Literature DB >> 20018008

Genome-wide discovery of maternal effect variants.

Jack W Kent1, Charles P Peterson, Thomas D Dyer, Laura Almasy, John Blangero.   

Abstract

Many phenotypes may be influenced by the prenatal environment of the mother and/or maternal care, and these maternal effects may have a heritable component. We have implemented in the computer program SOLAR a variance components-based method for detecting indirect effects of maternal genotype on offspring phenotype. Of six phenotypes measured in three generations of the Framingham Heart Study, height showed the strongest evidence (P = 0.02) of maternal effect. We conducted a genome-wide association analysis for height, testing both the direct effect of the focal individual's genotype and the indirect effect of the maternal genotype. Offspring height showed suggestive evidence of association with maternal genotype for two single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the trafficking protein particle complex 9 gene TRAPPC9 (NIBP), which plays a role in neuronal NF-kappaB signalling. This work establishes a methodological framework for identifying genetic variants that may influence the contribution of the maternal environment to offspring phenotypes.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20018008      PMCID: PMC2795915          DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-3-s7-s19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Proc        ISSN: 1753-6561


Background

Many phenotypes may be influenced by the prenatal environment of the mother and/or maternal care, and these maternal effects may have a heritable component. Much research has focused on the impact of measurable properties of the mother (e.g., adiposity, diabetes, alcohol, or tobacco use) on subsequent phenotypes in their children (e.g., birthweight [1], insulin resistance [2], cognitive function [3]). A more general question is: does the mother's measured genotype influence offspring phenotypes, whether or not the intermediate maternal phenotypes are known or measurable? This 'agnostic' (with respect to maternal phenotype) approach has the potential both to identify novel genetic variants of maternal effect and, via 'reverse epidemiology,' to identify novel maternal phenotypes for such effects. For the purposes of this study, we accept the strict definition of a genetic maternal effect as the indirect effect of maternal genotype on offspring phenotype [4], as distinct from asymmetric transmission of parental alleles (e.g., mitochondrial inheritance [5]) or asymmetric expression of alleles in the offspring depending on parent of origin (e.g., imprinting [6]). Here we develop mixed variance-components models in the computer program SOLAR [7] to estimate maternal random effects on quantitative phenotypes, and use the best such models as null hypotheses for measured-genotype genome-wide association tests of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes of individuals and their mothers.

Methods

Data

Data include adult quantitative phenotypes and Affymetrix SNP genotypes provided in the Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAW) 16 Framingham Heart Study (FHS) data release (Problem 2). All authors of this study are 'approved users' of these data per the NHLBI Data Use Certification of April 2008. Analysis of these data was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio. Outlying phenotype measurements (more than four standard deviations from the mean) were removed from the lipid measures (10 for total cholesterol, 9 for high-density lipoprotein (HDL), 43 for triglyceride (TG)) on the assumption that these represented assay errors. The data were normal-quantile-transformed before analysis using the SOLAR "inormal" option to meet the distributional assumptions of the variance components and regression methods. The normal quantile ("inverse normal") transformation is robust to a range of departures from normality and also removed scale effects by standardizing the data. Transformations of this type are convenient for batch processing of multiple phenotypes (e.g., Peng et al. [8]). Individuals with incomplete genotype data were given imputed genotype scores for the missing markers using the -- infer option in the computer program Merlin [9,10] Merlin imputes an expected genotype score based on the probability of each possible genotype at a locus given information on marker allele frequency, adjacent markers, and pedigree relationships. We chose not to exclude any SNPs or individuals on the basis of number of incomplete genotypes (unless no genotypes were available at all), given the robustness of imputation from family data [11]. Genotypes were similarly imputed for all SNPs for the non-genotyped implicit mothers of genotyped and phenotyped founders. These maternal genotypes entered the association analysis as properties of their offspring (see "Measured genotype analysis," below); the 'virtual' mothers did not enter the analysis otherwise.

Variance components estimation

We have implemented in SOLAR a general model for incorporating polygenic maternal effects [12-14]. Briefly, in the absence of dominance and epistatic effects, the phenotypic covariance between individuals i, j may be decomposed into additive genetic and environmental components in the usual way: where I(i, j) is an identity term (1 if i = j, or 0 otherwise), ϕ(i, j) is a coefficient of coancestry, σ(i, j) is the phenotypic covariance, and σ2and σ2are, respectively, environmental and additive genetic variances. The additive genetic covariance can be further decomposed to include maternal effects: where 2ϕ(i, mo_j) is the coancestry coefficient for i and the mother of j, and 2ϕ(mo_i, mo_j) is the coancestry of the mothers. is the additive genetic variance due to maternal effects, and ρis the additive genetic correlation between direct and maternal effects. Decomposition of the environmental component of Eq. 1 is modified from Eq. 14 of Bijma [14]: with R = 1 if i = j (equivalent to the identity matrix in Eq. 1), ρ∈ [0,1] if i, j are siblings or half-siblings, ρmo ∈ [-1,1] if i, j are mother and offspring, or 0 otherwise. Our modification from Bijma [14] was that twins were not treated differently than other siblings because dizygotic twins could not be distinguished in the de-identified FHS data. Our full mixed model also included the fixed effects of relevant covariates and the random effect of mitochondrial inheritance, σ2; the mitochondrial variance component is structured by a matrix whose elements are 1 if i, j belong to the same matriline or 0 otherwise, as described by Czerwinski et al. [15].

Measured genotype analysis

Measured genotype analysis was conducted for each polymorphic SNP by including its genotype score (the number of copies of the minor allele, range [0,2] with non-integral values for imputed genotypes) as a covariate in the mixed model [16]. Unlike standard association analysis, we included the indirect effect of the mother's genotype in addition to the direct effect of the focal subject's genotype. These effects were tested separately, with an additional test of the mother's genotype conditional on that of the focal subject. The latter test was intended to account for the non-independence of maternal and offspring genotypes: reduction of evidence of maternal association in the conditional test would suggest that the unconditioned maternal effect represented a 'bleed-through' of the direct effect, while an increase in evidence would suggest that the locus affects the trait both directly and indirectly.

Results

Screening for evidence of maternal effects

We tested our maternal random effects model on quantitative phenotypes (height, weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fasting total and HDL cholesterol and triglycerides) in individuals measured at exams when they were as similar as possible in mean age (Table 1). Sex, age, age2, and their interactions were included as covariates in all models, and use of antihypertensive medication was a covariate for SBP and DBP. The use of an indicator variable-type covariate for medication has been questioned, especially with regard to BP [17,18]. In response to a reviewer's concern, we re-ran the BP analyses while correcting for medication by adding 10 mm Hg to BP measures in medicated individuals, as recommended [17]; this did not substantially change our results (data not shown). The impact of alternative corrections for medication may have been greater if we had proceeded to association analysis of the BP traits, because we would then be testing for a difference in means. HDL-C and TG measures were not available for the original cohort and did not give evidence of maternal effect (data not shown); they were not considered further. Results for the remaining phenotypes are given in Table 2.
Table 1

FHS cohorts/examination periods used in this study

FHS Cohort/Exam Period N Age in years [mean (SE)]
Original/Exam 4 (1954-1958)35640.9 (0.20)
Offspring/Exam 3 (1983-1987)2,42246.3 (0.19)
Generation 3/Exam 1 (2002-2005)3,99740.2 (0.14)
Table 2

Parameter estimates [mean (SE)] for saturated random-effects model

Traitσ2aσ2amρa, amσ2eρsibρmoσ2mito
Height0.64 (0.02)0.19 (0.07)-0.21 (0.16)0.23 (0.08)0.03 (0.25)0.05 (0.29)0.05 (0.12)
Weight0.68 (0.03)0.22 (0.08)-0.38 (0.16)0.50 (0.04)0.00a0.02 (0.12)0.00 (0.09)
BMI0.76 (0.04)0.24 (0.10)-0.51 (0.14)0.60 (0.04)0.00a-0.02 (0.12)0.00a
SBP0.53 (0.04)0.04 (0.04)-1.00a0.74 (0.04)0.04 (0.03)0.00 (0.05)0.00a
DBP0.48 (0.04)0.24 (0.09)-0.33 (0.30)0.80 (0.03)0.00a0.07 (0.05)0.00 (0.08)
Cholest.0.58 (0.05)0.12 (0.32)-0.11 (0.75)0.75 (0.06)0.05 (0.06)0.06 (0.07)0.13 (0.09)

aEstimate on boundary; no SE computed.

FHS cohorts/examination periods used in this study Parameter estimates [mean (SE)] for saturated random-effects model aEstimate on boundary; no SE computed. Table 3 gives the log likelihoods for the minimal polygenic (PG) model (Eq. 1), a PG model with mitochondrial effect, and the saturated model of Table 2. Height showed the strongest evidence of a maternal effect (compared with the PG-mito model, P = 0.02 at 4 degrees of freedom; 4 df is probably over-conservative [19]). Interestingly, this trait initially showed a significant mitochondrial effect compared with the PG model (P = 0.008, 1 df), evidently capturing some of the maternal effects when these were not explicitly modeled.
Table 3

Comparative evidence (log likelihoods), variance-components models

ModelHeightWeightBMISBPDBPCholest.
Polygenic-112.7-1850.0-2788.8-2460.2-2724.4-2615.8
Polygenic + mitochondrial-109.1-1850.0-2788.8-2460.2-2724.4-2613.9
Saturated-103.3-1846.9-2783.5-2458.4-2722.7-2612.8
Comparative evidence (log likelihoods), variance-components models We performed measured genotype (MG) tests of association for own genotype (OMG), maternal measured genotype (MMG), and conditional maternal measured genotype (CMMG), for 476,987 autosomal SNPs from the Affymetrix 500k panel. The saturated maternal effects model was used as the null for all analyses. No SNP gave significant evidence of own- or maternal-genotype association with height when corrected for multiple testing using a Bonferroni test (critical test statistic Λ = 28.374 for genome-wide α = 0.05 and 1 df). We did not attempt to account for any linkage disequilibrium among the SNPs in our sample. The SNPs with strongest evidence for OMG, MMG, and CMMG are listed in Table 4.
Table 4

Suggestive associations with height

SNPaGeneChrom.Coordinate (bp)Λb, OMGΛb, MMGΛb, CMMGMAFcN, typedd
Sorted by OMG
rs2213883MPZL11138,961,67523.85870.83360.67780.2016836
rs12129308MCOLN2183,533,56120.923510.69983.06610.3246827
rs536609MCOLN2183,540,69520.842111.34933.48000.3256786
rs597630MCOLN2183,529,92920.708710.52232.99650.3256852
rs600924MCOLN2183,536,00120.688410.52233.01280.3256850
Sorted by MMG
rs11166947TRAPPC98136,376,5322.320224.981322.80140.3226271
rs14260221816,635,1283.796222.698418.98150.4686675
rs127096691816,653,8933.344522.609919.28530.4676838
rs756228TRAPPC98141,138,3132.529821.193218.66370.316841
rs709636410107,344,4331.884721.190419.37740.1126849
Sorted by CMMG
rs11166947TRAPPC98136,376,5322.320224.981322.80140.3226271
rs7607015281,548,3670.363221.151722.18130.0776670
rs171989734178,164,7960.383616.22820.22330.4016848
rs11048399RASSF81225,992,9980.961420.260119.52770.0426787
rs119576810107,348,2971.626820.20118.68790.1186553

aLikelihood ratio test statistic (Λ = 2 times the difference in log likelihood of test model and its null)

bAll MG tests have 1 df

cMAF = minor allele frequency.

dN, typed = number of genotyped individuals (before imputation).

Suggestive associations with height aLikelihood ratio test statistic (Λ = 2 times the difference in log likelihood of test model and its null) bAll MG tests have 1 df cMAF = minor allele frequency. dN, typed = number of genotyped individuals (before imputation).

Discussion

Several recent studies have undertaken genome-wide association analysis of human height [20-22]. These studies have typically examined very large numbers of individuals (~10,000-25,000, with multi-stage designs), larger than the 6,775 individuals in the FHS cohort available for this study. These studies agree in finding numerous loci associated with height, as may be expected for a trait long assumed to be polygenic. Under these circumstances, it is not surprising that we did not replicate specific SNPs or locations identified in these larger studies. It should be noted, however, that we did find suggestive evidence of association (OMG) with a broad genomic region identified by Gudbjartsson et al. [21]: 1q24-25 (Table 4). Our candidate genes in this region is MPZL1 (OMIM #604376), a protein tyrosine phosphatase involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. Our next four highest 'hits' were in the mucolipin2 gene MCOLN2 on 1p22. Because the published genome-wide association study on height used unrelated individuals, none reported maternal effects. Interestingly, among our strongest maternal associations are repeated hits in two regions: the TRAPPC9 gene on chromosome 8 and an intergenic region on chromosome 18. The trafficking protein particle complex 9 gene TRAPPC9 (NIBP) plays a role in neuronal NF-κB signalling [23] but has not, to our knowledge, been associated with stature in any published study. The existence of repeated (albeit suggestive) associations in this gene makes it a candidate for further investigation of the effects of maternal genotype on height.

Conclusion

We have implemented combined random-effects, measured-genotype fixed effects approach for discovery of genetic variants contributing to the indirect effect of maternal genotype on offspring phenotype. We have identified two regions on chromosomes 2 and 8 - with suggestive association at two SNPs in each region - that may contribute to maternal effects on human height. The tools developed here should be of use for a variety of phenotypes and diseases for which an effect of maternal environment is known or suspected, including height, hypertension, birthweight, and the metabolic syndrome.

List of abbreviations used

BMI: Body mass index; CMMG: Conditional maternal measured genotype; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; FHS: Framingham Heart Study; GAW16: Genetic Analysis Workshop 16; HDL: High-density lipoprotein; MG: Measured genotype; MMG: Maternal measured genotype; OMG: Own measured genotype; PG: Polygenic SBP: Systolic blood pressure; SNP: Single-nucleotide polymorphism; TG: Triglyceride.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JB, LA, TDD, and JWK participated in the design of the study. TDD prepared the phenotype and genotype data for analysis. JWK and CPP implemented the maternal-effects analysis in SOLAR. JWK performed the analyses and drafted the manuscript.
  21 in total

1.  Does accounting for mitochondrial genetic variation improve the fit of genetic models?

Authors:  S A Czerwinski; J T Williams; E W Demerath; B Towne; R M Siervogel; J Blangero
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Quantitative trait nucleotide analysis using Bayesian model selection.

Authors:  John Blangero; Harald H H Goring; Jack W Kent; Jeff T Williams; Charles P Peterson; Laura Almasy; Thomas D Dyer
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.553

3.  Estimating maternal genetic effects in livestock.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Maternal effects as the cause of parent-of-origin effects that mimic genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Reinmar Hager; James M Cheverud; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height.

Authors:  Daniel F Gudbjartsson; G Bragi Walters; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Hreinn Stefansson; Bjarni V Halldorsson; Pasha Zusmanovich; Patrick Sulem; Steinunn Thorlacius; Arnaldur Gylfason; Stacy Steinberg; Anna Helgadottir; Andres Ingason; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Elinborg J Olafsdottir; Gudridur H Olafsdottir; Thorvaldur Jonsson; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Torben Hansen; Gitte Andersen; Torben Jorgensen; Oluf Pedersen; Katja K Aben; J Alfred Witjes; Dorine W Swinkels; Martin den Heijer; Barbara Franke; Andre L M Verbeek; Diane M Becker; Lisa R Yanek; Lewis C Becker; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Thorunn Rafnar; Jeffrey Gulcher; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Maternal influence on blood pressure suggests involvement of mitochondrial DNA in the pathogenesis of hypertension: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Qiong Yang; Sung K Kim; Fengzhu Sun; Jing Cui; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy; Faina Schwartz
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Genetic determination of osteoporosis: lessons learned from a large genome-wide linkage study.

Authors:  Dong-Hai Xiong; Jin-Tang Wang; Wei Wang; Yan-Fang Guo; Peng Xiao; Hui Shen; Hui Jiang; Yuan Chen; Hongyi Deng; Betty Drees; Robert R Recker; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  Maternal smoking habits and cognitive development of children at age 4 years in a population-based birth cohort.

Authors:  Jordi Julvez; Núria Ribas-Fitó; Maties Torrent; Maria Forns; Raquel Garcia-Esteban; Jordi Sunyer
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Identification of ten loci associated with height highlights new biological pathways in human growth.

Authors:  Guillaume Lettre; Anne U Jackson; Christian Gieger; Fredrick R Schumacher; Sonja I Berndt; Serena Sanna; Susana Eyheramendy; Benjamin F Voight; Johannah L Butler; Candace Guiducci; Thomas Illig; Rachel Hackett; Iris M Heid; Kevin B Jacobs; Valeriya Lyssenko; Manuela Uda; Michael Boehnke; Stephen J Chanock; Leif C Groop; Frank B Hu; Bo Isomaa; Peter Kraft; Leena Peltonen; Veikko Salomaa; David Schlessinger; David J Hunter; Richard B Hayes; Gonçalo R Abecasis; H-Erich Wichmann; Karen L Mohlke; Joel N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Normalizing a large number of quantitative traits using empirical normal quantile transformation.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Robert K Yu; Kevin L Dehoff; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2007-12-18
View more
  6 in total

1.  GW-SEM: A Statistical Package to Conduct Genome-Wide Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst; Hermine H Maes; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Genome-wide association analyses of quantitative traits: the GAW16 experience.

Authors:  Saurabh Ghosh
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Association of genetic variation in the mitochondrial genome with blood pressure and metabolic traits.

Authors:  Chunyu Liu; Qiong Yang; Shih-Jen Hwang; Fengzhu Sun; Andrew D Johnson; Orian S Shirihai; Ramachandran S Vasan; Daniel Levy; Faina Schwartz
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Analysis of DNA methylation in a three-generation family reveals widespread genetic influence on epigenetic regulation.

Authors:  Jason Gertz; Katherine E Varley; Timothy E Reddy; Kevin M Bowling; Florencia Pauli; Stephanie L Parker; Katerina S Kucera; Huntington F Willard; Richard M Myers
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  When to rely on maternal effects and when on phenotypic plasticity?

Authors:  Bram Kuijper; Rebecca B Hoyle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  A genome-wide association study identifies three novel genetic markers for response to tamoxifen: A prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Onishi; Chihiro Udagawa; Michiaki Kubo; Seigo Nakamura; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Takashi Kuwayama; Chie Watanabe; Tomoko Takamaru; Hiroyuki Takei; Takashi Ishikawa; Kana Miyahara; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Yoshie Hasegawa; Yukihide Momozawa; Siew-Kee Low; Goro Kutomi; Hiroaki Shima; Fukino Satomi; Minoru Okazaki; Hisamitsu Zaha; Mai Onomura; Ayami Matsukata; Yasuaki Sagara; Shinichi Baba; Akimitsu Yamada; Kazuhiro Shimada; Daisuke Shimizu; Koichiro Tsugawa; Arata Shimo; Mikael Hartman; Ching-Wan Chan; Soo Chin Lee; Itaru Endo; Hitoshi Zembutsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.