Literature DB >> 20018311

Increased sperm DNA fragmentation in patients with vasectomy reversal has no prognostic value for pregnancy rate.

Marij Smit1, Odette G Wissenburg, Johannes C Romijn, Gert R Dohle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated sperm DNA fragmentation in patients with vasectomy reversal and its prognostic value to determine spontaneous and assisted reproductive technique pregnancy rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively assessed DNA fragmentation with the sperm chromatin structure assay in postoperative semen samples of 70 patients with vasectomy reversal. At a median +/- SD followup of 4.3 +/- 0.5 years pregnancy rates were recorded.
RESULTS: DNA fragmentation in patients with vasectomy reversal was significantly increased vs that in proven fertile controls (30.2% +/- 20.1% vs 15.3% +/- 5.4%, p <0.001). Significant negative correlations were found between DNA fragmentation index and total sperm count, progressive motility, total number of progressive sperm, normal morphology and sperm vitality (-0.325 <r <-0.805). The obstructive interval did not correlate with DNA fragmentation. The spontaneous pregnancy rate was 46%. Significantly higher log total progressive sperm motility (p = 0.021) and a trend toward lower female age (p = 0.064) were detected in the spontaneous vs the no pregnancy group. No association was found between DNA fragmentation and the pregnancy rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased DNA fragmentation is present in semen samples of men after vasectomy reversal vs fertile controls but DNA fragmentation is not associated with spontaneous or assisted reproductive technique pregnancy rates in these patients. Copyright 2010 American Urological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018311     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Acridine Orange and Flow Cytometry: Which Is Better to Measure the Effect of Varicocele on Sperm DNA Integrity?

Authors:  Essam-Elden M Mohammed; Eman Mosad; Asmaa M Zahran; Diaa A Hameed; Emad A Taha; Mohamed A Mohamed
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-11-22

Review 2.  Measuring Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Clinical Outcomes of Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maartje Cissen; Madelon van Wely; Irma Scholten; Steven Mansell; Jan Peter de Bruin; Ben Willem Mol; Didi Braat; Sjoerd Repping; Geert Hamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Use of testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with high sperm DNA fragmentation: a SWOT analysis.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Matheus Roque; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  More good than harm should be expected when Testi-ICSI is applied to oligozoospermic men with post-testicular sperm DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ahmad Majzoub; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

5.  Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on clinical outcomes for Chinese couples undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Lin-Tao Xue; Rui-Xue Wang; Bing He; Wei-Ying Mo; Li Huang; Shi-Kai Wang; Xian-Bao Mao; Jun-Ping Cheng; Yue-Yue Huang; RuiZhi Liu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Sperm DNA fragmentation test results reflect the overall quality of the whole semen specimen.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ashok Agarwal; Ahmad Majzoub
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

7.  A perspective on sperm DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  Natarajan Pandiyan; Radha Pandiyan; D Ramesh Raja
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-09

8.  Vasectomy reversal in humans.

Authors:  Aaron M Bernie; E Charles Osterberg; Peter J Stahl; Ranjith Ramasamy; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2012-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.