Literature DB >> 20018119

The impact of maternal birth month on reproductive performance: controlling for socio-demographic confounders.

Ariane Kemkes1.   

Abstract

Based on a 1900 census sample of 34,166 post-reproductive females (> or =45 years), the birth month effect was put to the test, for both lifetime fertility as well as child survival, controlling for maternal birth cohort (1826-1835, 1836-1845, 1846-1855), Duncan's SEI, urbanity, nativity, literacy and marital duration. Testing for potential cohort effects did not indicate a temporal trend in fertility by maternal birth month (seasonal Mann-Kendall test, p=0.578), while a minute increase in offspring survival was detected (p<0.001, Sen's estimator of slope=0.02, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.03). Further analyses of the maternal birth month effect on child survival were therefore seized. For lifetime fertility, ANOVA results indicated that maternal birth month was a major predictor for total offspring count (F11, 33606=1809.0, p<0.001), accounting for 37.2% of the total variability. In addition to main effects, a statistically significant interaction effect was observed (F538, 33606=2.2, p<0.001), with a corresponding effect size of eta2=0.40. Planned contrasts revealed that birth-month-specific differences in fertility achieved statistical significance (F11, 31798=1712.9, p<0.001), while post-hoc multiple comparisons for literacy and nativity displayed an inverse relationship with fertility, which meets demographic expectations. Controlling for all factors of interest, models of cohort-specific offspring counts (independent ANOVAs for 1826-1835: F157, 3467=26.3, p<0.001; 1836-1845: F182, 10299=75.5, p<0.001; 1846-1855: F199, 19859=137.9, p<0.001) indicated that women born in the first half of the year (particularly, January, February, April and May) achieved above-average parity, while those born in the latter half (namely, July, October, November and December) displayed markedly lower fertility averages. These monthly disparities are in line with previous observations and appear to be linked to seasonal optimal ripening of the oocyte or seasonal preovulatory over-ripeness ovopathy (Jongbloet, 1992).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018119     DOI: 10.1017/S002193200999054X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosoc Sci        ISSN: 0021-9320


  4 in total

1.  Birth month affects lifetime disease risk: a phenome-wide method.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland; Zachary Shahn; David Madigan; George Hripcsak; Nicholas P Tatonetti
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Modeling month-season of birth as a risk factor in mouse models of chronic disease: from multiple sclerosis to autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Jacob D Reynolds; Laure K Case; Dimitry N Krementsov; Abbas Raza; Rose Bartiss; Cory Teuscher
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Female Reproductive Performance and Maternal Birth Month: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Exploring Multiple Seasonal Mechanisms.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland; Martin Fieder; Luis H John; Peter R Rijnbeek; Susanne Huber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A model investigating environmental factors that play a role in female fecundity or birth rate.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.