  High-Definition and Non-invasive Brain Modulation of Pain and Motor Dysfunction in Chronic TMD.

Authors:  Adam Donnell; Thiago D Nascimento; Mara Lawrence; Vikas Gupta; Tina Zieba; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson; Abhi Datta; Emily Bellile; Alexandre F DaSilva
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.