Literature DB >> 20018128

A cost-utility analysis of antenatal screening to prevent congenital rubella syndrome.

A K Lugnér1, L Mollema, W L M Ruijs, S J M Hahné.   

Abstract

In low vaccination coverage regions (LVR) in The Netherlands people often reject participation in the National Immunization Programme for religious reasons. During a rubella epidemic in 2004-2005, 32 pregnant women were notified with rubella, and 11 babies were born with defects related to maternal infection. This study presents a cost-utility analysis of a screening and vaccination programme for rubella focusing on three scenarios: (1) screening non-vaccinated pregnant women in LVR; (2) screening all pregnant women in LVR; (3) screening all non-vaccinated pregnant women in The Netherlands (including pregnant first-generation non-Western immigrant women). Cost-utility was estimated over a 16-year period which included two rubella outbreaks. Observed complications from the 2004-2005 epidemic were used to estimate average cost savings and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained. The programme would be cost-effective (euro1100/QALY gained) when assuming an acceptability of vaccination of 20% in women belonging to orthodox protestant risk groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018128     DOI: 10.1017/S0950268809991336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  4 in total

Review 1.  Health economics of rubella: a systematic review to assess the value of rubella vaccination.

Authors:  Joseph B Babigumira; Ian Morgan; Ann Levin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Religious subgroups influencing vaccination coverage in the Dutch Bible belt: an ecological study.

Authors:  Wilhelmina L M Ruijs; Jeannine L A Hautvast; Koos van der Velden; Sjoerd de Vos; Hans Knippenberg; Marlies E J L Hulscher
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Strategies for elimination of rubella in pregnancy and of congenital rubella syndrome in high and upper-middle income countries.

Authors:  E Terracciano; F Amadori; V Pettinicchio; L Zaratti; E Franco
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2020-04-02

Review 4.  Cytomegalovirus in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen.

Authors:  Susan P Walker; Ricardo Palma-Dias; Erica M Wood; Paul Shekleton; Michelle L Giles
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.